レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

É muito gratificante participar de um processo pautado em ética, responsabilidade e com foco no ser humano de verdade. Tive a oportunidade de conhecer melhor meus instintos, pensamentos e atitudes atr... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

UtmÀrkt upplevelse och professionell tjÀnst Min upplevelse med Alva Labs har varit mycket positiv. Plattformen Àr anvÀndarvÀnlig, vÀlstrukturerad och erbjuder tydliga och rÀttvisa verktyg för bedö... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The exercise is so eye opening and makes someone to think deep and fast, it helps refresh the brain and answer questions about yourself which is later used to evaluate the strengths and weakness. Thi... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The whole process made very structured and easy to understand. Clearly mentioned all the instructions right from the start and I was able to follow these instructions efficiently. This consist of 2... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 応募者トラッキング システム

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Alva help companies create an inclusive and bias-free recruitment process. With our assessments, all candidates get the same chance in the hiring process. At the same time, the recruiter gets a better understanding of their candidates.


連絡先

4.7

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

407件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Jag tyckte att personlighetstestet


Jag tyckte att personlighetstestet innehöll en hel del mÀrkligt stÀllda frågor. Logiktestet blev jag dels irriterad och less på så pass att jag inte orkade genomföra det, då jag anser att utformningen Àr långt ifrån tillrÀcklig. Ni hÀvdar att ett högt resultat på logiktestet på något sÀtt kan bevisa framtida arbetsprestation, anpassningsförmåga samt förmåga till logiska resonemang? På vilka sÀtt kan det bevisa det? Calling out bullshit. Jag måste erkÀnna att jag tappade intresset av den arbetsgivare som anvÀnt sig av detta verktyg i sin rekryteringsprocess. NÀr jag gjorde logiktestet förlorade jag intresset helt efter sid 2. SÀllan skådat ett mer diskriminerande rekryteringsverktyg.

2025幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I recently completed logic and


I recently completed logic and personality test as part of a recruitment process and really enjoyed the experience. The assessments were engaging and thought-provoking, and I even learned a bit more about myself along the way. It was a great opportunity to reflect on how I think and approach different situations — overall, a very insightful process!

2025幎4月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Good logic test

Good logic test, the personality test was little mixed, I agree on most of it but some of it was not accurate, but otherwise good tests. I enjoyed the Logic test the most

2025幎4月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Skeptical

If you score high in openness, you can probably handle any kind of task, making other Big Five factors secondary. Thanks to high openness, you can adapt, learn new tasks, and manage most things, meaning the other factors become less significant.

If a person has medium-to-low conscientiousness, they might be much faster than the average colleague, and therefore do not need to be particularly conscientious, and *despite that*, they can take on more tasks and manage far more than others. However, with experience, one may have practiced being meticulous in professions where it's required. This means that low conscientiousness scores are entirely irrelevant to your personal work ethic, experience, and speed, which are the real factors (and not measured). Another point is, that low conscientiousness can be correlated with high intelligence since individuals with lower IQ need to compensate with more diligence and hard work to achieve what smarter peers barely need to work hard for.
I happen to be fast and efficient and have worked with details for so long that I would get immediate feedback if I weren't meticulous. Experience and training yield entirely different results in real life.

High openness is correlated with intelligence, which I can score well above average in non-time-stressed tests. However, the Alva Labs test doesn't just involve performance anxiety, "brain lock," and all that comes with having a job at stake. I scored much higher on the Mensa test because I knew my results were anonymous and wouldn't be assessed for a dream job, so I didn't have to sit and feel embarrassed about my results in a potential interview.

Being innovative and practically contributing to improvement also cannot be measured and is invaluable in a healthy organization. Such qualities are only assessed through self-evaluation, which makes them entirely irrelevant since everyone relies on their ego when claiming to be "creative."

On top of all this, if you're unlucky enough to be ambiverted, I don't know what an employer would gain from knowing that. A salesperson can be incredibly social during customer meetings but otherwise be a lone wolf.

Sure, basing test answers on how you are at work is positive. Humans are far more complex than the Big Five suggests (the Big Five is used in Alva Labs personality tests), and I am skeptical about how introversion/extroversion gives me a better chance of getting the right job.
Being creative on paper could potentially be used against a candidate applying for a job as an accountant, which would be quite amusing.

If someone isn't neurotic, is that individual less driven? Or am I more sought-after with low neuroticism scores since an employer would want emotionally stable employees who, for example, don't burn out? Despite low neuroticism, I received results indicating that I "avoid conflicts," (?) which is contradictory because a person unaffected by others' mood swings isn't afraid to challenge something if it's wrong.

An individual with extensive experience learns to speak up and stand their ground; being afraid to challenge a wrong situation is something most people overcome with maturity and experience. You can still be incredibly diplomatic when challenging the status quo if you're intelligent, regardless how high scores of agreeableness you get.

Big 5 is a reliable theory and I do not dismiss it as such, I just do not entirely comprehend how accurately it indicates the right hire. To prove accuracy, there would be a need to hire 3 out of 5 top candidates and see how they perform to the duties to confirm that the best top 1 candidate indeed is the best choice.
I hope HR professionals who take the time to read this gain insights that inspire meaningful skepticism.

2025幎1月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

A Smooth and Insightful Hiring Experience with Alva Labs

I used Alva Labs during a hiring process, and my experience was extremely positive. The platform is intuitive, the psychometric tests are well-structured, and the detailed explanations helped me better understand my strengths and skills. The process was quick and transparent, with clear and useful results for both me and the recruiter. Overall, it’s a great tool that makes the selection process fairer and more efficient.

2025幎3月24日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報