レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(1)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 1ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Avoid.

Avoid.

We were inherited as customers when ASC acquired Connecting Britain's hosted phone platform. Leaving cost us weeks of chasing, a £972 invoice we don't accept is lawfully due, eleven days without our main business line during our busiest period, and a legal threat on a contract they'd told us five times didn't exist.

In August 2026 ASC wrote that no customer contracts had been assigned in the acquisition, so it held no agreement with us, and gave two options: sign new terms or take 30 days' notice and port away. We chose to port.

Thirty days is not a realistic window to select a provider, complete a Letter of Authority and port 54 numbers. We started the day the letter arrived; the earliest port date was one day past the deadline.

Early emails were reassuring. On 24 August: no charges if the port completed within the notice period. On 28 August: once a port request was confirmed, numbers and services would stay active and free. Neither held.

Once the port was submitted, ASC invoiced £15 + VAT per number, £972 in total, payable within 48 hours or services would be suspended. The basis changed between emails: first our Connecting Britain terms, later withdrawn in writing, then an upstream supplier cost. Ofcom's General Conditions require porting without direct charge to the end user.

We disputed it. Our calling was barred and our main number went dead. We asked for two numbers to be forwarded to a temporary line, offering to pay: refused until the invoice was paid. We asked for evidence of the upstream cost: one £15 line item, quantity one, dated before our port request existed.

ASC then wrote it would not process the exports unless paid upfront, and ten minutes later that it had never suggested blocking the port. The same day, having told us on 21 and 24 August, 7 September and twice on 14 September that no contract existed, their legal team sent a 7-day letter asserting a "legally binding contract has been executed". It also thanked us for being a charity. We are not a charity.

Connecting Britain Ltd, the company we actually contracted with, entered liquidation eleven days after ASC's letter. Both records are on Companies House. ASC inherited its customers, so Connecting Britain's reviews are worth reading alongside these.

If you're in the same position: don't pay to leave. Ofcom's rules don't allow a direct charge for porting, and the carrier confirmed to our new provider that a losing reseller cannot hold numbers hostage over unpaid bills. File an Ofcom complaint and keep the reference; there's an industry Port Override Request process, run by the Office of the Telecommunications Adjudicator, for losing providers who suspend service or refuse to release numbers. Only your new provider can start it, and they'll need your reference. And ask your new provider to escalate with the underlying carrier directly. That's what moved things for us.

The numbers ported on the scheduled date, through the carrier, without ASC's cooperation being needed. We did not pay the invoice.

We would not recommend ASC to any business that depends on its phone numbers. Get a signed contract with explicit porting terms before committing anything, or look elsewhere.

2026幎9月6日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報