レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

1.9

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

13件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This company does not understand income


This company does not understand income outside of PAYE salaries in the UK. It's discounting earnings as structured within a Ltd. company, which is a common structure for independent consultants. The agents are disregarding proof of income in the form of invoices, bank statements, contracts, etc., as all of this can be "forged". If this is the case, then why is the website set up to request these documents? If only HMRC PAYE is considered?

2026幎4月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Not a company to be taken seriously.

I'm a landlord. Blinc have contacted me for a reference for a tenant who moved out years ago. Their communication is pushy and abrasive. For example, their first email was at 9.30pm. Next email at 9.00am subject "You have not replied". Perhaps need to read Dale Carnegie's "How to Make Friends and Influence People". This is not a professional company to be taken seriously.

2026幎3月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Intrusive information requests

This is possibly the most intrusive, time consuming process that I have ever been through to act as a guarantor for a lease. I would say that from a GDPR perspective that the level of detail that they ask to provide, including HMRC submissions constitutes an excessive personal data request and have taken the matter up with the Information Commissioners Office.

2026幎3月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I had a very concerning experience with


I had a very concerning experience with Blinc’s tenant referencing process.

As part of a standard rental application, I was asked to provide:

online banking login/ID to access bank statements

HMRC login details

National Insurance number

6 months of bank statements

3 months of payslips

credit check consent

proof of address

passport copy

While proof of ID, Right to Rent checks, payslips, and a credit check are normal in the UK, requesting online banking access and HMRC login credentials is not required under UK law and raises serious data-security and privacy concerns.

Under the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR, companies are required to collect only data that is necessary and proportionate. In typical UK letting practice:

bank statements (if requested at all) are usually limited to 3 months and can be redacted

income can be verified via payslips or employer references

tenants should never be asked to share banking or HMRC login credentials

The overall process felt far more intrusive than standard tenant referencing and made me uncomfortable about how sensitive personal data would be handled.

I would strongly encourage prospective tenants to understand their data-protection rights before proceeding and to question any request for account access or excessive financial history.

2026幎1月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely invasive and inflexible


Extremely invasive and inflexible process. They reached out to the HR department of my company in the EU regarding salary and employment details despite my advising them that this would be against GDPR (and should be illegal anywhere). I had offered to arrange a reference on the other side of the holidays, but they ignored this. Very unprofessional.

2026幎1月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Very demanding- bugs in system- poor service

The demands are incredibly onerous - but thats the wrold we live in. however the portal has bugs, documents cant be uploaded and blinc are slow to respond to meals and phone calls. zero respect for the customer's time. Very corporate feel and id seek to avoid this platform in future. I'm guaranteeing rent for my son. Im gogint o feeback to the Agent that this isnt fit for purpose. BD

2024幎9月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This has been one of the most


This has been one of the most frustrating experiences I’ve ever had with a company. I applied to be a guarantor for my son, who has already been living at the property for six months. I provided every document requested—bank statements, payslips, P60, proof of right to remain, and passport—everything except my property deed, which I do not feel comfortable sharing with a company I know nothing about.

My mortgage details are clearly visible through my credit report and my bank statements, yet they’ve marked the check as “inconclusive.” This is particularly confusing considering the same process went through without any issues just six months ago.

Frankly, it’s easier to apply for a high-value loan or credit card than to go through this unnecessarily invasive and inconsistent process. If they can't complete a check based on standard financial documentation, the real fault lies with the agency for choosing to work with such an unprofessional provider.

2025幎7月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible communication and very frustrating

Blinc has made me almost want to pull out of the referencing process several times. It seems like nobody in this company is able to talk to each other internally, as we were asked for the same documents multiple times. You'd be advised one thing by one person, and someone else would get back to you with the email template saying you need to complete the section after uploading the recommended documents. The admin was shocking - I received an email in all lowercase that didn't even address me by name. Many times my emails weren't responded to. They then wanted a WhatsApp video call to verify ID - not everyone uses this app? The whole process felt very unprofessional and frustrating.

2025幎6月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

What a truely awful experience with


What a truely awful experience with this company. I have been in tears. They asked me for documents that I did not have and made it impossible for me to rent a property in an area I have lived in since birth. Apparently, I have no right to rent in a country I was born and raised in. Ridiculous pompous and unethical practices.

2024幎11月25日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報