レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.7

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

10件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

One of the most mind-bendingly boring things I have ever done

I paid for a month of BrainHQ 3 weeks ago and have been "playing" the games 5 days a week. I am a retired research scientist, so I know about how studies should be structured, and many of the "hundreds" of studies that Brain HQ cites supporting its benefits are not well-structured. See more about that below.

As for my experience with the app, it was obviously set up by a neuroscientist without the help of a psychologist. It is repetitive to the point that it is torture to do the exercises. Then it's a downward spiral. Oh, you're bored so you're having trouble paying attention, and not doing well. Let's do that over and over and over again until you improve. That is their model. I hate it so much I will never use it again.

It seems to me that if they would structure it so that if you are doing worse and worse, they take that as a sign that you've had enough of that boring game and move on to the next one for a few minutes. SO AWFUL.
I will say that I did notice some mild cognitive improvement in the first week, but now I just dread doing those exercises and have just stopped.

As for the studies: 1. They don't compare Brain HQ to anything else, they just test the exercises, and it is not clear that they had a control group (people who did something else to see if there is a placebo effect), and 2. It is paid for by BrainHQ (Posit Science) both indications that the study does not meet scientific standards.

2026幎2月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

BORING

I've been using Brain HQ's "exercises" with a paid subscription for a couple of weeks now. I keep getting the same 3 or 4 exercises over and over. Sure, there may be a tiny variation in the color of the birds, butterflies, or cars and trucks, but they are still the same exercises. My wife uses an unpaid version and gets a wide variety of exercises. Maybe it's like Positscience says, and it's targeting my areas of greatest need until I grow, but it's so BORING. It's like I've been going to the gym and working on abs for two straight weeks. For a company that touts its remarkable use of brain science, they sure don't seem to have any understanding of the needs of neurodivergent or ADHD folks who might use their platform.

2026幎2月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Great program, science based exercises

I tried this after reading the book The Brain That Changes Itself, which references the work of Michael Merzenich, the founder of Posit Science. I like that I can have a free daily exercise, without subscribing. The exercises are science based, and the improvement in brain functioning carries over into everyday life, which is what I wanted. It’s fun to do, I do the daily free exercise in a morning and feel like it wakes up my brain. I’m sure if I subscribed to the full version, the results would be even better, but for now, the free version is great.

2024幎10月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

This is truly a great product going bad - Sad!

This is truly a great product based on very strong scientific data and I have used it consistently for almost 3 years now. I have also talked my friends into it and gifted it.
They have recently updated the site with mixed results - the new colors and algorithms are good. However, in several cases the results are absurd. FE if you use Freeze Frame - it takes 9 to 11 minutes to complete but will give you 2 minutes of credit. I can go on and on - their customer support is also quite good - but in spite of constant input corrective action is lacking. Sad ! I have gained a lot from it. Frustrated !!

2021幎8月31日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報