Cambridge University Press レビュー 

I recently went through the interview process for a UAT/QA position with Cambridge University Press & Assessment. While I expected a professional and rigorous evaluation given the institution's name, the actual experience was a masterclass in organizational disarray and contradictory evaluation.

To begin with, the technical feedback provided by the interview panel was entirely detached from reality. The feedback claimed there were severe 'connectivity and microphone issues' during the interview. In reality, the connection was perfectly stable, the audio was clear, and at no point during the live video call did the interviewers mention any audio difficulties or ask me to repeat myself. Inventing technical errors to justify a rejection is highly unprofessional.

Furthermore, the panel's critique of my testing experience was completely contradictory. I explicitly outlined a focus on modern, industry-standard manual testing practices and tools like TestRail, while accurately clarifying that my automation exposure (Selenium/Python) was foundational. Despite this clear communication, the feedback fabricated a narrative that I was trying to market myself as an automation expert. It is deeply concerning that a senior hiring panel lacks the active listening skills to differentiate between a candidate's core competencies and their proactive upskilling.

Most alarming, however, is the department’s reliance on legacy frameworks. The panel actively criticized my lack of experience with outdated, legacy test management systems like HP Quality Center, condescendingly suggesting I look into them. The wider software testing industry moved away from these rigid, legacy platforms years ago in favor of modern agile tools. Being lectured on 'breadth of knowledge' by a team that champions obsolete software is entirely ironic.

The interview process felt like dealing with moving goalposts where the panel had already copy-pasted their feedback before the conversation even began. For an institution of this stature, the recruitment process is shockingly out of touch, defensive, and lacking basic integrity. I would advise skilled QA professionals with modern tech stacks to look elsewhere.

Very bad experience with this publisher. Australian kids learn their book at school everyday. Theyn they decide to stop that edition and said that edition is no longer available, no longer support students and family. This is not right. This is unfair to the kids.
Customer service is very rude. I would give zero star if i could.
Not to mention. Their books are expensive. There're many wrong answers in the book.

Simply insulting. You can't even read the ebook you purchased for FIFTY euros. There is always some kind of problem.

Cambridge University Press Melbourne office is incredibly rude disparaging and unprofessional to deal with. They feel as if they have a monopoly over some of the mandatory kids text books so they treat their customers like dirt. I spoke to the most insufferable woman who didn't want to help me with my order. In the end their service took much longer than had I used third parties I was treated awfully and the mixed up the text books. If I could give them a minus star rating I would. Maybe it's better internationally, I don't know, but the Australian branch is the worst.

TEN OUTTA TEN PEOPLE ARE AMAZING SO KIND SO GRATEFUL FOR THEM, THANK Y'ALL FOR THE CAMBRIDGE GO TEAM, I WOULD PERSONALLY LIKE THEIR AUTOGRAPHS :))))

The problem I had with Cambridge Press now successfully solved. My refund has been received.

This is not the first time I buy from them. In both times, shipping and purchasing issues appeared (all orders, it seems, are printed on demand, and take at least two weeks, or much more; credit card payments get cancelled because they aren't confirmed, and off you go placing the order again). CUP really needs to improve their service. It is much easier (and faster!) just to go to Amazon and get the book.

Ordering system appalling. Lost payment, didn't contact me. I chased, they said would call, failed, tried again, they called this time but couldn't take payment after all over the phone. I've cancelled the order and won't use them again.