レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.8

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

3件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

2.8

すべおのレビュヌ

(3)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Poor communication and delayed service

I had a very disappointing experience with this agent, Sonika Thapa. I paid AUD 1,200 on time, but the service was consistently delayed and poorly managed.

Despite providing all required documents in advance, the work was always done at the last moment, and I had to constantly follow up for any progress. Responses were often late, and actions were only taken after repeated reminders.

When work finally began, I was frequently asked for additional documents at short notice, instead of being informed clearly at the beginning. There was no respect for my time, delays from her side were common, yet I was rushed to provide documents immediately whenever she chose to work.

She also failed to submit additional documents requested by Engineers Australia, which forced me to complete the final submission myself to avoid further risk to my application.

Overall, the experience was stressful and unprofessional. I would not recommend this agent due to poor communication, lack of reliability, and failure to deliver services as promised.

2026幎1月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible Experience with CDRaustraliamigration.com - Negative EA Outcome After 5 Months

I'm writing this review to warn others about my poor experience with cdraustraliamigration.com. I wish I had found reviews before using their services.
Background:

Occupation: Civil Engineer Draftsperson
Service: CDR writing (3 career episodes, rubric assessments, summary statement)
Cost: $1,200 AUD (combo package after discount)
Promised delivery: 25 business days with multiple corrections, plagiarism-free reports, and EA feedback handling

Timeline of Issues:
September 2, 2025: Contacted Priya for CDR assistance
September 4, 2025: Paid full $1,200 AUD upfront (first mistake)
September-November 2025: Despite promised 25-day delivery, they took 60 days to complete. I followed up 10-12 times, always getting vague responses about "quality reports" and "making sure it's top-notch."
November 2, 2025: Submitted application to EA on fast track
November 18, 2025: EA requested revisions to career episodes and project reports. When I questioned why revisions were needed after 60 days of work, no satisfactory answer was given.
December 10, 2025: Received "revised" CDR one day before the December 11 deadline. Priya suggested requesting a 10-day extension from EA.
January 15, 2026: EA requested more documents (graduation certificate from India, 6-month work experience with builders, salary slip)
January 18, 2026: Submitted all additional documents with revised CDR
January 27, 2026: NEGATIVE OUTCOME - EA stated: "The career episodes you have provided did not meet the competency required for the nominated occupation."
Their Response to Negative Outcome:
When I confronted Priya, they refused to take responsibility, claiming EA is giving negative outcomes to everyone and it's just a "trend." However, the rejection reason clearly stated the issue was with the career episodes they wrote.
Red Flags:

No physical office - Claim to be Adelaide-based but no verifiable address
Suspicious phone number - Sounds like a forwarding service to another country (possibly Nepal or India)
Facebook group promotion - Found them through "Skill Assessment- 190/189/491/186 visa ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA" group, which appears to be run by their own employees
No online reviews - Should have been a warning sign
Zero accountability - Refused to acknowledge their CDR quality issues

Final Thoughts:
I paid $1,200 AUD, waited 5 months, and received a negative outcome directly attributed to poor CDR writing. They delivered 35+ days late, required multiple EA-requested revisions, and still produced substandard work that didn't meet EA competency requirements.
My advice: Look for CDR writers with:

Verifiable physical offices in Australia
Genuine customer reviews on independent platforms
Money-back guarantees for negative outcomes
Transparent revision policies

I feel completely duped and am now back to square one with my migration plans. Don't make the same mistake I did.
Has anyone else had experience with this company or similar services?

2026幎2月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Very bad attitude and response

Very bad attitude and response
- it took long time to respond for any enquiy
- no professional, when i send the expired certificate they were not go through. Just started to change professional
- Kartika took my case after one month to prepare acs doc. She blocked me after get full payment. She just communicated till money got
- she is cheating with customer without doing work

2025幎11月7日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報