レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I tried to sign up to 2 users for my small business advertised at £17 per month. I have discovered a number of unauthorised transactions and 3 open accounts with hundreds of £££ taken off my credit ca... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Einfache Arbeiten kann das System sehr gut Lösen - leider wird es beim Coding und ÃŒbertragen von Downloads immer schlechter mit proportional zunehmender Geschwindigkeit ist die Arbeit im MT5 coding un... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Hanno creato chatgpt5, fa finta di “ragionare” meglio ma alla fine fa esattamente come la sua vecchia versione. Sui problemi complessi rallenta, cancella parti senza che gli sia stato chiesto e devi r... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Truly a game-changing technology is ChatGPT. I am an early adopter of the technology and pay my 21.00+ dollars for me and a few of my employees. As a tool, I could go for hours on how much its impro... もっず芋る

1.9

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

32件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

1.9

すべおのレビュヌ

(32)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 15ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I tried to sign up to 2 users for my


I tried to sign up to 2 users for my small business advertised at £17 per month. I have discovered a number of unauthorised transactions and 3 open accounts with hundreds of £££ taken off my credit cards. BE EXTREMELY careful. It has taken me 2 hours find out a number of accounts i did not open and cancel my credit cards and email their customer service. Just awful.

2026幎8月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely Disappointed with Codex &


Extremely Disappointed with Codex & ChatGPT Subscriptions à€•à€¿à€‚à€µà€Ÿ Misleading Service & Unhelpful AI.
​
​"I purchased two subscriptions (19k and 10k) expecting reliable support and solutions, but the tool failed to deliver any useful results for my work. It feels completely misleading and useless for real tasks. Requesting a full refund as my hard-earned money and time were both wasted."

2026幎7月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Mais quelle nullité cette IA

Mais quelle nullité cette IA. Vous payez et finalement impossible d avoir des réponses, l IA vous répond qu elle est indisponible ! C est à mourir de rire. Vous voulez vous convaincre de la nullité de ce truc. Faites un essai gratuit vous allez vite annuler !

2026幎7月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

⭐☆☆☆☆ (1 Star)

⭐☆☆☆☆ (1 Star)

I am very disappointed with my experience.

I purchased 250 ChatGPT Credits after reaching my included Codex usage limit. From my perspective, the credits appeared to be exhausted almost immediately after I started using Codex. I contacted support multiple times, provided my payment receipt and invoice, and asked for a detailed explanation of how the credits were consumed.

While support confirmed that the credits had been added and were later shown as fully consumed, they were unable to provide request-by-request usage details or a breakdown of how the credits were used. I repeatedly received automated responses before my case was escalated.

My main frustration is not only about the credits, but also the lack of transparency regarding credit usage and the difficulty of reaching a human support agent.

I hope OpenAI improves its billing transparency, provides clearer usage reporting, and makes it easier for customers to speak with a human specialist when billing disputes arise.

2026幎7月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Jag prenumerade till ChatGPT Plus men


Jag prenumerade till ChatGPT Plus men det har inte fungerat som det ska. HÀr kommer en summering av lÀget: Subject: Escalation Request – Case Marked Resolved Before Issue Was Addressed

Hello OpenAI Support Team,

I’m writing to request escalation of my unresolved support case regarding the GPT-5 Instant model being greyed out in my ChatGPT Plus account.

My previous correspondence was handled by Arjay from your support team. Despite following every step requested—including capturing and submitting a validated HAR file and screenshot—I have not received any further update or confirmation that the file was reviewed.

To add to my concern, I’ve now received two “How satisfied were you?” survey emails, which usually appear only after a case is considered resolved. Since the problem is still open and I have not received any technical findings or next steps, I’d like clarification on whether my case was closed in error or auto-closed by your system.
If this is standard policy, please confirm—but if not, I request that my case be reopened and reassigned to a senior representative or escalation manager for continued assistance.

For reference, here’s what has already been done:

Submitted full HAR log (chatgpt.com.har) and sanitized version.

Provided Google Drive link and screenshot confirming file validity.

Completed all troubleshooting steps related to Microsoft Edge and ChatGPT Plus access.

This issue has already consumed several hours of effort, and I would appreciate confirmation that it’s now in the hands of someone who can review it fully.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I look forward to hearing from a support manager or escalation specialist soon.

2025幎11月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

⚠ Recensione Pessima su ChatGPT-5

⚠ Recensione Pessima su ChatGPT-5
Esperienza disastrosa. ChatGPT-5 viene venduto come un assistente intelligente, ma nella pratica Ú lento, impreciso e spesso inutilizzabile. Anche con prompt perfetti, sia in italiano che in inglese, sbaglia grammatica, sintassi e contenuti. Scrive “siciamno” invece di “sciamano”, confonde i nomi, ignora le istruzioni e non capisce il tono richiesto. E non parliamo della pronuncia robotica e stonata nei testi letti da AI: un incubo per chi lavora con speaker vocali.

E se non paghi? Non funziona. Nessuna trasparenza su questo punto: se non rinnovi l’abbonamento, l’AI si blocca o diventa inutilmente limitata. Ma questo non lo scrivono da nessuna parte. “ChatGPT può commettere errori”? Certo. Ma qui si tratta di errori sistematici, non di eccezioni.

Conclusione: Per chi lavora nel mondo della produzione editoriale, video e social, ChatGPT-5 Ú una fonte di frustrazione. Fa perdere tempo, non rispetta le istruzioni, e non Ú affidabile. Pessimo investimento.

#ChatGPT5Delusione #AIinutilizzabile #ErroriAI #RecensioneNegativa #Focus30 #ContentCreatorFail #ItalianoCorretto #FrustrazioneDigitale #CanvaDisastro #AIfail

2025幎10月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Chat CPT för fotoförÀdling

Har abonnerat på Chat CPT för att förbÀttra gamla bilder ur familjealbumet. Vid generering av ny bild stoppas 8 av 10 bilder av tjÀnstens filter då det "strider mot policyn", t ex veteranbilar, förÀldrars bröllopsfoto, gamla faster på Àngen . Helt obegripligt. TjÀnsten Àr helt vÀrdelös och kostnaden 269 kr per månad helt bortkastad. Uppdatering kvÀll: nu stoppas alla bilder i filtret oavsett innehåll.

Chat CPT meddelar "I gratisversionen har filtret ibland varit mindre strikt → dÀrför har vissa av dina familjebilder gÃ¥tt igenom dÀr.

I beta-/betalversionen körs nyare skydd → dessa Àr mer kÀnsliga och kan blockera Àven helt oskyldiga foton, sÀrskilt om de innehÃ¥ller mÀnniskor eller detaljer som algoritmen feltolkar."

Min fråga Àr dÀrför - varför tar Chat CPT (kraftigt) betalt för en version som inte Àr funktionell medan den version som fungerar Àr gratis?

2025幎9月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Chatgpt5 poco meglio di chatgpt4

Hanno creato chatgpt5, fa finta di “ragionare” meglio ma alla fine fa esattamente come la sua vecchia versione. Sui problemi complessi rallenta, cancella parti senza che gli sia stato chiesto e devi ricominciare perchÚ entra nel suo loop in cui ha dimenticato cosa ha fatto. Resta meglio di tutte le altre AI sui compiti complessi ma ancora non ci siamo. Alla richiesta “ridammi tutto il codice completo” se fai il confronto col codice veramente completo non trascrive delle parti e ti rende il suo codice completo che Ú incompleto. Non ci siamo proprio, per 22€ al mese resta un giocattolo per idioti

2025幎8月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Constant upselling

Constant upselling, poor support. Every session is littered with prompts to upgrade — the free version is so crippled it feels like a demo. What’s worse, the process for reporting bugs or malfunctions is deliberately convoluted, clearly designed to make users give up. Instead of offering real support, it pressures you to pay. Frustrating and disappointing.

2025幎8月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Completely unreliable

Completely unreliable. Disrespectful towards users.

People-pleaser in a nauseating way. His writing is constantly repetitive and full of cliches. Never does what you ask it to do. And the most infuriating thing of all is a bug that they won't fix that frequently gets it to write back: "I'm sorry, but I can't continue this conversation". For no reason. Even when you paid for a subscription! Not worth it.

2025幎7月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Trying AI for Coding

I am trying various AI models to build a server. I am new to coding and so far have had some very good experiences and have my server built, almost, how I want it. I had one issue left I used Chatgpt for. It kept making errors, requiring constant feedback that used up the session before getting anywhere. Every new session ended up putting me further behind than when I ended my previous session. It kept breaking software. It kept forgetting what software I was using and what versions I was using despite it telling me to install certain software. It even wiped out my core files, only to say sorry you cannot retrieve those files now. I had to rebuild more than one container and docker more than once. Nope, this is not for me. I tried for 4 days to get somewhere with it, but am slightly behind where I was when I first tried Chatgpt, and without all my files and photos of course. I do have them elsewhere. This is an experiment luckily. I do know how to install and remove software now though. I am very wary using this for coding and will not use it unless it is for a simple clarification. I certainly would not subscribe to it for coding purposes.

2025幎7月6日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報