Classic Auto Appraiser レビュー 6

TrustScore 5段階評価の3.5

3.7

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

企業情報

  1. 法律サービス
  2. カーディーラー
  3. ハイヤー サービス
  4. 車検

当該企業による記述

Classic Auto Appraiser is a privately owned automotive inspection and appraisal business serving the contiguous United States. Our services include: actual cash valuation (ACV), diminished value appraisals, prior to loss appraisals, insurance dispute/contesting appraisals, pre-purchase inspections, legal services (arbitration and expert witness services), vehicle brokering and automotive photography. Our documentation is trusted and accepted by banks, credit unions and all major insurance companies. It's our mission to connect people with cars they care about and to protect them and their vehicles in this hobby we cherish.


連絡先

3.7

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3.5

6件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

AI is not the way to appraise a classic…

AI is not the way to appraise a classic vehicle. Need to use experience and common sense instead of depending on AI to do the work. Need to check everything over before sending appraisals to the client. Make sure the appraisal is correct and makes sense and is factual before sending. Need to use proper comparables that are in alignment with the vehicle being appraised. Take questions and criticism constructively and not personally.

2025年11月26日
Classic Auto Appraiser ロゴ

Classic Auto Appraiser からの回答

Hey Bob,

Thanks for the review. Just to contextualize your above statements AI (artificial intelligence) is not used to value any vehicle. Rather we use AI in very rare circumstances to pull obscure vehicles, with few comps, off of the lesser known sites on the internet. For your collection we used this process only for your 1954 REO grain truck to find real world comparables in similar (poor) condition. We still hand pick from what is pulled by the search the best comparable for your vehicle and manually adjust values accordingly. AI is a tool in our toolbelt yet it is not used in any part of the valuation, nor are comparables automatically selected by it, rather it does the deep internet digging for us (exp. a forum post on page 20 of Google that has the right comparable we need, that is our only purpose for AI in our company). Saying AI did the work is a dishonest claim knowing how long you and I talked about my appraisal process and my specific reference to using the technology for sourcing one very obscure vehicle in your collection. Not to mention how much we talked at length about my appraisal process prior to you ever hiring me, so you knew exactly how my work was done.

I'll admit I'm sorry we did make two mistakes on two different appraisals both of which were remedied immediately. One for your 1968 Camaro which we had comped with hardtops instead of convertibles (the broad market data was still convertibles, and all fell into the appropriate restomod category) and we accidently inserted Pontiac Firebird comps into the GTO appraisal as we were simultaneously working on a GTO and Firebird. Again the latter one being the greater offender, both were remedied and sent back post haste. I really don't see how this is a big issue. I'd say the greater issue would be me having to debate with you on every value almost everyday we interacted, despite me being the unbiased third party appraiser you needed for this court dispute and you being a party with vested interest in how the values of these vehicles were returned to you.

All of the appraisals (including the ones I fixed) reflect their markets accurately and have comps that match them very well. You don't have to agree with me, in fact when you disagreed I went the extra mile to hear you out and adjusted values that merited change based on your verbal testimony entirely, although you have something to gain in this transaction as this is a court dispute in which values can serve your purposes better if they align with what you think they are worth. You also sent in very poor quality photos to work with making any fine tuning of my initial assessments difficult although they were still done to the best of my ability considering the limitations and you still considered them worthy of use for your purposes. If you had procured better photos this may have possibly changed the outcome, however you should have still supplied the context for this review that there is a financial stake for you since you are splitting up assets between you and another party in a court setting.

I am happy to take questions and answer them, as you know since you benefitted from hours of my time on and off the clock (and after hours) at no added expense to you, but you should receive the answers I give you as me giving them to you in good faith. I also quite literally walked you through each appraisal (and its methodology) which I am not required to do, rather it was a courtesy (really no other appraiser I've worked with or met does this, so I'm not sure where else you were going to get this service). Which really brings me to your motivations for disagreeing with every value I established especially after receiving such a massive discount (almost 50% off of what should have been a $6,000 job) for a collection I did all the work on yet you decide to only use and pay for half of it. Ultimately Bob, I stand by the appraisals I wrote, regardless of whether or not you like the final values.

Best,
D.C.

5つ星のうち5の評価

CAA used for lending purposes

As a lender, I use Daniel for situations where book values fail to represent special and/or collectible vehicles. His work is extremely thorough (literally more thorough than home appraisals) and his expertise is invaluable. If you have a car and want to demonstrate its unique value to anyone (lending institution, insurance company, potential buyer, etc.) then you will not do better than the product CAA offers.

2023年6月19日
自発的なレビュー
Classic Auto Appraiser ロゴ

Classic Auto Appraiser からの回答

Thank you for your review of Classic Auto Appraiser!

5つ星のうち5の評価

Excellent experience

Excellent experience with Daniel at CAA. I had my 2007 Corvette z06 appraised and valued by Daniel. They are very knowledgable, professional and willing to answer any questions. I would recommend them to anyone who needs their car, classic or modern, appraised.

2024年3月19日
自発的なレビュー
Classic Auto Appraiser ロゴ

Classic Auto Appraiser からの回答

Thank you Zach! It was a pleasure working with you and valuing that beautiful LeMans blue Z06. Should you need anything else please don't hesitate to reach out, and take care!

5つ星のうち5の評価

Great company and very knowledgeable.

2024年2月24日
自発的なレビュー
Classic Auto Appraiser ロゴ

Classic Auto Appraiser からの回答

Thank you Mark for the review! We hope you are doing well and thank you again for rating us. If you need anything in the future please don't hesitate to reach out!

Best,
Daniel C.
Classic Auto Appraiser

レビューの対象になっている企業の方へ

プロフィールを登録して、Trustpilot の無料ビジネス ツールにアクセスし、お客様とのつながりを広げてください。

無料アカウントを取得

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報