Cosmodent レビュー 4

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

3.0

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら


連絡先

3.0

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

4件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

Permanent Damage. Zero Accountability.

My recent experience was deeply distressing and has had lasting consequences for my dental health. Due to serious errors in diagnosis and treatment planning, my teeth were significantly damaged, requiring corrective treatment elsewhere. What should have been routine care resulted in avoidable harm.

Even more troubling than the clinical failures was the complete lack of accountability. At no point was responsibility acknowledged, nor was there any genuine effort to resolve the situation. My concerns were met with defensiveness rather than transparency, leaving me to manage the physical, emotional, and financial consequences alone.

After seeking an independent assessment, I was advised that corrective treatment was necessary as a direct result of the previous work. No patient should have to undergo further invasive procedures because of preventable mistakes.

I am also seriously concerned about the authenticity of many of the positive reviews associated with this practice. A significant number appear generic, vague, and lacking in detail. Given the contrast between these brief five-star comments and the detailed negative experiences reported by multiple patients, it raises legitimate questions. From my perspective, the positive reviews appear designed to dilute or neutralize negative feedback rather than reflect genuine patient experiences.

A consistent pattern emerges in the critical reviews: poor clinical outcomes, warnings regarding complex procedures (including root canals), billing and quotation disputes, and defensive responses when concerns are raised. This pattern cannot be ignored.

I cannot recommend this practice. If you are considering invasive or costly dental treatment, I strongly urge you to obtain an independent second opinion, request fully itemised written quotes, and ensure you receive complete copies of your clinical records before proceeding.

2025年6月27日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち5の評価

Dr AM Dumas is the kindest & most…

Dr AM Dumas is the kindest & most gentle person I have ever met! His work is exquisite, his attention to detail is out of this world! I will recommend Dr AM Dumas to everyone all over the world!
The staff is professional and efficient, caring and kind! They provided the best service that I have ever received- ever!!!!!

2025年11月18日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Treatment performed on the wrong tooth and required remedial care

I attended Cosmodent Bellville as an overseas patient with limited time in South Africa. My request and consent were for one specific tooth only (tooth #10), based on the X-ray I provided in advance and the written discussion before my arrival.

Timeline and what happened:

17 October 2025: I shared an X-ray and asked for advice and costs for tooth #10. I was told the tooth required re-treatment.

14 November 2025 (appointment): The narrative changed. Andre Dumas stated in writing that “both” teeth had posts/abscesses and that he would treat both, including removing “the other one” the following week. This was not the single-tooth scope I travelled for and consented to.

Immediately after this work: I experienced complications and the visible appearance of my teeth changed. My teeth were straight before treatment, and a tooth became visibly skewed afterwards (this is clear in the before/after images I have uploaded).

I then developed infection/pain in the same area (photo evidence uploaded).

Because of the infection and the visible change, I sought an independent endodontic assessment and had a CBCT scan performed by a third party. The CBCT findings and the clinician’s explanation were extremely concerning, including evidence consistent with a serious procedural error (you can see why in the lateral CBCT views I have uploaded).

The post-treatment X-ray and the extracted-tooth images show the extent of the work performed, and the extracted tooth evidence demonstrates the post position and perforation issue that was identified.

Ultimately, I had to proceed with extraction and further remedial planning (again, documented and supported by images and records).

What makes this particularly serious is that the written explanations backtracked and changed over time versus what was originally discussed and what I requested. I have uploaded a chronology matrix screenshot (requested scope vs what was done/said) and before/after photos, X-ray, CBCT, and extraction evidence so the public can review the facts for themselves.

I have also submitted a formal complaint to the HPCSA

2025年11月28日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Stay far away from Dr. Andre M Dumas

We used Dr. Andre M Dumas for dental treatment in Cape Town and had a very negative experience.

The fees initially appeared competitive, but the total cost increased as the work progressed. More importantly, the outcome was poor: following treatment, my wife developed complications including an infection, and we ultimately had to seek corrective treatment from another dentist.

We attempted to contact Dr. Dumas for follow-up and a plan to address the problem, but we did not receive constructive support. What further undermined our confidence was the inconsistency in explanations. We were told one account at the time of treatment, and later the explanation changed. After obtaining a second opinion, the assessment and findings we received did not align with what we had been told previously.

If Dr. Dumas responds to this review by claiming he cannot identify us as patients, I am comfortable confirming privately (with appropriate proof) that we did receive treatment, and I am willing to share the timeline and supporting documentation with anyone who is seriously considering this practice.

Based on our experience, I would not recommend Dr. Dumas. I would encourage prospective patients to prioritise a fully professional clinic environment, clear written treatment plans, transparent pricing, and a documented aftercare and remediation process if complications arise.

2025年8月14日
自発的なレビュー

レビューの対象になっている企業の方へ

プロフィールを登録して、Trustpilot の無料ビジネス ツールにアクセスし、お客様とのつながりを広げてください。

無料アカウントを取得

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報