レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I cannot speak too highly of Courtaid.ai. It finds case law and associated materials in answer to my query, but the real value of Courtaid.ai is its ability to refer me directly to the source material... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Courtaid is the best AI assisted legal research tool I have tried, certainly at the price. The summaries are pretty good, but the real benefit is the immediate access it gives me to the primary source... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Excellent customer support and so far impressive legal platform. Still assessing but expect to be giving five stars shortly. Well done to the creators and thank you.

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

A new and totally intelligent app. I though a.i would be too simple to use or togain information I could use, but oh boy cour5 aid showed itself to be the legal advice I needed, both quick In respondi... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 怜玢゚ンゞン䌚瀟

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Law. Simplified. An Australian AI law assistant and research tool meant to make the law industry easier to navigate. Used by lawyers, paralegals and the public alike. Courtaid.ai allows you to quickly search through hundreds of thousands of judgments and legislation to find relevant cited references to any issue.


連絡先

4.5

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

72件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌの 33に回答しおいたす

通垞48時間以内に回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Excellent tool for those who new to navigate the legal system on a budget

Excellent customer support and so far impressive legal platform. Still assessing but expect to be giving five stars shortly.
Well done to the creators and thank you.

2026幎1月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
Courtaid.ai ロゎ

Courtaid.ai からの回答

Hi Jesse, thank you for the feedback. I have emailed you to discuss. I will note here you have 3 different accounts, with one paying - I am unsure if you are using the correct paying account. we also have in app support for paying users on the top right.

Keen to discuss more especially the quality of research responses you were getting

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Real strengths of Courtaid.ai

I cannot speak too highly of Courtaid.ai. It finds case law and associated materials in answer to my query, but the real value of Courtaid.ai is its ability to refer me directly to the source material. Many times, it offers AI chat features with the PDF. This helps me navigate through the document. Courtaid has improved my efficiency, but does so with rock-solid credibility.

2025幎10月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The great experience is getting a snapshot using better structure when presenting cases.

The great experience is getting a format or a proper structure to address legal positioning for the best advantage for whoever is looking for justice and this practice helps reputation, realiability and resources that are very much needed to keep costs down for people acquiring legal services especially underserved communities that do not have the financial capacity for justice.

2025幎10月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

NZ SRL triumphs over NZ Police Prosecution Services

Self-represented litigants get a "bad rap" in legal circles. Lawyers say we clog up the Court system, Judges say we irritate them, and Court Registrars sigh deeply when they realise that we are filing as SRLs.

Enter Courtiad.AI.

I'm an NZ SRL who triumphed over a team of Senior Police Prosecutors within the Waitemata Police District, and I used Courtaid.AI to help me do it.

I wasn't clogging up the Court system; the NZ Police were instead chasing a case they could not possibly win; I wasn't irritating Judges; the Judges instead complimented me on my "excellent submissions", and my "level of preparation", which was far in advance of the preparation of the NZ Police; and Court Registrars didn't sigh deeply when they saw me; the Court Regsistrars instead came to trust my filings to the point of not having to check them for completeness or filing accuracy.

Quite simply, Courtaid.AI democratises the legal system for SRLs and levels the playing field in the courtroom against the prosecution.

As an experienced SRL, I have won several cases in the civil jurisdiction (pre-Courtid.AI) , but I was untested in the criminal jurisdiction. Courtaid.AI became my trusted "go-to" legal companion.

Courtaid.AI is an outstanding legal tool for SRL's to use, and I now share this tool with anyone who is navigating a legal proceeding.

2025幎10月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The Democratization of Law

Court Aid does exactly what it says on the tin. Using it brings back memories of when I first used the music system, a full studio, on my G4 Apple Mac. The music, and in this case, the legal system, just spread out before me and I was empowered by the legal detail. The pricing is well thought out and worth every penny.

2025幎9月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Having to check info outweighs benefits, can’t get in touch with CourtAid to discuss

I have used CourtAid.ai for legal research. I work as a senior lawyer in private practice. I found CourtAid I somewhat useful, it’s a great concept, but the more I used it, the more inaccuracies I came across (incorrect case references, references to incorrect parts of legislation relevant to the query I was posing). I appreciate AI does this, it’s not perfect. I have subsequently cancelled my subscription because the act of having to check things were correct was counteracting any “efficiency gains” being made. What I am more concerned about is that there are CourtAid charges on my credit card beyond the subscription and I would like to get in touch with the company to find out what is going on. I’ve emailed them a few times to no avail - I cannot seem to get anyone to return my contact. My main concern now is that this company, who won’t bother to help me sort out my issue, has my credit card details!

2025幎8月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
Courtaid.ai ロゎ

Courtaid.ai からの回答

Hi Rachel, thank you for the review, but i think there might be some confusion.

We have received one email from you, which was really helpful feedback - the main issue is context in the chats, if you are looking to chat to one specific case your best option is to press 'chat pdf' so you are loading the full context of that case in.

But we have not received any other emails from you, i have also messaged you on linked-in and emailed you back.

To communicate with us, we have a customer service chat on our website courtaid.ai or a phone number- which i have also checked and can't see any other messages/inquires from you .

We also use stripe for payments/subscription management, which is a third party payment platform. We do not have access to yours or anyones credit card information

happy to chat if you want to reach out courtaid.ai or phone us, or reply to our email or linkedin message.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

The Courtaid ai has helped fast track my research

The Courtaid ai has helped fast track research of similar cases and authorities. I would like the box for the list of juridsdictions to not over lap the page and obscure other text. perhaps have a split screen with a drop down to one side leaving the main screen clear. I like the improvements and see this tool is getting better. Good work guys. This also shakes up the industry and lets others see if they are on the right track. I am grateful for the help as a self represented claimant. The research results have kept my case going. Thanks again.

2025幎8月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

A Reliable Tool That Earns Its Keep

For anyone dealing with family, migration, civil, or even general criminal matters, this platform delivers sharp returns. Whether it's parsing legislative frameworks, surfacing obscure precedents, or mapping the right judicial pathway, Courtaid cuts through the noise and gets you to what matters.

What actually saves time is its ability to retrieve primary sources instantly and allow real-time, contextual engagement with the material.

If you're deep in the criminal law trenches, instincts still run the show. But for layered, document-heavy work like parenting matters, civil procedure, or cross-border visa appeals, Courtaid simplifies the heavy lifting and clears mental space for strategy.

2025幎7月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Courtaid is the best AI assisted legal


Courtaid is the best AI assisted legal research tool I have tried, certainly at the price. The summaries are pretty good, but the real benefit is the immediate access it gives me to the primary sources, often with the option to "chat" with the primary source. It becomes guided research, which is superb. No AI system can or should be relied on entirely, but Courtaid gives you the tools and access to confirm that what has been found is the right stuff. I cannot be happier.

2025幎6月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Researching Court Judgements especially


Researching Court Judgements especially when there are multiple court judgements on a case is daunting at best. First I had to educate myself in how courts and judgements are recorded and stored and the various avenues to reach the right set of documents. I was researching documents for a personal project when an online advertisement appeared for Courtaid. Well wow. With the details I had gathered Courtaid gave me the entire collection of documents I needed. I am so grateful and if you need this information.... don't hesitate, it is brilliant!

2025幎4月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I find CourtAid as a highly invaluable


I find CourtAid as a highly invaluable resource and tool for ascertaining Precedence's and Judgements in many Legal jurisdiction's, I am very impressed of the ease of use, the speed of returned answer's and the quality of relevant references cited. I highly recommend CourtAid as an important tool when undertaking Litigation or Defense. Well Done to the Court Aid Team :-)

2025幎5月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

I got clearer answers asking


I got clearer answers asking perplexity.ai the same question about NZ laws. It also couldn't direct me to a source of Employment Tribunal hearings. And I am flooded with junk mail extolling the supposed virtues of courtaid.ai - too much

2025幎5月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Very useful app

Very informative for an average person. Links to cases that are relevant to the question asked. Would recommend to anyone to get a better understanding of where they stand before it starts getting complicated.

2025幎5月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

No different to general ai

The case law is no more developed than any other generic AI! I have asked for multiple different areas and each has been incorrect. The cases are at least real, but the summary is incorrect. This system does not streamline legal research.

2025幎4月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Offer some clues

I asked whether aggravated or exemplary damages can be awarded against a neglient doctor who altered his clinical records to cover-up his negligence.

The answer I got was "while aggravated damages are not applicable for negligence, exemplary damages may be considered, particularly in cases involving egregious conduct such as altering records to cover up negligence.

Citations:1. ABC & Ors v Derbyshire County Council & Ors, Re Costs [2023] EWHC 1337 (KB) 2. Powell & Anor v Boldaz & Ors [1997] EWCA Civ 2002".

I read these two cases and didn't find the word exemplary though. In Powell case, it was about, among others, tort of deceit and fiduciary duty. The relevance to exemplary damages claim (non-compensatory, aimed to penalise) is rather slim, can't see the relevance. The Court doesn't like citations of precedents that are not on the point, wasting Court's time.

Good: at least the precedents are real, unlike some other Ai which lied and admitted their lies when confronted.

Hope to see more value of this Courtaid.ai soon!

2025幎3月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
Courtaid.ai ロゎ

Courtaid.ai からの回答

Hi Anthony,

Thank you for the feedback, just checking this for you. Checking based on the UK (based on your sources) and in your feedback you said "I read these two cases and didn't even find the words aggravated and/or exemplary."

so checking those sources for you, which might be easier to do with the chat to pdf feature:

ABC & Ors v Derbyshire County Council & Ors, Re Costs [2023]

Paragraph 18:

Aggravated damages cannot be awarded for the tort of negligence: Kralj v McGrath
[1986] 1 All ER 54, at 60-61. Accordingly, the sums for aggravated damages could
only have been sought by the Claimants in their HRA claims and, for ABC and DEF,
in their false imprisonment claims

In terms of the second source, although it doesn't have the words it is using synonyms. The way the AI search is during processing it 'chunks' documents and figures out their context, then when you enter a question it compares your context to the documents to try and find more relevant cases. In this case on page 17 seemed the most relevant to your query for source Powell & Anor v Boldaz & Ors [1997] EWCA Civ 2002"

where it said:

“where the Defendant’s act is plainly calculated to produce some effect of the kind which was produced, an intention to produce it ought to be imputed to the defendant”


I hope that helped and you still see value in the service







5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Comparable to research memo done by a competent law grad

I came across Courtaid because I needed to some legal research and it was free. Whilst I can't say that it is comparable to big names like Weslaw and LexisNexis, Courtaid was good enough for me.

In fact, I would go as far as to say that whenever I made a query on the free platform the answer I got was often very comparable to a research memo drafted by a competent fresh law grad yet to enter into practice, but much faster.

Unfortunately, that is where Courtaid loses some points with me. As I said the answers given are usually comparable to a research memo done by a competent fresh law grad yet to enter into practice.

Indeed, a few times, I was directed to the wrong case when clicking a hyper-link and more often times, the answer produced was not in line with what I had expected.

Be that as it may, I always still come back to using Courtaid as a free platform to at least point me in the right direction for the solution I need.

NOTE: This is based on the free platform, it might be the case that the paid version might produce better results then the one I experienced.

2025幎3月10日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報