レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

How does this body manage to be paid for doing very little? The last reviews we have for our surgery are from 2019 and described as good. Really? With serious delays getting blood tests, seeing... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Utterly dysfunctional and rude, they hung up twice today while we're on hold waiting for an answer. They didn't know about auto-renewal of Enhanced DBS Certificates and can't be asked to check, now de... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Scrap CQC. They declare abusive and unsafe care venues safe and Good. I reported serious abuse in 2 psychiatric ward and they retorted them as safe, despite my report there was blood trailing up the c... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

How they get their ratings is a mystery. They rated my GP practice as "good", yet the reviews for the practice are anything but good. Personally, I've complained several times without any noticeable... もっず芋る

䌁業情報


連絡先

1.2

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1

87件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Complete waste of time

The function of tge cqc is to not pay anything out. The staff are incompetent, dishonest and working to a single objective - to avoid responsibility for anything. A complete waste of time and money.

2022幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

NOT RELIABLE OR FUNCTIONAL

They visit nursing homes with dementia patents and write up their reports as if those patients they have talked to have an idea what they are on about! I have read their inspection reports about a couple of nursing homes and then I visited those nursing homes to see what they really are like. The first impression can be very misleading and believe me this is almost always the case with nursing homes if they are funded by local authorities. CQC inspectors of course know this very well but since they do not want the elderly to benefit from CHC funding they tend to write very positive things about local authority funded care homes- well, this is at least what I think.

After they carried out their biased and simply appalling assessment, CHC Oxford cut the eligibility funding and my mum then had to be transferred from her nursing home to a local authority funded care home. The local authority funded care home I visited had a friendly staff and somewhat acceptable lounge which was also used as a dining area, and clean bedrooms with basic furnishing. The outside seating area was small but looked tidy. This LA funded nursing home was of course inspected by CQC and their services were described as "outstanding" by this organisation... However, after my mum was transferred to this local authority funded care home, I cannot give their name for legal reasons, I noticed a couple of things wrong from the very beginning:

1- My mum needed a pressure mattress and assistance with everything from A-Z. But I often found her left on her own asleep in a dirty chair with no side supports and a pressure mattress!

2- Due to safety concerns my mum had to have her own bedroom. However, this place only provided a shared accommodation and re-located her to a single room just prior to she became very ill.

3- My mum was at high risk of malnutrition and dehydration. At this local authority funded nursing home she rapidly lost weight and had to be admitted to hospital on her third week.

4- Since my mum was doubly incontinent the nursing home had to regularly change her pads. This was of course not the case and my mum eventually caught a nasty infection.

Before I knew it, my mum died within a month! This organisation does not even investigate how long on average patients with certain comorbidity live in a nursing home and how such statistics differs from one nursing home to another. Of course, if such statistics were made available, that would have been a public outcry across the country.

2021幎9月29日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報