Finnrick レビュー 80

TrustScore 5段階評価の4.5

4.5

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

レビュアーのコメントを見てみましょう

5つ星のうち5の評価

One of the biggest names in the RUO space, and with good reason. Finnrick allows you to get piece of mind before using your research materials. The best part , you can submit vials for FREE( quality a... もっと見る

企業が回答しました

5つ星のうち5の評価

Finnrick makes it easy and cheap to test research chemicals to verify purity. Very simple process to register and sign up for testing, and it usually takes less than a day to get a testing ID and ship... もっと見る

企業が回答しました

5つ星のうち5の評価

The process was super easy. The results only took a few weeks and I had them before I needed to use the peptides I had purchased. I was able to learn about the overfill in my batch vials and reconstit... もっと見る

5つ星のうち5の評価

Took a bit longer to get my results back due to a back log of tests. I am very pleased with the communication and professionalism during the process. I received an apology for the delay, which me... もっと見る

企業が回答しました

企業情報

当該企業による記述

Finnrick is an independent testing and ratings platform for peptides, supplements, and other health and wellness compounds. We exist because the sovereign health market has a serious trust problem: too many vendors make claims they can't back up, and too many people are taking risks they don't fully understand. Our approach is simple. We test products, either from samples submitted by the public or from our own direct vendor purchases, and we publish the results. No vendor can pay to influence a rating. No supplier-provided test data gets posted as if it were ours. What you see on Finnrick reflects independent laboratory analysis, full stop. The public can purchase additional services such as endotoxin, heavy metals, or solvents contamination testing, and choose the lab used to perform the test. For a fee, we also offer testing for a growing number of other compounds. We use HPLC-based testing through commercial partner labs, and our publicly available database covers results across 170+ vendors. We also offer free testing for a defined list of compounds to any US resident willing to send us a sample. If you've ever wondered whether what's in the vial matches what's on the label, that's exactly the question we're built to answer. We expect reviews on this page come from members of the public who've submitted samples. We welcome honest feedback: it's the same currency we trade in.


連絡先

4.5

優良

TrustScore 5段階評価の4.5

80件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューの 50%に回答しています

通常24時間以内に回答

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

I’m never be using finnrick again I…

I’m never be using finnrick again I have been waiting for 2 months for results which means most likely they lost it and 1 month for another one and still waiting which I paid for so I will absolutely not use them ever again freedom diagnostics is slightly more expensive but they provide results within a week no comparison the finnrick idea is great and I believed in it but taking so long to test will only make people walk away

2026年2月20日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち5の評価

The process was super easy

The process was super easy. The results only took a few weeks and I had them before I needed to use the peptides I had purchased. I was able to learn about the overfill in my batch vials and reconstitute accordingly.

2026年3月3日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Paid for private testing for 3 samples

Paid for private testing for 3 samples, my name was supposed to be listed as the customer on the COA’s . Received the results all the COAs show Finnrick as the customer. Have emailed them several times and received zero responses to any of my emails. Will never use Finnrick again.

2026年4月9日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Horrible Paid Service and Communication

Absolutely horrible when it comes to getting lab results to paying customers.

They charge over $200 for a test, take 3-4 weeks to get you the results, and don't return your emails when you ask about the status of your results. I wish they got your results back and responded to emails as fast as they charge your credit card.
I could have sent my sample to Jano overseas, paid 1/2 of what finnrick charged, and had my results within 10 days. I would never use their paid service again and don't recommend it.

2026年4月10日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち5の評価

Took a bit longer, but was worth it...

Took a bit longer to get my results back due to a back log of tests. I am very pleased with the communication and professionalism during the process. I received an apology for the delay, which means a lot nowadays! I am very relieved with the results and the explanation of the tests, they were very detailed. Thank you.

2026年4月7日
自発的なレビュー
Finnrick ロゴ

Finnrick からの回答

Lovely to read your kind words, and thanks for your patience, much appreciated.

5つ星のうち1の評価

If the lab can't run a test accurately but only paid vendors can contest it, it isn't really transparent and fair is it?

I initially though what Finnrick is doing is a great way to bring transparency to the industry, however, once I became a customer of theirs I was thoroughly dissappointed.

If you send samples in for testing from vendors who pay to be part of their platform that vendor can contest results when they come back low. This happened to my sample and a week later I was issued a "corrected" report which changed purity and mass. In the corrected report there was no reference or link to the original report. This is SO bad on so many levels. If you test, get one result, then go over the result and find an error, the proper, scientific way to re-issue a report is to have all of that information there - not to hide the old information.

The vendor I used had multiple samples that tested poorly and had corrections reissued. You can track other corrections on Finnrick's site. I find it ODD that one vendor can have different products all testing poorly then get the same corrections, which brings me to my next point....

There are many reports that the lab they use, specifically Krause Analytical is very inconsistent compared to other labs. So with the way FR is set up it comes to two potential problems:

1. Vendors who pay to be part of their platform have the ability to get their results changed, this is a good thing if the results are literally wrong but, if they are literally wrong... why are they using that lab?

2. If the lab is THAT inconsistent, then the results on FR should not be trusted, because my assumption is that only pay-for vendors can request corrections. Which means every other vendor who has been tested there who isn't paying doesn't have the opportunity to correct faulty testing reports.

Lastly, before my correction was issued I paid for an additional test, once it was clear I could not trust this company I no longer wanted to test with them.

FR refused to refund my payment claiming it was "over 48 hours" and went against their "policy" to refund. There is NO policy (at least not at the time of this incident) anywhere on their website. And I LOOKED. Later they stated they would refund me but never did. So now I have to go fight the charge.

Seriously - do not waste your money with these absolute scammers.

2026年3月16日
自発的なレビュー
Finnrick ロゴ

Finnrick からの回答

First, you're right about the refund. It was approved by our team and then not processed on our end. That's our mistake, and is now done. We apologize for the delay and the frustration it caused.

(We've since made our refund policy explicit in our terms.)

Now, on the other points, because several of the claims here are factually incorrect and we want to set the record straight for anyone reading this.

Corrections and vendor influence: Vendors cannot pay to change results. Our correction process is open to anyone: vendors (paying or not), the person who submitted a sample, or any member of the public can raise an objection and provide evidence. Corrections to published tests are listed on the results page, and are all published at https://www.finnrick.com/corrections

Transparency: The correction you're referring to is published on the results page, including the original data point, the updated value, and the reason for the change. It's visible to anyone, logged in or not: https://www.finnrick.com/testing-certificate/tirzepatide/orbitrex-peptides/20260213-e-nwwrwhu

Lab consistency: About half of all Finnrick-commissioned tests are run by Krause Analytical. Every published report identifies which lab performed the analysis, and a full breakdown is available at https://www.finnrick.com/labs Please note we also offer a lab selection option at the time of order.

5つ星のうち5の評価

Peace of mind…

Finnrick has given me some peace of mind while buying from grey market sources...fast and free.
Finnrick is leading the way on peptide testing.

2026年3月1日
自発的なレビュー
Finnrick ロゴ

Finnrick からの回答

Love to read this, thanks!!

5つ星のうち5の評価

Finnrick has been awesome

Finnrick has been awesome, great resource. They are getting very popular and test result times are taking over a month but you can’t beat the free service! 10/10

2026年3月17日
自発的なレビュー
Finnrick ロゴ

Finnrick からの回答

Thank you for the kind words, and indeed we're working to improve turnaround times.

5つ星のうち1の評価

UPDATE

UPDATE: I had my RT40 retested and it came back 99.8% purity. So AGAIN RETEST IF you use Finnirick. Too bad they don’t let you update load photographic proof. Because I got proof.

You all need to take Finnirick pep testing with a grain of salt. They use Krause labs. A noted not reliable lab. A literal joke among labs. Then they rate companies on what this lab says. If you have gotten a negative test result from Krause Analytical, RETEST. You may be pleasantly surprised.

2026年3月17日
自発的なレビュー
Finnrick ロゴ

Finnrick からの回答

Hi,

Our position on Krause is in our previous response, it stands.

On the retest: if you have doubts about a result you received from us, we'd love to hear about it. We'll reach out directly via Trustpilot to get the case details and take it from there.

Also noting the overall pattern here: a poor result, repeated calls to discredit the lab and Finnrick, then a private retest with no disclosed methodology.

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報