レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Esperienza pessima, pos fuori uso,pagamento in contanti senza scontrino,all andata in un 9 posti eravamo 10 al ritorno 12,guida selvaggia e veloce,al ritorno dopo 15 minuti di telefonate senza rispost... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Sono appena arrivata all'aeroporto di Capidichino senza attendere .. il servizio Ú stato veloce ed Il Signor Carlo gentile ed educato come sempre. Una vostra cliente affezionata che vi sceglie se... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Only method of paying was via the RingGo app or calling RingGo, neither of which were working. I sent screenshots clearly showing I was attempting to pay but the app was displaying an “error” message,... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Questo Ú il secondo anno che lasciamo la macchina per un mese accoglienza eccezionale.. ragazzi bravissimi in particolare CARLO ragazzo bravo gentile educato e puntuale ... Lo consiglio .

䌁業情報

  1. 駐車堎
  2. 駐車堎ビル
  3. 駐車サヌビス

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

First Parking utilise cutting edge technology to provide highly innovative, effective and reliable parking management solutions.


連絡先

3.0

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

211件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V, Appeal Rejected

On the day I found the ticket on the windscreen, I tried appealing online, only to find the system conveniently “down.” After countless failed attempts, I had to print everything on several papers, buy develop and stamps, and go to the post office like it was 1987. Strangely, the payment system never seems to have technical issues.
Weeks later, they rejected the appeal by email with no explanation whatsoever — just a recycled response (likely AI generated) repeating the original allegations and pointing again to the same photographic “evidence” that actually undermined their case.
The whole thing feels more like a revenue machine wearing the costume of a genuine appeals process. And of course they refuse dispute resolution — accountability would spoil the business model; why risk accountability when the conveyor belt is running so smoothly?

2026幎5月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Esperienza pessima

Esperienza pessima, pos fuori uso,pagamento in contanti senza scontrino,all andata in un 9 posti eravamo 10 al ritorno 12,guida selvaggia e veloce,al ritorno dopo 15 minuti di telefonate senza risposte,ci dice che ci sono 20 minuti di attesa,dopo 50 minuti ritelefono e mi dice che ci sono altri 20 minuti di attesa..morale della favola si sono presentati dopo 1 ora e 15...Ú durato meno il volo per budapest che il tragitto aeroporto parcheggio. ..mai piu

2026幎4月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

App-based payment method crashed

Only method of paying was via the RingGo app or calling RingGo, neither of which were working. I sent screenshots clearly showing I was attempting to pay but the app was displaying an “error” message, and calls were unable to go through due to the rural location. The inability to pay was not my fault but they rejected my appeal with a blanket statement. My 1 hour visit which I tried over and over to pay for turned very expensive - more money in the pockets of the greedy.

2026幎4月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Callous and uncaring

I received a parking fine for parking at my place of employment. On my last employment day I went to work on-site as usual, only for a week later to be fined. I was previously paying a monthly parking subscription for the area, but emailed to cancel it after my last employment day. They fined me for the day , claiming I was not covered. I could not provide email evidence as my work email was deleted after I left. I appealed the charge explaining the mistake, but appeal was rejected. The reason for the rejection amounted to "signage was clear", which had nothing to do with my appeal, as I parked there thinking I was still covered. Absolute heartless jokers

2026幎4月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Charge for someone else's parking

Be aware that you can be charged for parking for a vehicle registered in another state that has the same registration as your registered vehicle. When I raised this with them to get a refund (awaiting that to be processed), I was confronted by a rather condescending and rude young Man (Josh). Despite my registration being "unique" (Rego number qualified by the state indicator) I was still charged for someone else's parking (same registration different state). They say they cannot guarantee this wont happen as they are not a government entity !!!!!

SOUNDS LIKE A FIRST PARKING problem not a customer problem. Have you not heard of AI or thought to add a STATE qualification on the number plate reader software.

BE VERY AWARE everyone and keep checking your nominated credit card or parking history - or SIMPLY remove your account and park elsewhere.

2026幎3月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible experience with First Parking.

Terrible experience with First Parking.

My family visited Bewl Water and, before leaving the car park, we asked a staff member whether we should pay for 4-hour or all-day parking. We were advised to pay on the way out once we knew how long we had stayed.

We followed this advice and ultimately paid the full-day parking charge before leaving. Despite this, First Parking still issued a £60 parking charge notice. We appealed and provided proof that the parking had been fully paid, but they rejected it anyway.

There was clearly no attempt to avoid paying, yet they still pursued a penalty on top of the parking fee already paid.

This feels like a system designed to generate penalties rather than apply common sense, which they state on their website

2026幎2月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

landlord or companies avoid this first parking service

If you are a landlord or a company looking to use first parking please DO NOT. They are very harsh as I am a driver and I wanted to deliver parcels to residents in the property, it was my first time I made a honest mistake of not knowing where to park and they rejected my appeal and made me pay £60. Now I have informed people to avoid any places with first parking meaning residents will suffer delays due to first parkings lack of support and understanding to drivers working.

2026幎3月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Unfair £85 Charge for 10-Minute Overstay

Very disappointing experience with The First Parking. I paid for two hours of parking and only overstayed by 10 minutes, yet I was issued a £85 parking charge.

At the Tooting location, the payment machine was not working, which meant I had to spend extra time downloading their app and registering before I could pay. This delay was completely out of my control, but it was still used against me.

I appealed directly to The First Parking and then took it further to POPLA, but both appeals were rejected despite providing this explanation.

This feels unfair and unreasonable, especially when the issue was caused by faulty equipment. I would strongly advise others to avoid parking at First Parking sites if possible, as there seems to be no flexibility or consideration for genuine circumstances.

2025幎10月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

First parking (university of Birmingham


First parking (university of Birmingham )is a steal from the staff permit holder, I pay monthly fee ,but can't guarantee a parking space ,no clear parking bay, cars parked everywhere ,First Parking will decided what they like to give "who " a Parking fine ,as they are private owned ,no warning sign for not parking on the space ,but it's rule for pleasing themself ,WASTE time to appeal ,it's their own decision, unless you pay other company to appeal it -extra cost !!

2025幎11月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Paid for parking and got a penalty


Paid for parking and got a penalty notice!!

I paid online for parking with First Parking, and they sent a confirmation that I had paid (Evidence no. 1). On arrival I gave them my reg number and they checked their system and let me in. (Evidence number 2)

They then put a PCN on my car and said I hadn't paid.
They confirmed that I had paid when I boked therefore they are either completely incompetent or scammers!

2025幎9月30日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報