Halcyontraderfunding レビュヌ 

8
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

2.4

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

2.4

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

8件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.4

すべおのレビュヌ

(8)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 8ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Customer Service is absolutely


Customer Service is absolutely horrible. I had passed evaluations on my account not realizing I was only allowed to have three funded accounts active. OK that’s fine. I flew three funded account. I don’t upgraded my fourth one. Lose that account also but I still have an account that is saying it’s disabled. There is no negative balance on it and it actually has two positive trading days. I reached out to Customer Service several times via email. And have received zero response it’s been over a week.

2026幎9月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Just as I see others have described

Just as I see others have described, I passed eval accounts and was upgraded in accounts. From there I had enough for payouts in 3 accounts and requested as such. At that point (they did pay out) however, they closed all 3 accounts I had paid for and put me in a single "TLT" account with different rules and a platform I never traded on before and had no interest in switching. I requested to pass on the "TLT" program and just keep the accounts I paid for and they just said "NO". This appears to be a designed dead end once you prove to be successful and not just feeding the eval re-subscription machine they want you gone. If you just buy eval accounts endlessly and blow them up, you are their ideal customer.

2026幎9月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SCAM Prop- Stay Away

I would give this prop firm a rating of zero.

I started with three 25K Lite Evaluation accounts on WealthCharts. I passed all three, moved into the three corresponding reward accounts (sim-funded), and once I crossed the buffer limit of $1,250 across them, I requested my first payout of $250. Immediately after that request, all three accounts were closed and replaced with a single 50K account carrying a $750 daily loss limit (trailing), placed into something called the TLT program — and on top of that, this new account was created on Volumetrica, a completely different platform from WealthCharts, where every one of my evaluations and funded sim accounts had been running. I never chose Volumetrica, was never asked about it, and have no experience with it.

The TLT program itself turns out to be three more levels — so in effect, I am being asked to pass an evaluation five times over. Each level requires reaching a separate profit target ($3,000, then $4,000, then $5,000), each with its own tightening daily loss limit ($750, $1,000, $1,250 respectively).

This structure looks designed to prevent traders from ever getting paid, not to reward them for passing. It is not a funding program at that point — it is a treadmill.

None of this was disclosed anywhere in their FAQ — not the TLT program itself, and not the fact that it comes with an unrequested platform switch. It only appears after you have already built up profit in a funded account, at which point that profit effectively disappears and you are told to start over, on unfamiliar software, three more times.

Based on this experience, I consider it a scam. Stay AWAY.

2026幎7月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

WARNING: Halcyon Trader Funding (HTF) terminates profitable accounts using false-positive bots and refuses to audit CSV logs

Do not waste your time with Halcyon Trader Funding unless you are prepared to have your account terminated by automated bot errors.
I won an evaluation account (HTF-WC-92243-mrz2xr9c) during an official WealthCharts Masterclass event. I operated 100% within the rules, using standard directional trading on Micro Nasdaq (MNQ).
The Undeniable Numbers:
Total Trades: 20 trades.
Direction: 100% SHORT (-1 Micro).
Performance: 80% Win Rate, +$580 Net Profit ($50,585 balance) with drawdown completely intact ($48,585).
Opposing Trades: 0 Longs. Zero hedging occurred.
The Contradiction & Misleading Support:
On July 27th, after questioning an automated system flag, Halcyon Finance Support (Ticket GAG7WC) explicitly wrote: "If you believe you are not doing this, please proceed with trading as normal."
I followed their official instruction in good faith and continued trading.
Hours later, the account was abruptly terminated for alleged "cross-account hedging / group trading".
Refusal to Review Audit Files:
I provided my official orders.csv execution log proving every single timestamped fill was strictly single-direction Short (-1 Micro). Instead of performing a standard human server audit to fix their bot's false positive, Compliance issued a generic copy-paste rejection and closed the ticket.
Conclusion:
Halcyon’s automated risk engine flags single-direction replicated trades as "hedging", their support gives misleading instructions to continue trading, and their Compliance team refuses to review actual CSV execution data.
Account ID: HTF-WC-92243-mrz2xr9c
Ticket ID: DQITEC

2026幎7月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Changed Their Terms After Purchase Was Made and Gave No Refund

They moved the goal posts on payout terms after purchasing an account. I bought a challenge with this company specifically because of the platform and the payout conditions they offer. After purchasing the account and trading it for some time, I learned they changed their payout conditions to far less favorable terms including a 50% max withdrawal, along with payout caps and minimum 6 $200 trading days. I would not have bought a challenge with them under their new payout conditions, which are entirely terrible in my opinion. They didn't keep old legacy accounts like other firms do, but rather just applied the new terms across the board. In my view it is unethical to sell somebody something based on certain set of conditions, and then make material changes after the fact. Maybe they have some fine legal print that allows them to do this, but I cannot trust any sort of good faith arrangement with such a company. If they do this at the beginning, what tricks will they pull when it comes to payout time?

I decided to add a star on because of their feed with DX and having the light prop version of Deepcharts. It does execute well compared to some other props.

2026幎6月30日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報