レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(1)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 0ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

K9 Wonderland = K9 Horrorland

Our dog was attacked by a rescue dog that was under the care of the owner of K9 Wonderland.
She never called us that morning to let us know. Our vet was kind enough to see our dog that evening after we had picked him up. Our vet was shocked by the injuries. He informed us that our dog would need surgery, but since our dog had eaten dinner, the vet could not put our dog under for surgery that night. Our vet told us to bring our dog to his other vet facility (that he owns) & he would perform the surgery the next morning since that was where he would be working. Our dog had to have 8 stitches - 7 in his ear which was torn completely through and 1 in his punctured cheek. The owner kept saying it was a nip.Then she insisted that we basically shopped around to get stitches (when OUR vet OWNS both facilities & we explained that to her). She still insisted on her version of the story even after we emailed the medical records. She also told us the day after the incident that the rescue was good about paying for injuries, so to send her the vet bills & she would pass them along to the rescue. After weeks of not hearing anything (even though we emailed), we contacted the rescue ourselves & the rescue knew nothing of the attack! Our point to the owner of K9 Wonderland was that IF our dog had injured another dog, we would be responsible and do the right thing by paying the vet bills. Since the foster dog was under her care & she chose to put that dog in with her client’s dogs, she should’ve done the right thing & paid the vet bills out of her pocket. She tried to stall this whole process for 6 weeks & then she started in with excuses & false narratives in her email response to us. She kept insisting our dog tried to hump the dog that attacked him. However, IF that is even the case, a normal dog’s reaction is not to try to rip another dog’s ear off. She’ll probably respond to this with FALSE facts as it appears she has done with the other negative reviews. She even told us that her groomer lied to us because when my husband called later that night, the groomer told him that a dog had ours by the throat. When we got our dog home he was also coughing so badly that the vet said he would need to x-ray his trachea to make sure it wasn’t collapsed. Again-why would the groomer have any reason to lie to us? Obviously, she wouldn’t, but the owner claims the groomer did lie. The owner finally offered to pay for the initial visit (which did not include the surgery) ONLY IF we apologize to her for what she claims was bullying and threatening her (which never happened). She has drawn this whole thing out for 6 weeks thinking we would go away. If she intended on paying anything, she should’ve done it immediately. She was the one who brought up her attorney to try to scare us. When my husband stopped in to have a civil conversation with her, she ended up yelling at him about her personal problems (which was bizarre) & then yelled at him to go ahead & sue her. Of course she states the opposite in an email sent to us. My husband never once raised his voice. We ended up paying over $1800 in vet bills. She won’t even refund sessions that we paid in advance. She’s never offered to show us the video of the entire day–most likely because her version won’t match the video (which she probably deleted). I would urge anyone reading this to look up her other negative reviews & you will see a pattern. One would think that after the other bad reviews she would’ve learned her lesson & called immediately when our dog was injured. I would NEVER trust sending my dog there again. Good luck to those who do because it’s just a matter of time before another review like this is posted. It’s a shame that the owner can’t take responsibility for her lack of communication & poor decision making & just admit she was wrong. Now I see that Duke (the dog that attacked ours) was adopted out. Good luck to the person who adopted Duke. They probably know nothing of the vicious attack. Again, look at the other online reviews & you’ll see the pattern.

2025幎7月9日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報