Documented delays, poor communication, and unresolved dispute
For clarity, our position remains based on documented evidence, not opinion.
The manufacturerâs representative who attended our property acknowledged in writing that the supplied finish differed from the showroom sample we were shown and based our purchasing decision on. We also hold photographic evidence of that showroom sample.
In addition, Kallums acknowledged in writing that the replacement unit had been sitting mislabelled in their warehouse between October and December, contributing to significant delays and repeated disruption to the project. This point has since been omitted from their formal responses despite the inconvenience caused.
The wider issue has never been limited solely to the vanity unit itself, but also the repeated communication failures, incorrect delivery timelines, missed response deadlines committed to during the complaint process, and the need for repeated chase emails, phone calls and showroom visits in order to obtain updates.
We have attempted for several months to resolve this amicably and professionally. References to âformal channelsâ are simply a reflection of the fact that Kallums have declined to offer any financial resolution despite the documented delays, disruption, and additional costs incurred throughout the process.
We will continue to ensure this review accurately reflects both our experience and the ongoing outcome of the matter.








