University of Liverpool レビュー 12

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

3.0

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

企業情報

  1. 大学

当該企業による記述

For the advancement of learning and ennoblement of life since 1881.


連絡先

3.0

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

12件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューに回答していません

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち2の評価

Please don't book Ede and Ravenscroft for photos

Worth having a look at Ede and Ravenscroft's trustpilot reviews before you book them for next year's graduation photos. Photo availability need not be part of the gown-provision monopoly, and imagine the disappointment for your students when the pics turn out to be inaccessible or poor quality.

2025年7月14日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Palestinian Flag 2025 graduation…

Did i see a tutor at a 2025 graduation ceremony waving a palestinian flag.Imagine bringing your political views to the students big day supported by his fellow teachers. If you want to be in that environment then Liverpool is the place for you

2025年7月16日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Terrible!

I'm an ex-student in this university and it really turned into a university of poo like its name. The toilets stink and you can tell what the person ate just by the aromatic stench of death that emanates upon the students' exit. I can declare with confidence that even the room freshener turns into a catalyst in making the smell worse

2024年12月18日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Hello,

Hello,

I am a former student of the University of Liverpool’s EdD program and am currently dealing with some issues regarding the management and delivery of the program, particularly with how it was run through Laureate Education. I would like to know if any other students have experienced similar concerns, particularly in the following areas:

Transparency of Program Operations: Were you aware that Laureate was managing much of the program’s delivery? Did you find that the relationship between Liverpool and Laureate was made clear during your enrollment process?

Instructor Turnover and Qualifications: Did you experience frequent turnover of instructors or feel that the staff lacked the qualifications necessary to effectively support your academic progress?

Financial Transparency: Did you encounter issues with tuition fees, unexpected additional costs, or discrepancies in how fees were handled during or after the transition from Laureate to Kaplan (if applicable)?

Program Quality: Were you satisfied with the structure, support, and quality of the EdD program? Did you feel that the online structure and staff support were conducive to your success?

Course Closure Communication: Were you properly informed about any changes or closures of the program?

I’m interested in hearing from other students who may have experienced similar issues, as I’m looking to collect evidence that could support my complaint regarding the program's operations.

Thank you in advance for sharing your experiences. Your feedback will help me understand if these issues were isolated or part of a broader pattern.

Hello all,

I was a student in the University of Liverpool’s EdD program, which was operated in partnership with Laureate Education. Unfortunately, my experience was far from what I had expected when I enrolled, and I’m now in the process of addressing these issues with the university and the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA).

I am reaching out to see if anyone else has experienced similar issues with the program, particularly around these key areas:

1. Lack of Transparency About Laureate’s Role
From the beginning, it was not made clear to me that Laureate, a for-profit entity, would be heavily involved in running the program. All the promotional materials were branded as if the program was purely a University of Liverpool initiative. I only later realized that many critical aspects—like hiring instructors and managing the curriculum—were handled by Laureate. This has left me feeling misled about the nature of the program and the quality control behind it.

2. High Turnover of Instructors and Lack of Support
Throughout my time in the program, I experienced a frequent turnover of instructors, many of whom were not full-time staff or adequately qualified for doctoral-level supervision. This created inconsistencies in the feedback I received, and I often felt that I was not being given the guidance necessary to successfully progress. I am curious if others faced similar issues with staff rotation or felt unsupported during their studies.

3. Tuition and Fee Issues
After transitioning from Laureate to Kaplan, I encountered several issues with tuition fees and billing. There were unexpected charges, and I never felt that the transition was explained clearly. Has anyone else experienced problems with tuition or unexpected costs in the program, especially during the handover from Laureate to Kaplan?

4. Quality of the Online Learning Experience
Overall, I felt that the program lacked the academic rigor and structure I had expected from an EdD at a prestigious institution like the University of Liverpool. The online format, combined with frequent instructor changes, made it difficult to feel engaged or confident in my academic progress. Did others feel that the quality of the course delivery was below expectations?

5. Poor Communication Regarding Course Changes
At one point, I found out that the program was being closed to future applicants, but this wasn’t communicated clearly to me or my cohort at the time. Has anyone else been affected by a lack of communication regarding important changes or closures within the program?

I am currently pursuing a formal complaint regarding these issues, and I believe it would be helpful to hear from others who may have had similar experiences. If you faced any of these challenges or have other concerns about the program, please share your story. Your feedback will help me—and possibly others—navigate this process and seek the accountability that students deserve.

Thank you for your time and support!

2024年10月2日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Waste of money and time !!!

Waste of money and time !!!! The worst university you can go to. Instead of real quality studies, you get political propaganda . The tutors have zero clue about the material you’re taught . The content is superficial . It’s such a waste of money ! I had to withdraw as I find it completely bizarre my time and money to be wasted in such way . The administration is clumsy, digitally illiterate and disrespectful. Save your money , go somewhere else in Europe to study . It’s a total waste and a very bad performing circus 🤡!!!!!

2024年7月1日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

University of Liverpool online learning master degree course

As a recent student of the University of Liverpool’s master’s program, I feel compelled to share my experience, particularly regarding the course content and teaching methods.

The university, while prestigious and having a rich history, fell short of my expectations in its master’s program. The core issue I faced was the overly basic nature of the teaching content. For a program designed for postgraduate studies, I anticipated a more advanced and challenging curriculum. Instead, the content provided seemed more suited to undergraduate level, lacking the depth and complexity one would expect at a master’s level.

Additionally, the webinars conducted as part of the course were disappointing. They failed to enhance my understanding of the subject matter. The webinars seemed more like a formality rather than a meaningful part of the learning process, offering little in the way of engaging or deepening my comprehension of the course content.

However, the expectations for module assignments did not align with the teaching. Assignments required an in-depth understanding and advanced application of the subject, which was challenging to achieve given the basic level of the course material. This discrepancy between the taught content and the expected level of assignment work was a significant source of frustration.

2023年12月1日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

I wish i could give NO stars

I wish i could give no stars! DO NOT use this university they are biggest scammers!!! They will take your money and keep charging you and give you no degree, I completed my entire degree and still yet to get the certificate instead they just added more fees to be paid even though I paid the full amount.
NOTE: DO NOTTTTT ENROLL IN THIS HORRIBLE SCAM OF A UNIVERSITY

2022年5月22日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Scammer everywhere in this university

Be aware of the red lady person and grindr guys who is scamming you at university, they will ask you to leave for nothing if you're a visitor! report to police/action fraud because they spam liverpool college emails and also. red lady person and joe if you're reading this, you're in big trouble and you will both get excluded forever.

by the way, they copied hilton logo for no reason they will get sued too.

2022年6月2日
自発的なレビュー

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報