レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 照明専門店

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Flappy Casino Casino Review 2026 Flappy Casino is an online casino platform offering slot games, live casino tables, and instant win games. The platform regularly updates its promotions and game selection. With multiple payment options and a simple interface, Flappy Casino provides an accessible online gaming environment.


連絡先

3.0

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

2件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

betflappy.com “€4,500 Withheld After KYC Completed – Account Closed the Moment I Requested Withdrawal”

I am writing to formally submit a complaint against Flappy Casino (operated by Altacore N.V., Curaçao Registration No. 151002) regarding the unjustified closure of my account and the withholding of €4,500 on 17 April 2026.
Background:
I have been an active and verified customer of Flappy Casino for over 12 months. During this entire period, the operator accepted all of my deposits without raising any compliance concerns, verification issues, or policy violations. My deposits are fully documented on my bank statements under the merchant name Kryptonim, which is the payment processing entity used by Altacore N.V. / Flappy Casino.
What happened:
On 17 April 2026, immediately after I requested a withdrawal of €4,500 and successfully completed the KYC verification process, Flappy Casino abruptly closed my account citing a “duplicate account” policy. The operator claims my current account (manuel97) is a duplicate of a previous account I had opened and formally closed over a year ago in accordance with responsible gaming practices.
Why this is unjust:
1. Inconsistent and selective enforcement
If my account was considered a policy violation, the operator had 12 full months and numerous deposit transactions to identify and flag this. Instead, they chose to enforce this policy exclusively at the moment they were faced with a significant withdrawal obligation of €4,500. This is not compliance — this is selective and predatory enforcement designed to avoid paying out.
2. KYC completed — identity fully verified
I successfully completed the full KYC process, submitting official identity documents. The operator is fully aware of who I am. Using KYC as a gateway to confiscate funds rather than to verify identity is a direct abuse of the process.
3. Previous account was formally closed
The account flagged as a “duplicate” was closed by me in accordance with responsible gaming practices. It was inactive and held no funds. Opening a new account after formally closing a previous one is not a violation under any fair interpretation of responsible gaming policy.
4. No prior warning, no communication
At no point during 12 months of active play did the operator contact me regarding any compliance concern. The account closure came without warning, without explanation beyond a generic policy citation, and without any offer of resolution.
Evidence available:
• Bank statements (Postepay) showing all deposits under merchant name Kryptonim
• Email correspondence with Flappy Casino support
• Documentation of KYC completion
• Record of withdrawal request dated 17 April 2026
• CGA complaint reference (complaint already filed with the Curaçao Gaming Authority on 18 April 2026)
Resolution requested:
I request the immediate release and payment of €4,500 — the full balance present in my account at the time of closure.
I have already contacted Flappy Casino directly and filed a formal complaint with the Curaçao Gaming Authorit. Both contacts have been notified. I now turn to trustpilot as an independent third party to assist in resolving this dispute.

2026幎4月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Ho conosciuto il sito sui social e


Ho conosciuto il sito sui social e inizialmente ero un po titubante perche non c’erano recensiioni. Ho pagato con paypal e tempo 2 giorni ( nelle isole!!! ) il pacco Ú arrivato perfettamente integro e imballato. Che dire la lampada ricaricabile Ú stuoenda!! <3 assolutamente consigliato il venditore molto disponibile

2022幎6月11日

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報