レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

8件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Threatening customers

I previously left a review sharing my honest experience, which I have evidence to support. After posting it, the owner contacted me on WhatsApp asking me to remove the review. He mentioned wanting to resolve the situation and offered compensation but did not specify what that compensation would be, only saying that they had plenty of products and could offer discounts.

During the conversation, he tried to delegitimize me as a customer and even called me a “Karen.” He then wrote, word for word:

“Anyway we made 100k a month for 3 months in a row now.”
“If you don’t remove the review.”
“Good luck.”

Taken together, those lines read as a thinly veiled threat — a boast of financial clout immediately followed by an ominous warning. It felt like an attempt to bully me into silence and implied that they could and would use their resources against anyone who spoke out. This was intimidating, aggressive, and entirely inappropriate. Is this really the way this company deals with customers?

By the way, i have evidence to support my claims.

2025幎10月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Customer experience

I’ve placed multiple orders with this company and, as far as I’m aware, the products are good quality. However, my overall experience has been extremely disappointing due to their customer service and order management.

I placed five orders, and only three were actually delivered — but even those had mistakes:
• First order arrived 20 units short.
• Second order arrived with 70 units extra (which I returned).
• Third order arrived 8 units short and over a month late.

Orders 4 and 5 (placed in July) were never delivered at all. While delays can be understandable, the real issue was the company’s false promises and inconsistent communication.

A major problem was that they would say one thing via text and later go back on their word, blaming “miscommunication.” For example, they confirmed I’d receive a 50% refund for both orders 3 and 4 if not delivered on time, but when the time came, they only honored the 50% for order 4 and refused it for order 3. Even the 50% refund they did issue was later referred to as a “deposit” — in September, they claimed I had to pay it back once I received the goods, despite the fact that I never received them. They then insisted I already had the goods (which I repeatedly stated I did not), ignored my responses, and even threatened legal action — only to later discover they had targeted the wrong person.

I also had a phone call with the owner, Tyrell, which turned into a prolonged back-and-forth. He repeatedly interrupted me, failed to address my concerns, raised his voice, and boasted about his company’s success (VAT registration, large order numbers, etc.) instead of focusing on resolving the issue. Only after this back-and-forth did they acknowledge the mistake and apologize.

When I tried to resolve the situation, they repeatedly cited their “trust policy” (keeping 20% if a product is cancelled) but ignored the fact that under the Consumer Rights Act, customers are entitled to a refund if products aren’t delivered within the agreed timeframe.

The company also appeared to have no proper tracking of customer orders, which caused confusion about the deposit for order 5, as well as refunds and deliveries.

To be fair, despite all these issues with orders 3 and 4, we eventually reached an agreement: they applied a 50% refund on order 4 (which they later treated as a deposit in September) and provided a £200 discount on order 3. They eventually issued remaining refund for order 4 & 5 however this was 2 months later. As part of the compensation, they also presented a product at a “discounted” price, failing to realise I had already paid a deposit for this product a month earlier (order 5). However, the additional compensation they promised in September was never provided, and the entire process involved weeks of chasing and back-and-forth communication.

To be clear: as far as I’m aware their products are good quality, but their customer service, order tracking, and communication are chaotic; they regularly go back on their own promises; and the way they handle customer complaints is unprofessional. This review is an honest reflection of my experience, and I have evidence to support everything stated above.

2025幎9月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Scammer, thief and unprofessional

Terrible experience, The products are poor quality, cheap packaging, and nothing like the advertised photos. Customer service was just as bad: extremely slow to respond. Save your money—there are far better and more trustworthy brands out there. If I could give no stars I would.

2025幎5月29日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報