The New Homes Ombudsman Service レビュヌ 

8
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

2.2

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 仲介サヌビス

圓該䌁業による蚘述

The New Homes Ombudsman Service exists to help customers resolve issues with their new homes, which the Registered Developer has been unable or unwilling to fix. The remit of the New Homes Ombudsman Service covers the whole period from the Reservation and Legal Completion of a property through to after-sales and complaints management for issues during the first two years of a new home purchase. The primary purpose of NHOS is to provide a free and independent service to customers, which can impartially assess and adjudicate on issues that have arisen that fall within the Ombudsman’s scope. This includes complaints around the Reservation, Legal Completion and complaints management processes, or issues or defects that have arisen at or after occupation and which are not major defects.


連絡先

2.2

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

8件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(8)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 7ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Just like other broken regulatory


Just like other broken regulatory bodies, the New Homes Ombudsman Service (NHOS) is a total farce. They are completely out of their depth, demonstrating zero understanding of structural, legal, or developer-related realities. Instead of operating as an independent, unbiased referee for homeowners, it is abundantly clear that they exist to shield and protect corporate developers rather than resolve genuine consumer issues.

Their handling of complaints is shocking. They actively deny the escalation of valid disputes and consistently fail to follow their own published procedures. They create a bureaucratic brick wall designed to exhaust the homeowner until you simply give up.

If you expect fairness, accountability, or professionalism, you will not find it here. They lack the spine and the competence to hold massive building firms to account. An utterly useless service that actively works against the consumer—do not waste a single second of your time with them.

2026幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

50 Shades of collaborated


It's just 50 Shades of collaborated corruption, with developers and any organisations that fall, under the same umbrella! All you will receive is incompetence, unprofessionalism, sheer laziness, continuous misinformation, disregard for your wellbeing and additional stress. An absolute waste of time by a body, 'claiming to be independent'. They'll ignore most of the evidence you provide, disregard the 'hell' the builders put you through following in excess of 150 snags, over 170 contractors visits, 3 NHBC visits and endless professional reports within 1.5 years of moving into a mis-sold property. They will just side with the developer and disappoint you further with their ignorance and utter negligence! Private homeowners are disadvantaged in so many ways and this, is just another example!

2026幎4月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Absolute waste of time and enormous


Absolute waste of time and enormous effort. £100.00 compensation because anything else is disproportionate...totally totally inadequate and honestly, dont waste your time. Almost a year we had to wait and they agreed with us but the compensation awarded is actually laughable.

2026幎4月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Pointless and misleading

This is scheme funded by developers and designed to provide buyers with false sense of security, while in practice they take months to “investigate” any complaint, and offer next to zero protection for the buyer. They need to be regulated out of existence

2025幎11月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

A pointless process that offers very little protection for buyers

I went through the full complaints process with the New Homes Ombudsman and, after months of supplying detailed evidence, photographs, emails and written statements, the final outcome was exactly what I expected from the start. The developer contributed almost nothing, avoided most communication, and provided very limited information, yet their position seemed to carry far more weight than mine.

The entire structure feels weighted towards the big developers who fund and support the scheme. As a buyer, you are encouraged to document everything and follow every step, only to find that unless you have the sort of written evidence a developer would never provide, your complaint is likely to go nowhere.

In my case, the Ombudsman dismissed multiple issues, accepted explanations from the developer without supporting evidence, and treated a tiny hedge that grows to 60 to 80 cm as a reasonable replacement for a 204 cm solid screen. I genuinely do not see how this helps any homeowner who has been misled or let down.

The process is polite and procedural, but ultimately it felt like a long exercise that offered no real protection or accountability. If you expect a fair balance between homeowner and developer, this is not it.

2025幎11月19日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報