レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The market for US Forces in Iran (Apr 30) resolved Yes erroneously. This was a 300$+ million market that was manipulated by large whale gamblers via Uma where they could put 750$ securities for... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM guys don’t deposit they always manipulate outcomes in favor of whales i tried to claim $21 that I won, but it never appeared in my balance support is terrible they don’t respond at... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

UMA Whales use economic power to push votes to sides that may not be right according to rules. By rules set for the US x Iran ceasefire, the event on April 7th does NOT match the rules, however, th... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I bought $50 worth of NO for "U.S. force enters Iran by April 30". To this day there was no ground invasion, but a ceasefire. However, it resulted in YES. All the comments under this bet are saying th... もっず芋る


連絡先

1.3

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1.5

500件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Max the goat of assistance <3 


I had an large issue to recover some cash i sent to the wrong wallet , I was stuck for days and days making me MAD, then Max came around from the polymarket team , and yea i got the best help I could wish for ! and its all fixed now ! <3
not allways perfect but they try very hard , you got your selves a new loyal user !!

2026幎4月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Tuve un problema con unos fondos que


Tuve un problema con unos fondos que envie erroneamente por mi culpa, eligiendo un par erroneo, y en menos de 30 minutos, tenia a un agente ayudandome en el proceso, en cuestion de 15 minutos con un poco de feedback de mi parte, se soluciono, y pude recuperar mis fondos perdidos!!!!

10 ESTRELLAS!!!!!!

2026幎4月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

scaaaaaaaaams guys don't deposit

SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM guys don’t deposit they always manipulate outcomes in favor of whales i tried to claim $21 that I won, but it never appeared in my balance support is terrible they don’t respond at all. Stay away from these scammers

And I won’t even get started on the $4k I lost betting "no" while the outcome was “yes” on a ceasefire between the US and Iran on April 7 which didn’t even happen

2026幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I am disappointed because everything is


I am disappointed because everything is just a scam! I have not been able to get my funds out of this company. They are full of empty promises, and they will never release your withdrawal. I know #Crop#Mines................# to be exceptional in all their services and assure steady payouts without any problem.

2026幎4月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SCAM SCAM SCAM

If you think about prediction market follows rules and facts to resolution, think again, the UMA is based on which side UMA whales bet on, basically who has the most money to sway their interests. The rules written by each market, doesn't matter at all. It's a straight up scam. I will never touch this piece of garbage ever again. So many people been scammed by the US-Iran ceasefire market, me too, i lost 20k, let's learn the lesson here and let this polyscammarket die.

2026幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

It is a scam

It is a scam

I made a bet that the US x IRan war will come to a cease fire after the 7 of April but whales said ended up saing yes and not no so polymarker made the answer YES sothat the whales can win what a scam even tho the correct aswer was NO becasue the cease fire was only the 8 of April

I wount trust this site at all , they dont go with the correct they go with the whales

2026幎4月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

THE WORST SCAMMERS

THE WORST SCAMMERS

**Formal Note on Disputed Resolution – US–Iran Ceasefire (April 7 Market)**

The market was resolved as **YES**, however, this outcome is disputed based on verified facts.

Both sides only issued **conditional statements**, not an unconditional ceasefire agreement:

* Trump proposed a ceasefire *subject to conditions*.
* Araghchi responded with a *conditional halt* only if attacks stopped.

Additionally, **hostilities continued shortly after**, with missile alerts reported across multiple regions, indicating no effective ceasefire was in place within the deadline.

Even subsequent reports described the situation as a **“conditional ceasefire”**, not a confirmed or operational one.

**Conclusion:**
There was no mutual, unconditional, and effective ceasefire before the deadline. The YES resolution appears inconsistent with the actual events.

If such discrepancies are not addressed transparently, it raises concerns about fairness and the influence of large stakeholders on the outcome.

This matter requires serious review.

2026幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Should have checked reviews first - Avoid!

Wish I had read other reviews before transferring any money to this platform. Big mistake. My balance now shows zero and their customer support is non-existent - no responses, no help whatsoever. I should have done my research first - would never have sent funds if I had. Save yourself the trouble and avoid. Learn from my mistake and check reviews before using this service.

2026幎4月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The uma voting is a scam

The uma voting is a scam, if you’ve got money you win, why hasn’t polymarket done anything about it, they done this on the straight of Hormuz being closed last month, now the ceasefire which wasn’t a ceasefire. What a joke. #polyscam

2026幎4月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

A votação das Forças dos EUA no Irã (30


A votação das Forças dos EUA no Irã (30 de abril) votou "Sim" erroneamente. O resgate de pilotos abatidos não se enquadra em "operação terrestre deliberada" — é circunstancial e explicitamente excluído pelas regras ("Pilotos abatidos... não serão contabilizados"). Isso configura uma falha de mercado excepcional: ambiguidade nas regras + contradição ética (a Polymarket anulou as apostas de resgate de pilotos, mas permite lucro por meio dos socorristas). A votação da UMA provavelmente foi manipulada (precedente de grande porte: acordo de US$ 7 milhões com a Ucrânia). "Não" está de acordo com a letra e o espírito da regra; "Sim" é uma manobra semântica. Exige-se uma análise de falha de mercado quanto à ambiguidade, inconsistência e risco de manipulação.

2026幎4月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Really bad.Lost about 300 dollars.The


Really bad.Lost about 300 dollars.The problem is that the bet doesnt matter if you are right or wrong.The thing that matters are the guys who have milions of voting tokens.They decide the outcome of the betting.not the truth I will sue polymarket and i hope the owners of this scam market gets what they deserve.

2026幎4月9日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報