レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Range is stuck between robo-advisory and quality personalized financial advice. It is too expensive for the mixed-experience middle ground it delivers. Response times are measured in days not hours, a... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Range has been excellent! I left my advisor a few years ago because the 1% asset management fee was starting to add up. I'm getting comparable or better advice and paying a fraction of what I was be... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

For the price, I love that it covers nearly everything (tax planning/filing, investments, budgeting/planning, etc). The budgeting features work great for me, more than what I was getting with a standa... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Paid $5k for the membership, but regrest it. (1) The web app is incredibly buggy, or slow, if its working at all. (2) The annalysis the application provides is superficial at best, but worse i... もっず芋る


連絡先

3.3

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3.5

35件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Paid $4,000+ for Platinum-level service


Paid $4,000+ for Platinum-level service and got one 30-minute call before April 15. No proactive planning, no strategic guidance — just a last-minute extension notice and me doing my own capital gains reconciliation. For a situation with RSUs, an LLC, rental income, and significant trading activity, I expected a lot more. The platform is fine but the advisory depth isn't there. Not worth the price for anyone with real financial complexity. Hoping to cancel shortly!

2026幎4月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Range has been excellent

Range has been excellent! I left my advisor a few years ago because the 1% asset management fee was starting to add up. I'm getting comparable or better advice and paying a fraction of what I was before, for my assets to sit in ETF's and other stocks. Highly recommend this to anyone in any tax bracket.

2026幎3月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Mixed quality advisory; wants to be software only

Range is stuck between robo-advisory and quality personalized financial advice. It is too expensive for the mixed-experience middle ground it delivers. Response times are measured in days not hours, and getting a reply often requires proactive follow up or even badgering. No phone number to call. Even simple trades take days to execute. If and when you can schedule a call with their team (always a fight to do so), they're great on the phone and generically helpful. Nobody spends any time dedicated to your account so advice is educated (CFP) but generic. Tax filing has been fine but not differentiated. I look forward to canceling my service.

2026幎3月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Not worth the price

For the price I expected more seamless service especially around tax preparation and filing. Our tax case that doesn't feel very special (MFS) is causing a lot of issues for them so we had to paper file, giant waste of time.

Range requires you to do a lot of upfront setup work with little in return. While a dashboard across account is fine its also a commodity that I can get much cheaper and with less bugs elsewhere (copilot money for example).

The real benefit of range working with these inputs feels nonexistent as it requires so much manual work for taxes when they have access to every account and transaction. Cumulative I probably spent as much time as I would have on Turbotax but at a 10x price.

The investment recommendations were almost comically complex to execute on your own. I suspect that may either be generated or designed to convert me hand over asset management which would tie me to a $5k a year fee indefinitely. The price to value ratio is way off.

2025幎10月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Great value for all in one

For the price, I love that it covers nearly everything (tax planning/filing, investments, budgeting/planning, etc). The budgeting features work great for me, more than what I was getting with a standard finance app - I have been doing more in depth planning and projections. Rai (the AI) has been able to answer a lot of my questions as well, but glad to know there are humans available just in case.

2025幎11月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Pleasantly surprised

I've been with Range since 2024 and for the most part have had a solid experience.

Pros:
- I really like the team approach. There are multiple experts that understand my situation deeply. I thought i wouldn't like this when I signed up, but it turned out to be way better than expected
- their services include personal taxes. I was a client at another brokerage and would never get advice on taxes or estate planning
- the fee is flat
- they introduced AI a year ago and its very intuitive and really good

Cons:
- the account connections can be better, though I'm not sure who is responsible for that. Either way, could be better
- they say they're all in one but they don't file business taxes
- i have assets in India but they don't provide advice on international accounts

2026幎2月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

worst experience

worst experience. The rudest sales person Dylan I had the unfortunate experience of booking a call with. Wish I had never booked a call. What a waste of time. Services so overpriced.

2025幎11月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Not the value advertised

Weak. Not as advertised. I specifically asked about STR Tax Savings and calculators in sales process and was assured all these items were readily available. They are not and every appointment is days/weeks out for any guidance or assistance.

2025幎11月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

The investments platform is weak

The investments platform is weak. It doesn't show enough detail to be useful. If you have different brokerage accounts, this platform doesn't bring them all together in a way that you can use it. You still have to go to each brokerage site to see information that is useful for an investor. I wish I didn't spend the money for this service.

2025幎11月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I've really enjoyed working with Range

I've really enjoyed working with Range. I started about a year ago when I was trying to really start learning about my finances and didn't want to pay an AUM fee to a financial advisor. Range has helped me with my decision to let go of a Variable life insurance policy, helping me understand how the money I invested into the policy would go much farther in a brokerage account invested into the market and has also given me a retirement analysis that helps me understand how to save towards my goals. I wish that they were a little bit faster at responding with analyses (sometimes up to 4 weeks), but the value is incredible and I'm happy with my experience so far.

2025幎10月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Patient and responsive

Our experience with Range has been very positive. They’re patient and responsive, and provide great peace of mind when questions come up or entertaining what-if scenarios.

You’re paying for human advice, not AI, so we’re completely ignoring “Range AI” as an offering (not sure why someone would choose to ask AI for a potentially wrong answer, instead of just asking a licensed advisor you’re already paying for, but I guess everyone is trying to figure out how to leverage AI these days)

2025幎10月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Consolidated platform + professional support

The biggest value I get from range is the organization of all my accounts, and having access to professionals that can give advice based on my specific situation. The platform is easy to work with if you have accounts that are able to maintain live connections. Human advice is most valuable and has been useful. The AI tools are generally helpful but not sufficient so glad they still have people to work with as well. I'll revisit this review if that changes, but for now, it's working great

2025幎8月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Paid $5k for the membership

Paid $5k for the membership, but regrest it.

(1) The web app is incredibly buggy, or slow, if its working at all.

(2) The annalysis the application provides is superficial at best, but worse its usually wrong. Range.AI (its beta, but still) is comically wrong in its advice/analysis.

(3) I had my onboarding call, and weeks have gone by without an analysis, plan or contact by an advisor.

2025幎7月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible as a fiduciary and tax planner

Range seems convenient. They watch all things financially for you. They have a nice dashboard that connects it all. That's where it stops.
There financial advisory team is terrible. I've lost more money due to there lack of guidance. They are supposed to be a fiduciary - I haven't heard from an advisor in over 8 months and this is all with the current tariff market volatility.
On the tax side they are even worse. They advised me on setting up an LLC and the instructions were completely wrong. This February they did a preliminary review of my taxes. I was glad to see I was getting a significant refund. When they finally completed my taxes, we discovered they'd made a mistake and it reduced my refund by $40k! They owned up to making the mistake, but not once did anyone reach out or offer an apology. Tax planning was the top reason I signed up and they couldn't even get estimates correct.

2025幎4月26日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報