Rumora レビュー 1

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

3.2

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら


連絡先

3.2

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

1件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューの 100%に回答しています

通常24時間以内に回答

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

この企業を閲覧した人は、以下の企業も閲覧しています。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

Unreliable trial, unclear metrics, and early loss of paid access

EDIT (re: the company’s response):
Their reply continues the same pattern I experienced throughout: selectively framing and twisting facts instead of standing behind the “risk free guarantee” as a customer would reasonably understand it.

On the 100K guarantee: I have a screen recording from day 7 showing Rumora’s own dashboard displaying under 100,000 views. Rumora now claims a higher number exists in “auditable database tables” that customers cannot access or verify. If eligibility depends on internal tables instead of the dashboard customers are shown, that should be clearly disclosed upfront.

On my “impressed” quote: That quote is real, but it was my initial impression within hours of signing up. After further use, the tool repeatedly targeted irrelevant content, generated nonsensical comments, and many were flagged as spam.

On the login issue: I did not forget my password, and my password was never changed. Their login system simply stopped accepting the correct password. When I tried resetting it, the reset link was broken (it looped back to login instead of allowing a password change). Rumora later acknowledged in writing 3 days later: “We’ve identified the cause of the login issue and it has now been fully resolved.” (Their words: login issue, not “user forgot password.”)

On access being revoked: My paid access was revoked early after a billing dispute. Regardless of whether they call that “standard,” it does not change my experience with the product or the guarantee.

I’m leaving my original review intact because it reflects what happened and what I can document.

ORIGINAL REVIEW:
Rumora was unreliable and not transparent.
Their “7-day risk free guarantee” was not honored in my case, despite me having documented evidence (screenshots, screen recordings, and emails) showing I was under 100k views within the 7-day window. Their explanation also changed over time, and they ultimately claimed refund eligibility is based on “auditable database tables” that customers don't have access to in their dashboard.
I also lost ~3 days of the 7-day trial (almost half the trial) due to a broken login/password reset flow. Support acknowledged the issue but didn’t follow up until days later, and then said it was fixed earlier without notifying me.
On top of that, the AI discovery repeatedly targeted irrelevant videos and generated nonsensical comments. Many comments were quickly flagged and removed as spam.
After a billing dispute, the CEO became hostile, and my paid access was revoked 11 days early even though I was told I’d retain access for the full month.

I can’t recommend this service.

2026年2月10日
自発的なレビュー
Rumora ロゴ

Rumora からの回答

𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁:

𝗢𝗻 "𝗵𝗶𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗻" 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮: The reviewer claims their dashboard showed "under 100,000" on day 7. Their screenshot referenced actually showed 99,851 reach on day 6 — one day before the assessment period ended, just 149 short. By day 7, they had reached 124,851 (24.8% above the guarantee). By day 8, 174,923 (74.9% above). We explained this at the time and offered to export the raw data. Our pricing page FAQ explains exactly how reach is assessed before purchase.

𝗢𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲: The reviewer forgot their password. They reported the issue on Friday at 4:45pm. We sent a working password reset link by 6:40pm the same evening — under 2 hours, outside business hours. The reviewer confirmed receiving this email. They chose not to use it until Monday, then claimed they "lost 3 days." During that time, our platform continued operating: 208 videos discovered, 127 total videos added, 721 comments generated, and 65,801 upvotes applied. The service was never interrupted.

𝗢𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱" 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲: The reviewer now confirms this quote is real. They emailed us on day one saying they were "pretty impressed" after seeing their comments rank #1 with upvotes — which is what our platform delivered.

𝗢𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱: The reviewer filed a chargeback with their bank citing "Product Unacceptable" as the reason — then emailed us asking why they couldn't continue using the same product they had just told their bank was unacceptable. Access is suspended during payment disputes. This is standard practice. The contradiction speaks for itself.

𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗿: This reviewer has posted 4 reviews on TrustPilot — all 1 star. We encourage prospective customers to consider this context.

We won't be editing this response further. Full documentation is available upon request.

---

𝗢𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲:

We want to address this review with facts from our documented records.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗱, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱.
Our guarantee promises 100,000 reach in 7 days. This customer's campaign reached 124,851 (24.8% above) on 7th and 174,923 on the 8th day — that's 74.9% above the threshold. The guarantee was fulfilled. Refund eligibility requires being under 100K, not over.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴.
On day one, this customer emailed us: "I have to say I'm pretty impressed with the ability to rank comments #1 with so many likes without them getting taken down so far... pleasantly surprised."

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝟮 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀.
The customer reported a login issue on Friday at 4:45pm. Our team sent a working password reset link by 6:40pm the same evening — under 2 hours, outside business hours. The customer initially claimed we "removed Google OAuth." We have never offered Google OAuth.

𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸.
The customer filed a chargeback with their bank claiming "Product Unacceptable" — while simultaneously asking why they couldn't continue using the same product they claimed was unacceptable. During an active payment dispute, access is suspended. This is standard practice.

𝗢𝗻 "𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗲" 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
This characterization is false. We have retained all email correspondence. Our responses were direct and factual. We are prepared to share the complete email thread with any third party upon request.

𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆
• Campaign reached 174,923 (74.9% above guarantee)
• Customer said they were "pretty impressed" on day one
• Login issue resolved within 2 hours
• Chargeback filed after refund was declined
• Access suspended during active payment dispute

We delivered nearly double the guaranteed results. The full email correspondence and account data are available for review.

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報