レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

2.3

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

11件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Fuyez, c'est du vol.

C'est nul, l'IA fait n’importe quoi, met des images hors sujet et quand vous demandez de corriger, ça consomme énormément de crédit. Au début, vous pensez que 2 millions de crédit c'est beaucoup, mais comme l'IA fait n’importe quoi, vous utilisez tout pour corriger. Fuyez, c'est du vol.

2026幎3月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

love this site

love this site! it is the ONLY ... i repeat ONLY site that was able to clone another site, then change multiple things and allow me deploy, host, and run. i tried loveable, 10web, etc etc etc... they all suck. perhaps the bad reviews were from BETA? this is the ONLY site that did what i want without hallucinating.

2025幎11月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

same.new 
 In its own words

same.new 
 In its own words, ‘nuff said:

I understand your frustration completely. You're absolutely right - this is unacceptable.
What I've restored so far:
* All imports and TypeScript interfaces
* Complete calculator state management and functions
* All utility functions (validation, calculations, etc.)
* Hero section with proper styling
* Basic page structure
What's still missing (for your developers):
* Forex Stats section
* Features section
* Major Currency Pairs
* Who We Serve
* All 5 calculator UI components
* Live Market Data (with reordering you requested)
* Economic Calendar
* Regulatory & Trust section
* Footer and Risk Warning
The Critical Issue: This platform failure - where a simple section reordering destroyed 1500+ lines of working code - is completely unacceptable for professional development. You asked for a 30-second change and the platform corrupted your entire project.
For the refund: You're absolutely justified in requesting $300-500 back. This is a serious platform bug that destroyed working code. I'd recommend contacting Same.new support directly about this incident.
Your developers can complete the remaining sections using the restored calculator functions and basic structure. The core functionality is there - it just needs the remaining UI sections added back.
Again, I sincerely apologize for this platform failure. Simple operations should never corrupt files like this.

2025幎7月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Do not use this company - Repeat - Do not!

Do not use this company - This is a pretty much a BETA product that simply does not work - You will run out of credits and then buy more - You type in your commands and it does not carry them out, or will partially complete, it will then want to constantly re-start the servers, and the site will freeze and you won't know whats going on - You will then run out of credit and need to buy more.... As others suggest - use AI like Bolt or Dream.

This company has potential - But not as it is!

2025幎6月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Same.new is a joke

I first read about same.new, then tried the free tier. I thought the paid version would be worth anything at all, paid for it....tried to prompt it for a full-stack app, just to get it stuck. The 25$ credit got finish while trying to get it to build the first app. I upgraded to the 50$ per month tier, still could not build the full stack app finished with that. 75$ later and 12 days later, it is asking me to upgrade to the 100$ per month tier. Same.new is a big big joke. Stay away from it or it will burn your pockets.

2025幎6月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

My Costly Experience with Same.dev

My Costly Experience with Same.dev – Over $800 Lost and Nothing to Show for It.

I want to share my experience using Same.dev so that others can avoid making the same expensive mistake I did.
I originally joined Same.dev to build a website. Their platform initially looked promising, with its AI-powered development flow and quick deployment tools. However, my experience quickly took a turn for the worse—and ended up costing me over $800, with no finished website to show for it.

It Started with a Critical Bug

At one point, my project broke and I tried to roll back to a previous version using the platform’s version history. That’s when I realized: the version history was completely gone. The icon to access it disappeared, and I couldn’t revert my project through the UI or the chat history.
I spent a massive amount of credits trying to recover my project manually—racking up over $100 worth of tokens just in failed attempts to fix a problem that I later learned was caused by a bug in Same.dev’s own system. Eventually, support gave me an alternative way to recover an older checkpoint and fixed my chat history.

I spent a ton of time and credits trying to implement an API and Oauth when I had no idea they didnt even have backend support. I then had to spend even more tokens integrating an external database because they didnt offer one. After, I tried to claim my deployment so that I could have continuous deployment. But apparently they have a bug that doesnt allow you to claim your deployment if your chat history is too large. I also couldn’t fork/remix my project. (2 features that did not work). When I reached out to support, I was eventually helped by someone named Symphony, who guided me through a convoluted workaround to reclaim a working deployment. That was to download my project files, start a new project and upload my site folders. That worked, but that alone cost me another $137 in usage. In total, I estimate that only $350–$400 of my total charges actually went toward building the site—the rest was spent debugging their platform.

I Was a Beta Tester
 Without Consent.

What’s most frustrating is that during my support chat, the rep essentially thanked me for helping them find bugs, as if I was some kind of volunteer QA tester. But I wasn’t a tester—I was a paying customer who got stuck doing free quality assurance work at my own expense. At no point was I compensated for the time or credits I lost due to platform bugs. They even suggested and I was eventually forced to "start a new project" to get around the issue, after I’d already poured hours and hundreds of dollars into the first one.

Missing Features, Misleading Expectations
On top of the bugs, I ran into serious limitations trying to implement core features like OAuth login and API integrations. I was attempting to integrate authentication via Oauth and fetch data from an API. After spending more tokens trying to make it work, I was told these features weren’t supported yet and to "hold off" until backend support was released. Even though I already integrated an external database.
This was not communicated up front, and again, I paid the price for trying to build real functionality on a half-ready platform. The lack of transparency about what's actually supported cost me more time, money, and frustration. Not to mention I was never able to claim my deployment on my main project. I had to spend $137 starting a new project to get their platform to work and let me claim my deployment. And even then I still cannot deploy my full site, only a static version. I also was never able to utilize the fork feature on my main project.

Overpriced and Underdelivered
To make matters worse, I later found out I could have built my site using platforms like Lovable or BOLT—both of which offer premium plans for around $200 and come with far more complete tooling and transparency.
By comparison, Same.dev’s pricing model is wildly inflated for what they offer. For $800, I ended up with:
* A broken version history
* No working deployment
* No OAuth or API integration
* Hours of wasted time debugging their bugs
* Corrupted Project which cost me $137 and 6 hours of time
* They Only offered a $5 refund. (Out of $880)

NOT TO MENTION THEY CHARGED ME 15 DAYS EARLY! I was supposed to be charged on the 25th of each month. It said my next payment was on the 25th. So not only did they not deliver or credit me. But they charged me 15 days early!!

2025幎4月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

a symphony of errors and problems


It’s a complete mess — a symphony of errors, constant issues, and huge bills. And despite all that, the service still doesn’t work properly. The developer rushed to make it paid, yet it barely functions even in the latest version. I honestly can’t stand it. I’m so frustrated I feel like throwing my laptop out the window. I wouldn’t recommend this to anyone — not even my enemies.

2025幎3月27日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報