レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

企業情報

  1. 法律事務所
  2. 法律家
  3. 法律サービス

さまざまな外部ソースから提供された情報

Saunders Law is a specialist litigation & dispute resolution law firm based in the heart of London's legal district. Contact us today for expert help & advice.


連絡先

2.3

期待以下

TrustScore 5段階評価の2.5

7件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューに回答していません

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

Run away

If you are implicated in a domestic matter that includes abuses you have been subjugated to, please run away. They will side and agree with the CPS and judge, while completly dismissing your lived reality of coercion and abuses, to the point of not presenting it to the court and paint your reactions as intrisic to your personality. Change their opinion every two days - highly unreliable and probably the biggest mistake I made in my case, a duty solicitor would have been way better.

2025年11月25日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Money Grabbing and useless

My son was arrested with 3 other people, Saunders decided to take on all 4 as clients whilst on Duty. My son had two different people sit in on interviews with him, and a completely different person represent him in court. I was in court when my son was given bail, we drove the two hour journey home, and at about 7pm I received a call from Lucy Watson to say, your son was give bail today, Joke.
I was never given a telephone number, nor a follow up call, no information at all, the only time My son heard from them was a letter he received, AFTER we had tried to engage another solicitor, as Saunders were now worrying about losing money. Several attempts to get y son;s legal aid transferred to another solicitor have been contested by Saunders, despite them still representing another defendant and it being a conflict of interest. They are not interested in engaging with any of their clients and will turn up on the day with about as much knowledge on the case as they do now. Only interested in not losing the legal aid money- They are criminal

2025年6月30日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Dangerous Ethical Breaches and stolen money

@Saunders_Law
My review is lead with direct experience with the firm.
Alistair parker stole from me and continues to dispute costs when owing up to the appropriate refund would be the most satisfying response. You were the one that phoned me not the other way around ten seconds before I fired you.
Karan sent paper documents against my consent to my address as I have never dealt with legal matters in paper format. Karan sent the papers against my consent, with intent to ignore clients wishes of how they want their personal information handled she did this to cause me deliberate distress and to hope my documents were opened by others than myself. I returned the papers once, she sent them again weeks apart, I returned them again. Requesting repeatedly to stop handling my legally privileged information in this way as it's breaching the gdpr legislation and putting my personal affairs at risk if lost or stolen. Before sending my documents the first offence, Karan is emailed 5 times not to do so. Therefore, if this was not on purpose, I would aver Karan is computer illiterate and cannot read or write, I wonder if that will be apart of her defence. Wrote 'to the occupier of the house' without confirmation of my address. The documents had been returned, she sent them again. Such behaviour will be answerable to a number of regulatory bodies in the uk. Receptionists of firms are employees of the firm and when fines are awarded for negligence it is not to individuals it is to firms. Ie James Saunders. I emailed the owner and no response from Mr Saunders. I have made the commissioners office aware of the dangers of her actions towards protecting client information, which is also of interest to other regulatory bodies. Karan a substandard receptionist is committed to coming out of her role as a desk worker and her comments are usually if not always, condescending, inappropriate and her attitude and behaviour is not professional. She will put your information at risk if she does not like you and Karan made it very clear after sacking Alistair she did not like me, which her wholly displaced attitude sees no ends in sight. She does not belong at this firm. Karan did this knowing the contents of information was of a medical/legal nature which carries heavy fines from the Commissioners Office, this should also put all who respects and seeks to uphold the protection of their personal information to avoid this firm. The firm cannot identify vulnerable clients and my lawyer Ali Parker picked a barrister that was not equipped for the case even though as of this date he remains paid and did not act for me. He said he knew the judge how weird is that. Avoid and protect yourselves, they will not win your case for you which is why I had to sack Alistair on the spot. Karan will seek to ignore clients requests of how they want their data used and shared and in what formats. Karan will do so with intent to risk your information of legally privileged content. Karan has become a liability to her place of employment. Do not use this firm, there had been comments also made at the reception desk to me in 'jest' regarding the percentage lawyers get before the partners which was in turn, slagging the owner off, they don't even like their own firm. I also asked for a meeting face to face with my lawyer or the owner of the firm to which they wouldn't face me and all respectable firms would absolutely invite a client into a private meeting room. Which shows, respectable is not apart of their ethical values at the firm. For all clients seeking a law with respect and integrity you must not use this firm and you must ensure you find a law firm that with every employee represents you and your needs and what you stand for and the correct representation you want. If this is how she treats high paying clients I wonder what troubled internal issues are with them as a company, their reviews on glassdoor are equally as bad from employees.

2024年8月27日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Another bogus firm who advertise action…

Another bogus firm who advertise action against the police but want customers to leave name and telephone number before they even advise you if they will accept the case or not.

Most firms who want a clients details when they do not want to take the case on, . why do you want people’s details if your firm is not taking on cases. This is a sinister agenda behind this only these firms know.

Avoid at all costs another useless firm false advertising action against the police.

2023年4月1日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

What a bad experience!

What a bad experience! Without knowing all the facts, Matthew believes that our company is impersonating their law firm to forge letters, yet we are just victims. This man and his law firm are illogical and not professional! After I gave all the evidence, I just asked for his apology and didn't reply, arrogant and rude! How can such a lawyer protect his defender? Don't be fooled! This lawyer and law firm is terrible!

2022年8月11日
自発的なレビュー

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報