SubmitLink レビュー 

My personal opinion is,song genre is a problem, I received feedback from blues curators,heavy rock cutators,and some other genres I dont know their exect genre,my opinion some one from submit should listen to a song,forward to suitable playlists,otherwise its just money and time wasting

Nice business idea and it feels actually quite human!

the service is legit

This was a good way to get on some playlists and also get feedback on what people like and didn't like.

Simple and straight forward. I like it.

excellent service 5 star

These are playlist farms. They may have a lot of followers, but the actual number of listeners is tiny. For example, a playlist with 10,000 followers might only have 500 real listeners.

A huge number of the playlists you submit to will reject you, so you’re basically paying for nothing. And even the playlists I did get accepted to didn’t generate a single stream or even one view for me.

You might as well just make your own playlists and add yourselves to them — at least then you wouldn’t have to pay for it.

Great experience, a lot of playlist, I like it.

Good experience overall! Very recommended.

I am very satisfied with its effectiveness.

I’ve had a great experience with Submitlink. The platform is easy to use, reliable, and makes the whole process simple and efficient. Everything was handled smoothly, and the service has been professional throughout. I would definitely recommend Submitlink to anyone looking for a convenient and trustworthy solution.

SubmitLink is a great website to pitch your songs to playlists. I really enjoyed the process of matching songs to playlists.

It is a very useful website:))

Helped me massively highly recommended well worth using the service

Very affordable compared to other promotion platforms. My songs got twice the exposure for half the price.

„Még nincs sok tapasztalatom a platformmal, de már az első próbálkozásom több száz megtekintést és meghallgatást hozott a dalomnak. Egyszerűen használható, gyors, és eddig nagyon pozitív élmény.

amazing, love it, highly recommend

Most curators have very low share rates — check them carefully before spending money

I tried SubmitLink with multiple songs and curators, and after my experience I won't be spending any more money on the platform.

My biggest issue is the extremely low share rates of many individual curators. SubmitLink suggested playlists for my songs, and being new to the platform, I assumed their suggested matches were reasonable places to submit. Had I paid closer attention to how low some of those curators' actual share rates were, I never would have spent the money.

That's ultimately on me for not digging deeper before paying, but I also don't think playlists with very low acceptance/share rates should be presented as recommended matches without making that fact much more prominent. When you're paying $2–$5 for each submission and the curator gets paid for reviewing the song whether they add it or reject it, the incentives don't feel particularly favorable to the artist.

The feedback I received also made me question how useful these paid reviews really are. I submitted two tracks by the same artist to the same curator. On one track, the curator specifically praised the vocals and said the voice sounded great, but declined it because the song supposedly needed more power and energy. On the other track, the same curator praised the energy, lyrics and flow, but then criticized the vocals for sounding too computerized or robotic.

Music is subjective, obviously, and I don't expect every submission to be accepted. Rejection isn't my complaint. My problem is paying for feedback that can feel inconsistent enough that it isn't particularly useful.

What really soured me on the system was the timing. Two curators waited until the final day of the seven-day response period to review my submissions. If they had not responded within the deadline, I would have received the submission cost back as SubmitLink credit. Instead, the submissions were declined at the end of the period and the curator was still paid.

I think SubmitLink should change that incentive. Curators who respond quickly could receive the full payment, with compensation progressively decreasing the longer they wait. A curator responding on the last day shouldn't be compensated exactly the same as someone who listens and provides thoughtful feedback on the first or second day.

SubmitLink may work well for some artists, and the platform itself is easy enough to use. But based on my experience, I strongly recommend that artists ignore the fact that a playlist is "suggested" and look very carefully at each curator's individual share rate before spending anything.

For me, the combination of low share rates, inconsistent feedback and a payment structure that rewards a curator for rejecting a song even at the very end of the deadline simply isn't worth the money.

I tested it. I learned from it. I won't be using it again.

I want to thank Aaron Whittington very much for running a successful Spotify campaign for me. Five different playlists have added my piano composition *JEUX*. 5 Playlists: Music Victory, Driving in the rain, Indie, instrumental and chill playlist, Musica rilassante per un bagno caldo, Echoes of Elegance.