レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(1)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 0ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Injured untrained doggo

I waited a while to write this review because I genuinely hoped Juan would make things right—but unfortunately, he has not. I'm now left with an untrained dog, serious behavioral setbacks, and I am emotionally and financially exhausted.

If you don’t read the whole review, here’s my advice:
Get all expectations in writing before you drop off your dog.
When you pick them up, do a full head-to-toe health check. Especially the neck!
If Juan is as reputable as he claims, he should have no issue documenting what he says he’ll deliver.

Why I Hired Doggo
I initially contacted Juan to train a new foster dog I had for six weeks, named Charlie. I told him upfront that Charlie had crate anxiety, leash reactivity to other dogs, and poor obedience in public. Juan told me these issues couldn’t be handled in the 3-week program, so I paid for the 5-week board-and-train.
Charlie already knew basic obedience—sit, down, heel—but couldn’t do it under distraction. In the first week, Juan worked on things Charlie never struggled with, like potty training and jumping.
By week two, I noticed he wasn’t training Charlie in public, even though that was part of the deal. When I raised this, he called me and said, “Trust the process,” claiming that public training comes after private progress.

Throughout the five weeks, Juan sent nothing but positive updates:
“Charlie is doing amazing.”
“He’s very dog friendly.”
“He’s excelling.”
But when I picked Charlie up, the tone changed. Juan said Charlie was “stubborn and hard” and admitted “he bit me.” This was never communicated before.
Once home, I saw little to no improvement. When I reached out again, Juan said I wouldn't see results for two more weeks—that’s why he doesn’t check in right away. But Charlie’s behavior was out of control. I told Juan I was considering leaving a review, and instead of addressing my concerns, he offered to pick Charlie back up for three more weeks of “advanced” training. I agreed, hoping he would finally follow through on what he promised.

What Happened Next
Three weeks later, Juan returned Charlie to me at a Home Depot. During the go-home session, every time I used the e-collar, Charlie yelped loudly. Juan said:
“He fakes it to get out of training. Keep using it.”
I followed his instructions. But after a few days of consistent yelping, I checked and found two wounds on Charlie’s neck—one of them actively infected. The vet later confirmed these were caused by prolonged or improper use of the e-collar.
I stopped contacting Juan until I had confirmation from the vet. Then, I asked him for a partial refund—not even the full $4,000 I paid. I asked for $1,400 (for the “advanced” training) and $300 (for the vet bill). He never responded again.
I had to go through a third party to get a single response—he defended the training results but offered no accountability for the injury or lack of transparency (I added his response and my counter response).

Where We Are Now

Charlie has now:
Bit four people since the training—something he had never done before.
Seen multiple professional trainers and behaviorists who agree he’s a difficult case because of anxiety and fear, not stubbornness.
Been in weekly day training, private sessions, and obedience classes—all of which I pay out-of-pocket.

I don’t blame Juan for Charlie’s anxiety, but I do hold him responsible for:

Injuring my dog and dismissing it.
Hiding behavioral red flags during training.
Ghosting me after I asked for accountability.
Selling me basic obedience while claiming to handle behavioral cases.

I asked Juan for an in-person consultation before starting the program, and he refused—telling me he’d trained dogs for years and knew exactly what Charlie needed. I trusted that. I shouldn't have.

Final Thoughts
If you have a fearful or anxious dog—work with a certified behaviorist, not a board-and-train obedience program. I learned that the hard way. I'm not out for revenge, but I don’t want others to waste their money or risk their dog being harmed like I did.

Feel free to contact me directly (Email Tabletop03 at gmail)—I will share every email, vet bill, and message I have. I wish I had known better, and I hope this saves someone else from the pain I've gone through.

2025幎1月26日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報