The Murder Trial Live レビュヌ 1,088

•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

4.2

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Fabulous actors who had to learn so many lines and story good although you were not given enough evidence to be able to say guilty or not guilty. I would have taken 3 stars off for the guildhall in... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

We’ve had a great time this evening, the actors are fantastic and even found ourselves laughing at parts. Something completely different we haven’t done before and would do again. However the tables a... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Tips: High tea isn't worth anywhere near the cost - take your own snacks. It's a long show so definitely take cushions for the hard blue plastic fold-up chairs. Drinks are average show pric... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Really enjoyed it. It was a great follow up to the Post Mortem. The cases set by the prosecution and defence were good the whole thing was great like most things the refreshment prices are ridiculous... もっず芋る


連絡先

4.2

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

1088件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Worth seeing once

Pretty good thought it would be better, with the limited time available i felt we didnt have enough evidence and that will have impacted the verdict for many other jurors! The inflatable tent is very cool and we enjoyed the show, but would not come back for another show. Wouldn't pay full price for the tickets but we were fortunate to have half price tickets

2024幎7月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Went today, left after 30 mins.

Went today, left after 30 mins. It was an absolute HOT BOX in the room, there was 100+ people crammed in to a tiny blow up house with no air con. Everyone was fanning themselves with menus, including the actors.

Honestly, even without the heat - it was just boring. It wasn’t a trial, there were no notebooks for us to take part, no folders with evidence, just some tv screens with the one closest to us not even working. Felt like I had paid £60+ to watch a school lecture. Don’t waste your money

2024幎7月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Acting generally excellent, Directing poor.

The acting was generally of a very high standard but let down by poor unrealistic direction. Whilst acknowledging the problems of condensing what would probably be a 3 month trial into 3 hours, the judge's lack of control of the courtroom may have added to 'the theatre' but greatly detracted from 'the reality' of court life. I am speaking as a retired murder incident room detective who has regularly given evidence in Crown Court. The over-the-top argument between the two Barristers and a witness and then even the judge, took the whole thing down to a level of Am Dram farce. Even jurors who had never been in court knew this would never be allowed to happen. This judge needs to control her courtroom much more effectively and speedily.
The blatantly misleading opening statement for the prosecution and the Dective Inspectors emotional, unprofessional and therefore unconvincing evidence just weren't believable. If the DI gave her evidence in a more neutral professional manner which would not include arguing with the defence Barrister like a truculent teenager, her lack of experience could still be challenged and the bad evidence handling covered in a more realistic way.
Other procedural inaccuracies, such as witnesses placing a hand on the bible while 'affirming', and the judge reading out agreed statements instead of the relevant Barristers, are simple but important things to alter.
There were also obvious gaps in the examination of used evidence. For example the fact that both brothers were gay was never clarified, and no motive for the female's murder was ever mentioned, never mind established.
I strongly recommend some re writing of the script and that the Director consults with a police expert to improve this otherwise entertaining show. All my points were also raised by many non-expert jurors who have watched enough TV Court Drama to know the Director has got it wrong to an extent that it detracts from the excellent acting.
I'd also advise against spending an extortionate £8 on the programme as it doesn't add anything to the experience accept expense. The Classic High Tea was delicious!

2024幎7月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Great Show

Very good actors and actresses! Cant wait for the 2nd half. Brummie deffo votes for the Reform Party 😂

2024幎7月20日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報