TrueProfile.io レビュヌ 607

•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

3.9

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

1. True profile is very prompt in replying . 2.Very professional in their dealings. 3. Probably true profile needs to be a little flexible and not go by the book. This is true for cases which are h... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Everything was perfect. However it gets confusing as documents are loaded on a different screen than the one that says verify and passport or ID you just have to guess if it is a part of verification... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I got my work experience certificates verified on time without delay. Joe Monares has been very helpful and answered all my emails when I needed to ask about few things. Joe also did help me to uplo... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I feel 5 Star rating is very much appropriate for the True Profile team. Well, because they are very prompt and perfect in getting the certificate even before the dead-line. In case of any query from... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 人事コンサルティング

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

TrueProfile.io is powered by the DataFlow Group, a company which has been serving the PSV needs of government entities, authorities and companies around the world since 2006. By being built upon blockchain, TrueProfile.io’s aim is to provide these services in a modern environment which ultimately provides applicants with a portable, digital, professional portfolio while providing employers with the verified information they need to make the best hiring decisions.


連絡先

3.9

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

607件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Mode of Study in the system needs clarity

Dear DataFlow Support Team,
Greetings !
I would like to bring to your attention an important concern regarding the mode of study mentioned in my verification report. Your system provides only three selectable options for the Mode of Study:
1. Active Enrollment
2. Part-Time
3. Distant Education
However, Full-Time is the universally recognized and standard mode of study for PhD programs worldwide. Before initiating the verification process and paying the USD 120 fee, I contacted customer support and clearly explained that my report must reflect the Full-Time mode of study. I was informed that this requirement would be customized appropriately in the report, as stated in the email dated February 22, 2026. Unfortunately, the final report now states “Active Enrollment” as the mode of study. This terminology is unclear and does not explicitly indicate whether the program was Full-Time, which creates confusion for authorities reviewing my academic credentials. Your customer support team has informed me that “Active Enrollment” translates to Full-Time study. However, this explanation is not reflected anywhere in the official report. Without a formal clarification or justification from DataFlow, the reviewing authority may misinterpret it. Since the terminology used in the report is not self-explanatory, I kindly request that DataFlow provide an official clarification letter stating that the DataFlow verification system supports only three modes of study: Active Enrollment, Part-Time, and Distant Education.
The term “Active Enrollment” in the DataFlow system corresponds to the Full-Time mode of study, meaning the candidate was actively enrolled in the program and not studying through part-time or distance mode. Please understand that this matter directly affects my professional credentials, career, and employment status. Therefore, I request your cooperation in providing a clear and logical explanation through an official clarification letter.
Without such clarification, the purpose of obtaining this verification report is unfortunately not fulfilled.
Sincerely,
FACULTY MEMBER

2026幎3月9日
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Bad experience

Bad experience. They are not professional as they assume, they do not reply fast.They do not know the details and all rules of the process.I regret paying for their service.Once they get the money in their pocket, you know after : you had done a false choosing them.

2025幎9月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

5 Star rating

I feel 5 Star rating is very much appropriate for the True Profile team. Well, because they are very prompt and perfect in getting the certificate even before the dead-line. In case of any query from the dispatching authorities - they reply very fast and sort out the issues at the earliest.

2025幎12月8日

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報