レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Unsatisfactory business practices. They impose a time limit on the pages you buy, which reflects poorly on their customer service. Once you've utilised the service, the cost seems inconsequential to t... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

СреЎО всех сервОсПв прПверкО текста Ма плагОат выбралО ОЌеММП этПт сервОс, так как зЎесь ПптОЌальМая "цеМа-качествП". ХПрПшее качествП прПверкО. ОператОвМПе реагОрПваМОе Ма прПблеЌМые О техМОческОе Ме... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Queues too long for a paid service, sometimes can go up to an hour which is horrid compared to other paid and even free plagiarism-checkers. Also doesnt accept direct credit card payments, only PayPal... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

scam website..states plagiarism where there is none! Just makes students anxious...Rather trust Turnitin similarity report at your own uni...or free plagiarism software...!!! Makes me really angry...S... もっず芋る

䌁業が回答したした

䌁業情報

  1. 教育機関
  2. パ゜コン アクセサリ店
  3. ゜フトりェア䌁業

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

Unicheck is a professional, innovation-driven, and comprehensive software for preventing plagiarism. It helps institutions worldwide to make students well educated and successful. Unicheck’s intelligent scanning system checks texts against 40+ billion unique web pages (the biggest online databases using real-time web search and open-access repositories). Unicheck can also be easily integrated into the most popular Learning Management Systems, where it complements LMS functionality without interrupting native workflows. Reports are generated automatically, streamlining work, and giving educators more time for strategic and interesting tasks. We serve more than 1.5M students and 100K educators from over 1.1K institutions in 69 countries around the globe. The Unicheck team is comprised of talented developers, computational linguists, and education industry experts. They all share the noble mission of creating community-driven software that improves the educational process and helps students succeed. That’s why, along with the growing capabilities of the checker, Unicheck also offers free solutions for the educational sector to promote high standards of academic integrity worldwide. Learn more at https://unicheck.com/


連絡先

2.6

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

123件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Unsatisfactory business practices

Unsatisfactory business practices. They impose a time limit on the pages you buy, which reflects poorly on their customer service. Once you've utilised the service, the cost seems inconsequential to them. It feels as if they've taken my money without fair value in return.

2023幎8月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

If you like using Bing, you'll love Unicheck. Otherwise...

Bunch of things. For starters, with a Personal account you can't do Side-by-Side comparisons. Fine, fair enough. But then when I took a close look at the report turns out it missed over 50% of the items that were copied directly from a wide variety of business news sites. For each of them, pasting the text into Google brought up the page in the first result. When I enquired with customer support, the explanation was: "Our system uses Bing search engine, unfortunately some texts are indexed in the Google only". Um, ok. Yeah. I think that pretty much says it all.

When I asked about a refund I was told: "Our service is non-refundable. It’s stated in our customer agreement which you had opportunity to read and agreed while creating an account."

Guess I missed the part about their reliance on the Bing search engine.

Use at your own risk.

UPDATE: After saying goodbye to my $10, I tried the same doc again on Scribbr. Yes, it cost $20. That's why I went with Unicheck in the first place. But let's just say you get what you paid for. Scribber found at least 2x as many items that were copied from websites. Also, I went for it because, unlike Unicheck, they had a 100% Happiness Refund guarantee. So there you go. Good luck.

2021幎11月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites

Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you.
For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism.
The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk.
It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure.
While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model.
I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here.

Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.

2021幎6月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Horrible.

Le doy una estrella porque no se puede dar 0. Compras 50 páginas y resulta que cada página ellxs la cuentan como 250 palabras!!! como una cuartilla de página. Timo total y absoluto. Deberían cobrar por palabras entonces y no por página, hace que sea un engaño. No puedo estar más disgustada ni sentirme más engañada. Horrible. Estafadores.

2020幎9月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Queues

Queues too long for a paid service, sometimes can go up to an hour which is horrid compared to other paid and even free plagiarism-checkers. Also doesnt accept direct credit card payments, only PayPal. Helpful and fast support team, though.

2020幎6月2日
自発的なレビュヌ
Unicheck ロゎ

Unicheck からの回答

Dear Arthur,

Thank you very much for sharing your feedback. It is very important for us.
We would like to investigate the case more thoroughly in order to find the possible reason for the issue you have faced. Usually, the processing time for a 3-5 page document is several minutes. If it is a longer paper, it will surely take more time to scan the document. Unicheck’s real-time search covers over 40 billion pages across open access and educational databases, as well as the web index. On average, it takes no more than 20 seconds to process 1 page.
We strive to deliver only the most accurate and up-to-date results within a short period of time. Thus, we would be very grateful if you could inform us of the time when you submitted the check.

We offer various payment options to our clients. Still, taking into account the regulations of your region, some of the payment methods may not be available there. In any case, our Support Team will be glad to consult you on this issue and offer the most suitable payment method for you. Please feel free to contact us at support@unicheck.com, https://unicheck.com/contact-us/ to get more information and choose the most suitable payment method.

Thank you,
Unicheck Team

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

ЧуЎПвОй сайт Ўля перевіркО вашПгП 

ЧуЎПвОй сайт Ўля перевіркО вашПгП ЎОплПЌу. Все швОЎкП та чесМП! РекПЌеМЎую)

2020幎5月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち4の評䟡

Unicheck

Today is my first time using unicheck. I can testify that in comparison with other checking websites, unicheck is one of the best. It is easy to use and able to pick up what other checking sites are not able to detect.

2020幎5月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

ПтлОчМый сервОс!

СреЎО всех сервОсПв прПверкО текста Ма плагОат выбралО ОЌеММП этПт сервОс, так как зЎесь ПптОЌальМая "цеМа-качествП". ХПрПшее качествП прПверкО. ОператОвМПе реагОрПваМОе Ма прПблеЌМые О техМОческОе МеОсправМПстО. МеМеЎжеры пПстПяММП Ма связО. Бывают ПчеМь хПрПшОе акцОПММые преЎлПжеМОя пП прПЌПкПЎу. РекПЌеМЎую.

2020幎5月30日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報