レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I received a parking ticket on an empty street because one of my wheels was slightly over a faded and barely visible line going over a club car empty bay. The road markings were so worn that it... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SO SAD the council appear to be using an Airbnb on Camborne Road, with individual rooms with individual keys as a “recovery centre”. Police have been out arresting tenants , who appear to have... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I made a phone call to correct the dates and charges for the council tax. Although the waiting time was rather long, the male customer service representative was extremely helpful in resolving the iss... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Yet again another missed food waste collection. Had problems when the system started, then it was OK for about 5 weeks, but it back to normal 2nd consecutive missed collection Come on wandsworth, h... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

  1. 䞍動産管理䌚瀟

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

Information on business support plus local and community pages.


連絡先

2.3

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

29件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.3

すべおのレビュヌ

(29)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 14ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Wandsworth "Quick Start" so poor!

Wandsworth so called "Quick Start" was a sad joke. Occupational therapist who visited spent most of her time trying to insist on completely different processes than the patient (elderly and with dementia) could follow. Seemed inexperienced (no understanding of dementia, can you believe???) and only following the diktats of the system rather than trying to find ways that would actually work.

As a result, necessary services were denied! None of those who contacted me appeared actually willing to help, only looking for ways not to support those suffering and in pain! Their ugly practice of calling with 'number withheld' made them seem even more inadequate.

By contrast, the district nurses - one visited daily - were reliable, polite and efficient.

2024幎11月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

I made a phExcellent Customer Service: Council Tax Issue Resolvedone call to correct the


I made a phone call to correct the dates and charges for the council tax. Although the waiting time was rather long, the male customer service representative was extremely helpful in resolving the issue. It's a shame I didn't ask for his name. I'd like to express my gratitude to the gentleman I spoke with at 3 PM on 29th July.

2024幎7月29日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wandsworth council are a waste of space


Wandsworth council are a waste of space on every front. Maybe if someone there could speak English it would be helpful. Nothing dealt with, they just find an excuse to bat it back and noone signs their names to their letters or emails. The entire shambles needs to be taken down and rebuilt, particularly the planning department. Council tax may be cheaper than other boroughs, but we still don't get what we pay for, it's a rip off.

2024幎5月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

DISabled By "ENable" Tooting Tree Officer

For the attention of Mr BARRY SELLERS - Senior/Principal Planner at Wandsworth's LPA "Urban Design and Conservation Section"

Prevented from saving my Oak I'm forced to risk "Acts of God" Disasters

Answering a complex email I wrote to Wandsworth LPA's Enable tree officers manager on 06.06.2023 I gratefully received his assurance that my Oak's envisaged Planning App. would be treated "as fairly as all other applications we receive". For I've been suffering bad experiences with international + local neighbour-developers ["Devs"] trying to bankrupt me out of my home of 52+years since 2002. eg They often using matters re one of their own trees between 2002-2021; which maybe why the manager also sent a copy of his reply to Barry Sellers on 12 June?

TODAY I happily read online Barry Sellers "A 21st Century Tree Strategy for Wandsworth". But I did find one possible scenario missing from it. ie The status quo of my 3-4 storey high 100-year-young Robur Oak in my private garden in a Conservation Area [designated so in 1992]. For its branches partially overhang St Cecilia's C of E School side driveway beside its 2021-built new classroom Block. And:

With c.1000 persons at different times able to use that driveway and classrooms, including members of the PUBLIC, any one or more of them could conceivably suffer horrific consequences due to possible failures of the Oak's ?many diseased branches or even main stem.
And when the Public are threatened by a Dangerous Tree [as I Notified + a Report to the LPA in my Planning App. 2024/0217 on 22 Jan this year] Enable officers legally should act quickly.

Some of the Oak's vast trunk-like sized upper branches display bare, split-bark patches and some are definitely bending + buckling under their own weight for the first time ever. Also I believe both weeping and/or rotting red-brown canker has visibly badly compromised one particular branch [needing to be removed immediately] which I'm prevented from doing by Enable. Whilst crazily:

Both Forestry Commission people and the author of an Unusable £175 forced-upon me ground-view Report [full of lies] told me that I can do whatever I wish with the Tree, lying that it is "Not in a Conservation Area". So I'm left with no-one to trust at all. And No officer has ever come to look at the Oak or advise me. Plus although we are in Enable's Putney/Wandsworth area:

Tree Officer Liam Hutton of Tooting area has insisted that I obtain an expert Report + Specification of Works needed before I can save the Oak from further failing. But my own Notification + Report is of course inadequate and No truthful tree surgeons or surveyors wish to be involved.

FOR A WHOLE YEAR I've been ostracised and/or ignored and last August I wrongfully trusted eg one company to do a Tree-climb Survey - they cancelling a 9th December date one day beforehand; then only on 9th Feb 2024 coming to give me a ground-view quick look.And finally I was sent the useless Report which I'd asked them Not to write and which included ?Devs photos from a different secret, sunny day!

It appears that the mightily powerful real-estate Devs have been scuppering all my efforts to protect St.Cecilia's people, the Public + the Oak's health too. So I can only assume the DEVS ACTUALLY WANT ACTS OF GOD to bring disasters in order to try to legally sue me for negligence + huge damages now Wandsworth's LPA has tied my hands completely. And fine local Tree Surgeons plus Surveyors here work frequently with these highly influential Devs who seem to have groomed them to ignore and/or deceive me.

Thus I'm left literally legally awaiting any major "Acts of God" which I pray [in all directions] may not harm any humans or property at St.Cecilia's School or at other neighbours properties at 23, 25 + 27 Sutherland Grove; all of whom could possibly suffer badly.

from - MJ - [Mrs M J Tirimo: Mon 06.05.2024]

2024幎5月6日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報