レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

3.3

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3.5

件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.3

すべおのレビュヌ

(1)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 0ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Negative review of Yacht Centar Baotić and Marine Project Inc

Want to share here our story chartering catamaran Mila (Zadar) in order to prevent our troubles to others. We didn’t check online reviews of Yacht Centar Baotić d.o.o. before chartering the yacht — and maybe we should have. Working with this charter left us with a really bad aftertaste.

At the end of July, we came to Croatia for a week and chartered Catamaran Lagoon 50 Mila (Zadar) from Yacht Centar Baotić d.o.o. through Marine Project Inc. We’ve been chartering yachts for 12 years, including Lagoon 50, 51, and 52, so we know these boats pretty well. Issues started to pop up right away during the initial inspection. The yacht was dirty, as if after a sandstorm, and the bimini construction wasn’t factory-made but some DIY replacement, there was no original sprayhood, just a piece of something self-made — such way steering with splashes coming in was impossible, and all the cushions were non-original without the standard clips, wet and dirty. And that was only the beginning.

The cherry on top was the generator behavior on Catamaran Lagoon 50 Mila (Zadar) — it was shutting off after approximately 15-20 min of work (which can’t be detected during checking unfortunately, we did 5-mins run test). The boat has 7 AC units, water heater and some standard equipment like battery charger and inverters. Generator simply couldn’t handle the load and kept shutting off. Okay, breakdowns happen. On its own, this might not have affected our review of Yacht Centar Baotić d.o.o. and Marine Project Inc. that much.
We called charter and here we heard a lot of interesting thing, like: generator must never be used underway, only stationary (!!), try switching off water heater (explanation that on the way it works from engines — didn’t help), generator was never being designed to fully supply all AC units on the boat (!!!)
 While we continued to insist this is not normal situation charter sent technicians.

But then the mechanic came, and things got worse. First, he suggested running not 7 but only 5 AC units at a time. But even then the generator shut down after 20–30 minutes. Then he tried turning off the water heater — didn’t help either. Eventually, he even told us that the AC system and generator weren’t meant to be used at sea but only in the marina — which is absurd, since marinas have shore power for that! After 4 (!) hours of trying, we were told the Catamaran Lagoon 50 Mila (Zadar) needed major servicing
 But when we asked to swap yachts, the answer was a flat no. In the end, because of the lack of working AC and uncertainty of future generator plans, we had to cancel an already booked and paid overnight trip at sea.

All this things and specially attitude trying to prove absolutely absurd things made us feeling really bad and we expressed our frustration to the charter, proposing them to compensate this. Yacht Centar Baotić offered us €1,000 in compensation. That’s it. When it’s obvious that what should have been refunded is the difference in charter cost between a yacht with functioning full-AC and one without it — which Catamaran Lagoon 50 Mila (Zadar) clearly was. And that difference is way more than €1,000. The logic is simple: you pay for what you actually get! Instead, our request was basically brushed off
 And that was the final straw that pushed us to write this negative review of Marine Project Inc. and Yacht Centar Baotić d.o.o.

To be clear: this whole story isn’t about money. What matters to us is honest, responsible service from a company we had planned to use more than once. Now we’ll have to think twice and look elsewhere — and recommend others do the same. Because there are other charter companies out there besides Marine Project Inc. and Yacht Centar Baotić d.o.o., and their reviews are clearly much better. And be very careful about Mila catamaran, it’s full of surprises.

2025幎7月31日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報