Codeleap レビュー 

1
•
TrustScore 5段階評価の3

3.2

レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

3.2

まあまあ

TrustScore 5段階評価の3

1件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

最近のレビュー依頼の記録はありません

この企業は最近、顧客にレビューを依頼していないため、レビューが全体の意見を反映していない可能性があります。

ネガティブなレビューの 100%に回答しています

通常1カ月以上経ってから回答

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

3.2

すべてのレビュー

(1)

過去12か月のレビュー数: 1件

レビューを書く

レビューの確認を行います

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち1の評価

Using Codeleap for Website development

In 2020 I used Codeleap for an app idea I had whilst the company consisted of just Kamil (Ryszkowski) and Victor (Gimael). Over the course of '20/21 the app was built and I was impressed with the communication, quality of work, responsiveness, planning, documentation, etc. At the latter part of the Project Kamil left CodeLeap to presumably pursue other interests.

For context, the app work utilised 66 development days, at a cost of ~£28,000. I then decided to build a website to complement the app, continuing to use Codeleap. The reasonable assumption would be that the website would take as long as the app to develop - in fact it should have been far less as the bulk of the back end e.g. database schema, screens, etc had already been built. Unfortunately, this is where things started to go wrong, with imo Kamil's departure a large factor.

I presumed (ignorantly) that Victor would use the app as a base for the website - both were after all intended to work together. For reasons unknown, and in hindsight and what I can only put down to a deliberate attempt to derive more development days, CodeLeap:

- built the website from scratch, instead of using the app's database model
- did not provide a beta website for 8 months despite several requests
- added unwanted (& non-working) features
- ignored four requests (two in person, two by email) to focus on specific items
-did not provide a basic monthly progress plan/roadmap
- did not log requests send by email/discussed in person.

There was not even standard follow-ups to meetings (that I had requested), to confirm what was to be worked on. Whilst I initially put this down to incompetence, in hindsight I believe this was deliberate, with no transparency on the work nor what I was paying for e.g. a set of icons were designed despite me providing them upfront, an unrequested nor required 'title page', etc.

After 8 months I was finally presented with a 'beta' website - the quality was awful, with no working features, completely veered from what I had requested, and the app was rendered useless as the db model was not in sync. The end cost of the web piece was £54,700 (138 dev days). I subsequently terminated the contract, and relayed to Victor the reasons for such.

We tried to discuss a solution going forward over my dissatisfaction over the Project - during this discussion phase, whilst I acknowledge that the contract had ended, I considered the service very poor, with replies to emails coming a month or two later. Asking why the website was not compatible with the app was met with a shrug of the shoulders. I was subsequently offered partial corrective work at a '50% discount', and then for nothing after I mentioned that the best way to satisfy the disagreement was to do so in Court, as per the Contract.

However, during the latter discussion Victor blatantly lied stating that '..in our meetings I did ask whether you wanted a roadmap, but you said it was not needed.' Logically this made no sense - why would anyone not want to know where £4,000 monthly project development costs were being spent, or the Project progressing? This false statement was subsequently repeated a couple of times.

This put a completely different perspective on things, and made me question CodeLeap's integrity as well as why:

- a monthly roadmap/plan was never provided
- my requests to focus on certain areas were consistently ignored
-no follow-up notes were made to meetings
etc

...in fact, the complete opposite to how the earlier app work was performed.

Of course, the above is from my perspective only, and Victor has his side - for example he vaguely stated that my development requests were not clear (despite being stated verbally and in writing numerous times) - if they were not clear:
1. why were they not questioned
2. why were they worked on regardless, &
3. why were monthly updates not provided?

I asked CodeLeap to remove my referral from their site but they continued to place it, hence this review.

I also noted that CodeLeap's Ltd Co address is a virtual office, making it difficult (but not impossible) to submit legal documents/action.

In his reply to this review I note that Victor stated 'we approached both phases with the same care and process that had worked so well before' which unfortunately is 100% incorrect - unlike the 1st (app) phase, the 2nd (website) phase had no monthly roadmap/development plan, beta site (for constant review), meetings follow-ups, etc. In response to how it's a shame how the relationship ended, when there's no integrity or trust, that shouldn't be a surprise. To this day I have had no breakdown on how the 138 dev days were spent.

There was one silver lining - I found another Brazilian co to complete the work, who charge me £200 per day (in line with offshore development rates) that I'm very happy with.

2025年7月22日
自発的なレビュー
Codeleap ロゴ

Codeleap からの回答

Thanks, Edwin. It's a real shame this is how a multi-year working relationship ended. The earlier phase of the work went well — that's reflected in your own review — and it's genuinely disappointing that the later phase didn't, especially given we approached both phases with the same care and process that had worked so well before. We tried in good faith to work through the concerns when they arose, but weren't able to reach a resolution together. We won't debate the specifics here.

For anyone reading this while considering CodeLeap: we've been building software for founders and businesses since 2019. We take pride in how we plan, communicate, and deliver — and in how we handle things when disagreements come up. If this review gives you pause, please get in touch. We'd be happy to walk you through how we work, share references from current clients, and answer anything you'd like to know.

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します。

詳細情報