レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

These are the people who are trying to govern our legal purchases. They are testing the "waters" by bullying steam, itch and potentially others to get art/media removed from the platform they do... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Ninteen Eighty Four is a dystopian novel that portrays the censorship of media via government control. It's a terrifying book that warns the public how dangerous a hill censorship can be. Trying... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Turning innocent as a lamb people into raging mob is what this company does best and as of today, that's probably the only thing they're famous for. Limiting freedom of speech and spreading censorship... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wow, thanks for deciding what I shouldn’t be allowed to buy. I totally needed your moral compass jammed into my wallet. It’s not like I have free will or a functioning brain to make decisions for... もっず芋る

1.2

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1

91件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

1.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(91)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Collective Shout employs weak and


Collective Shout employs weak and ideologically driven arguments to push for widespread censorship of media. Rather than engaging in open dialogue or nuanced critique, they advocate for the removal of any content that doesn't align with their narrow moral framework. What they label as "harmful" or "bad" is often based on subjective and inconsistent standards, not on evidence of actual harm.

This approach risks creating a cultural environment where only content that aligns with their personal values is considered acceptable. Their efforts often involve pressuring payment processors and service providers to withdraw support from creators or platforms that host material they disapprove of. This tactic bypasses democratic debate and threatens freedom of expression, as it gives a single group disproportionate power to dictate what others can see, make, or support financially.

In effect, their goal isn't just to protect people from genuinely harmful content — it's to redefine what is acceptable based on their own ideology and to suppress anything outside of it.

2025幎7月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This organisation doesnt want you to have free speech.

This censorship opens doors to block anything any organisation. Now what they did on steam is acceptable but how they did it is not. What they did with itch.io is so much worse. The path they laid for anyone to now block violence, blood, lgbt+, historic events and anything inbetween is massive. This should not be possible and should be a violation of free speech.

2025幎7月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Collective nonsense.

Collective Nonsense.

Collective Shout deserves every negative review it gets. Just a horrible joke what they stand for and I have yet to read one good thing about them. I hope they get banned soon enough.

2025幎7月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Garbage Org, Very predatory and dystopian.

These are the people who are trying to govern our legal purchases. They are testing the "waters" by bullying steam, itch and potentially others to get art/media removed from the platform they don't own. mainly NSFW But can easily do other games like RDR2, Postal, etc.

They don't play video games yet they are trying to touch/control the market. They were alleged to support "cuties" which is pretty ironic.

They are targeting video games because they view it as an easy target.

A class action lawsuit is likely coming.

2025幎7月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Collective Shout should be sued and destroyed for their lies and actions.

No one should ever trust Collective Shout because they claim they are a grassroots group but of course THAT IS A LIE.

They are likely funded by the Australian government along with certain corporations and groups like Visa, Mastercard along with fake “advocacy” groups like NCOSE and Exodus cry where some of the members of the two groups I mentioned above were caught with pornographic material featuring minors.

They defended a movie known as Cuties which featured children in a disgusting way where real groups slammed the movie while Collective Shout defended it.

Collective Shout along with its founder need to be investigated for many potiental crimes especially those related to children because they have lied over and over about what they do and their actions as of late have pissed off the worldwide gaming community.

Instead of clarifying their actions they have literally tripled down on their lies while threatening and blocking people who don’t agree with what they are doing.

I have a message for Melinda Tankard and her buddies you will lose and you will pay a very heavy price for your lies and the world is coming after you.

Seethe and Cope you Karens because you won’t be escaping and lying very soon.

2025幎7月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Not actually helping women

Not all charities are equal. Some are activists in disguise or just exist to funnel donations to the directors of the charities. Collective shout is one of those. They’re a bunch of Karens who claim to be a pro-feminist charity but they actually do more to push people against feminism than they could possibly imagine. Pro tip for the idiots who work for them. Going on X and calling anyone who disagrees with you an Incel (You’re incorrectly using this word btw) is just going to radicalize them against you. I’d imagine their board of directors are pocketing millions whilst their Karens are trying to cancel pointless thing.

So what does this charity do? They’ve harassed a bakery over a t-shirt that had "We've got the best buns in town" written on it. They’re trying to get Fifty Shades of Grey banned. They’ve tried to get adverts featuring women in short shorts or tops that show midriff banned (they’re based in Australia, go outside and you’ll see loads of women in short shorts and tops). They’ve tried to get swimsuit calendars banned (the ones the models make loads of money off of). You can look all of this up, it's well documented. I don’t think they’ve ever actually helped a women in need or at least I can’t find any evidence of it. Everything they do is related to banning “things they don’t like” online.

Don’t give them any money, give it to a charity that actually helps women in need. You’re just making their directors rich. Give your cash to charity that houses women in need or provides aid to female causes. They’re pointlessly focusing on the digital world on subjects that just don’t matter.

2025幎7月22日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報