レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.5

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.5

すべおのレビュヌ

(5)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 5ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Dreadful they charge £500 for one pipe

Dreadful that they charge £500 for doing sod all
For not repairing the job
They replaced one pipe on my sink and it didn’t fit properly
And then said after the main sink needs swapping but they didn’t provide the new sink
£500 for what they did was really poor.
It leaks still
The pipe didn’t fit properly

2026幎6月29日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Disgraceful service from this company

Disgraceful service from this company. Plumbing emergency. Company sends a bathroom fitter without the right tools who can’t fit the problem; initially demands £600 drops it to £200 and then we have to pay - problem not resolved and no sign of money reimbursement. Continual promises for a call back from management.

2026幎6月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Avoid!

We had a leak coming from the sink trap underneath out kitchen sink so i called a company who sent the work to this company.

One engineer came and assessed the sink and then said he would ask his manager for a quote. After returning he quoted £600 (550 for the work and 50 for the call out fee). I panicked and accepted the quote, after he fixed the leak it turns out all he did was take the trap off and refit it.

Took him 10 minutes for 600 quid, Avoid at all costs

2026幎6月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Avoid, overpriced

I called as I had a leak in my hot water tank. The price quoted for the call-out was £49, a further charge of £75 for locating the leak was added. I have ended up paying £478 in total to make the leak safe and been given a further quote or £1675 to repair the tank. I felt uncomfortable as two young men arrived as I was in the house alone and obliged to pay for this initial temporary fix. I feel I have been ripped off and subsequent enquiries have shown me it would be cheaper to remove and replace the unit. I would not recommend this company or use them again.

2026幎5月29日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

BEWARE! AVOID THIS COMPANY!

**Avoid — poor workmanship, pressure to pay, and serious concerns after reading other reviews**

I contacted this company for a leak from the U-bend under my sink after being connected through Google’s recommended business feature. This turned out to be a serious mistake.

Umer attended with another person. From the outset, I had very little confidence in their experience, professionalism, or technical knowledge, so I stayed and watched the work closely.

In my opinion, no proper diagnosis or meaningful repair was carried out. The pipework was simply taken apart and put back together again, with no clear explanation of what had actually been fixed or why the charge was justified.

Despite this, I was charged £150 and felt pressured to pay immediately, with the clear impression that they were not going to leave until I did. The situation felt uncomfortable and unprofessional. Thankfully I knew I was able to refund this through Google for recommending them.

What concerns me even more is that, when I checked the company’s Google reviews afterwards, I saw a number of other reviews describing similar concerns around poor workmanship, high charges, and pressure to pay. Some of those reviews also appeared to mention vulnerable or elderly customers. I cannot personally verify those other experiences, but I found it extremely concerning, especially as those reviews no longer appear to be visible.

Based on my own experience, I would strongly advise others to be extremely cautious before allowing this company into their home, particularly anyone vulnerable, elderly, or likely to feel intimidated by pressure to pay on the spot.

I would not use this company again and would not recommend them.

2025幎5月18日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報