レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 空調システム提䟛業者
  2. ゚アコン請負業者
  3. ゚アコン修理業
  4. ゚アコン販売店
  5. 暖房噚具提䟛業者
  6. 冷暖房空調蚭備斜工請負業者

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

Daikin is the most trusted name in air conditioning with energy efficient solutions for residential and commercial applications.


連絡先

2.4

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

6件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Never a Daikin again – Extremely poor service and questionable parts

Never a Daikin again – Extremely poor service and questionable parts

1 out of 5 for both Daikin Australia and LJ Air (Would give -10 if possible)!

I purchased a Daikin Australia split system air conditioner expecting reliability and professional service. Instead, I experienced a frustrating and poorly handled repair process when the Condenser Unit’s main circuit board burned out along with two other key parts and needed replacing after only four years, despite the unit being under the manufacturer’s 5-year warranty. This meant 4 of our 6 interior units did not work at the start of and during a multi-week heatwave. This was a $15,000 investment, that was regularly service annually at an additional cost of over $2000. That’s a 66% failed investment. A $11,332 failure in less than four years I can’t “just right off” like a corporate business.

The service experience with both Daikin Australia and their contracted service provider LJ Air was extremely poor.

First, Daikin staff or their representative/General Council De Fries, never acknowledged any wrongdoing or incompetence during or at the end of the entire process. Despite clear evidence of communication failures, missing information, and delays, Daikin consistently dismissed the issues and insisted their service was “more than acceptable.”

In particular, Mr De Fries and Andrew were rude, dismissive or both, repeatedly downplaying the impact the delay had on my family during a multi-week heatwave. Rather than addressing the actual service failures, they focused on defending internal processes and explaining how busy their service centre was.

The situation was made worse by conflicting and questionable information about when parts were received and shipped. Daikin claimed the replacement parts were delivered to LJ Air within two business days, yet Luke from LJ Air told me days later they were still waiting for answers.” This raises serious concerns about whether Daikin and LJ Air were being truthful about the parts timeline.

Luke from LJ Air also failed to contact me promptly once the parts allegedly arrived, despite promising he would book the repair as soon as they were received. Instead, I had to keep chasing both companies for updates.

What is most frustrating is that neither Daikin nor LJ Air ever initiated follow-up communication. In every instance, I had to initiate contact just to find out what was happening with my warranty repair. Without repeatedly following up myself, it is entirely possible the issue would have taken weeks longer to resolve.

Basically:
1 - Major components failed within 4 years.
2 – There was poor communication and inaccurate information from both Daikin and LJ Air.
3 – I got conflicting statements about when parts were received and shipped.
4 - Broken promises from Luke at LJ Air regarding contacting me once parts arrived.
5 - Rude and dismissive responses from Daikin staff and executive representatives.
6 - No accountability was taken by Daikin or LJ Air.
7 - No proactive follow-up from either company — I had to chase every update.

Even after lodging a formal complaint with Daikin Executives, Daikin refused to acknowledge any failures and declined to take responsibility for the actions of their contracted service provider LJ Air who, to date, have ignored me and not acknowledged receipt of my complaint or provided feedback or a response.

For a premium air-conditioning brand that markets itself on quality and reliability, the customer service, communication, and accountability shown here were extremely poor.

If this experience is representative of how Daikin Australia and LJ Air handle warranty repairs, I would strongly encourage potential customers to think carefully before purchasing. Buy a Mitsubishi, LG or Panasonic but NEVER a Daikin.

2026幎2月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Faulty Product and Worse After Service

Hi my 16KW aircon unit had a faulty wolf valve which is a manufactueing issue which caused all my gas to leak and the expansion valve to fail. My compressor is now running at 25% after $2600 to fix to this point. I am looking at a further $5000 to fix. The unit is 6 years old and Daiken are sticking to the 5 year warranty, not even an offer to get a reduced rate on parts. 2 weeks of emails and calls still with no reply. Terrbile product and and even worse after service.

Off to consumer and offcie of fair trade as this is a faulty product they have sold.

Don't buy Daikin.

2025幎12月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

TWO Failed Daikin Air Condituoners

Two new air conditioners failed within a year. Appalling customer service. Manufacturer’s fault as both have gas leaks. Daikin have dragged their heels fixing them under warranty and it is 4 months now and still not fixed. Daikin will not contribute to the cost of the roof removal as both units need to be removed. A nightmare and not one that goes with a supposedly good brand and very expensive air conditioners, I would avoid Daikin products in future. Installers said gas leaks are becoming an issue!

2024幎6月2日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報