レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(1)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 1ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Avoid this company!!!!!

Avoid this company. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend them under any circumstances.

What should have been an exciting renovation became one of the most stressful and expensive experiences I have ever had. I live in the UK and relied on this company to manage my renovation in Spain professionally and honestly. Instead, I was left with poor workmanship, unauthorised changes to the agreed specification, additional costs and a complete breakdown in communication once they had been paid.

I had a detailed specification for the work, yet important decisions were made without my knowledge or approval. In a written message, the builder admitted:

"We assumed you wanted the doors if they didn't have the trim, and we also thought that leaving the tiles in good condition would save us work and time to meet the agreed date. That's why we didn't notify you."

That message speaks for itself.

I had specifically chosen a particular door trim. Instead of informing me that it could not be obtained and allowing me to make the decision, different doors were fitted without my approval. More seriously, despite my clear instructions that all existing bathroom wall tiles were to be removed before retiling, they decided to tile over two existing layers because it would "save work and time". I now have three layers of tiles on my bathroom walls and have had to arrange an independent survey to determine whether the installation is safe.

I was also told that the renovation had been completed. Relying on that information, I spent more than £400 travelling from the UK to Spain, only to discover that the property was nowhere near finished.

When I inspected the work, I found numerous defects. The shower had not been sealed correctly, allowing water to leak into the bathroom, and they had to return twice before it was finally repaired. The shower fixture had not been securely fixed to the wall and could simply be pulled away by hand. The sink cabinet had not even been fixed to the wall properly and could be moved by hand. These are basic installation issues that should never have existed.

These defects were only corrected because I refused to make the final payment until they were addressed. During this time I was threatened with legal action if I did not pay.

Before making the final payment, a formal meeting took place with an independent solicitor and the co-owner of the property. During that meeting I was assured that any remaining defects and any further issues identified after completion would be rectified. Relying on those assurances, I made the final payment in good faith.

Unfortunately, once payment had been made, further defects became apparent.

The electrical installation became one of my biggest concerns. I had to employ an independent qualified electrician at my own expense after electrical faults occurred. The electrician identified incorrectly wired electrical work that required immediate rectification. I repeatedly requested evidence that the person who carried out the electrical work was properly qualified and authorised, but those requests were ignored.

The air-conditioning installation also had to be rectified by the original air-conditioning company because of the standard in which it had been been left.

After these further issues came to light, communication stopped completely and I was blocked. The promises made before payment were no longer honoured, leaving me to arrange and pay for remedial work myself.

Throughout the project I repeatedly requested details of the materials installed, including the flooring, wall tiles, internal doors and sanitaryware. Despite numerous requests, this information was never provided.

I also requested the company's official Hoja de Reclamaciones (consumer complaint form), but it was not provided.

What I found particularly upsetting was that, while I was dealing with unresolved defects and paying other professionals to rectify the work, the company was using videos of my property on its social media pages to advertise its workmanship and promote the quality of its services.

Everything stated in this review is based on my personal experience and is supported by written communications, photographs, invoices and other documentation that I have retained.

My advice to anyone considering this company is simple: make sure every variation is agreed in writing, never assume the agreed specification will be followed without checking, verify who is carrying out specialist work, obtain all certificates and product information before making final payment, and do not release the final payment until every aspect of the work has been independently inspected and accepted.

I sincerely hope that no other homeowner has to go through the experience that I have.

2026幎7月3日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報