Harpsurveyors レビュヌ 2

•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

2.9

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

2.9

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

2件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Absolutely disgusting service from


Absolutely disgusting service from Adrian Robinson, we paid for a level 3 survey and it was completely useless, just a load of excuses in the report for why he couldn't inspect different areas even though the homeowner was present and willing to move anything that was in the way, nothing but a cowboy, I will report him to the regulators as he is just scamming people out of their money and leaving people to have to pay for another survey afterwards. Do not waste your money! This is the first page of the survey so you can see the quality of his work for yourselves: At the time of our inspection, the property was occupied and fully furnished with some floors
covered. The furniture, including fitted or heavy freestanding storage units, seriously restricted
access to the floors. We were, therefore, not able to gain access to the structural slab or to the timbers
and boards beneath the coverings. To undertake a more comprehensive inspection, including
removal of floorboards would require express permission from the vendor or owner of the property.
Should permission be forthcoming indemnity against damage during such operations would also be
required.
Stored personal effects throughout the property restricted the extent of inspection possible.
The inspection of the main roof structure was limited as it has been covered internally. As sections
of the roof structure could not be seen, such as the lower ends of the rafters and the wall plates, it
cannot be confirmed they have not been in contact with rainwater. It is not uncommon for timbers in these areas to develop decay and further inspection is recommended once the roof space has been
cleared.
Many parts of a building such as foundations and sub-floor areas are concealed during the inspection.
Also, we have not inspected woodwork or other parts of the structure that are covered, unexposed
or inaccessible, and we are, therefore unable to report that any such part of the property is free from
defect.
Due to site constraints, our inspection of some high level elements of the property was severely
limited. Consequently we are only able to comment upon those areas that are visible from vantage
points within the boundaries of the property, or adjacent public areas.
As it was not raining at the time of the inspection it is not possible to confirm that the rainwater
installation is free from blockage, leakage etc, or that it is coping with long periods of heavy rainfall.
Binoculars were used to examine roof slopes. Chimneystacks etc, externally, and a hand held damp
meter was used internally.
As far as the service installations (gas, electricity, hot and cold water, space heating and drainage)
are concerned, our inspection was a superficial and tests were not carried out. In the absence of
specific tests by appropriate professionals, we cannot give any warranty as to their condition, design
or efficiency.
The central heating system was not tested. The assessment of central heating is a specialist matter
governed by regulations set out by various bodies. We cannot guarantee that the installation fully
complies with these regulations. If you require further assurance on the heating installation we must
recommend that a specialist heating engineer be asked to inspect and report on the system. We will
be pleased to arrange this on your behalf if required.
We have not arranged for any investigations to be carried out to determine whether or not asbestos,
High Alumina cement, concrete, calcium chloride additive or other deleterious materials have been
used in the construction of this property and we are therefore unable to report that the property is
free from risk in this respect

2024幎4月12日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報