レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報


連絡先

2.9

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

2件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

この䌁業を閲芧した人は、以䞋の䌁業も閲芧しおいたす。

2.9

すべおのレビュヌ

(2)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 2ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely poor!

This restaurant is ridiculously overpriced for low quality food!. I was in a party of four and we ordered different dishes that were all supposed to be served with a different jus, and they were all the same,basically made of gravy granules! When we said this to the waitress, the owner came over and was unbelievably confrontational, no apologies, as if we had no right to complain at all. Needless to say, none of us would ever return and will tell others of our bad experience!

2026幎6月6日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

An extortionate disappointment!!!

I rarely leave negative reviews, but our experience at Harry's Bistro was sufficiently disappointing that I feel compelled to provide an honest account.

To begin with the positives, the restaurant enjoys an attractive location on the golf course, with pleasant views. The waiting staff were friendly and courteous throughout our visit. However, they appeared to have only a limited knowledge of the menu and were unable to answer even basic questions about the dishes being served.

Unfortunately, almost every other aspect of the experience fell well below the standard implied by the restaurant's pricing and reputation.

For a restaurant charging premium prices, the overall presentation is remarkably underwhelming. The dining room feels dated, the tables and chairs are tired, the cutlery and glassware are unremarkable, and the laminated menu does little to create the impression of a serious dining establishment. While décor alone does not determine quality, first impressions matter, particularly when customers are being asked to pay fine-dining prices.

The food was the greatest disappointment of all.

The starters were expensive for what was, at best, average cooking. However, it was the main courses that exposed the restaurant's limitations most clearly. Between our party we ordered duck, pork and faggots. Despite being entirely different dishes, each arrived submerged beneath the same dark sauce, described rather ambitiously on the menu as a "jus". It bore none of the characteristics of a properly prepared jus. Instead, it tasted very much like a basic stock combined with gravy granules to produce a thick, heavy sauce that was then applied indiscriminately to every plate. The result was predictable: the sauce overwhelmed everything it touched, eliminating any individuality the dishes may once have possessed.

What concerned me most was the lack of refinement. The cooking felt dated, unimaginative and lacking in technical precision. At these prices, customers are entitled to expect attention to detail, balance of flavour and a degree of culinary ambition. We encountered none of those things.

I travel extensively and dine regularly at highly regarded restaurants throughout the UK. The gap between the prices being charged and the quality being delivered is simply too great to ignore. The food is not of a standard that justifies either its reputation or its pricing.

The impression I was left with is of a restaurant that has become insulated from meaningful criticism. It appears to benefit from a loyal local following and a strong reputation within the immediate area, but neither of those things can substitute for objective quality. A restaurant should be judged by what arrives on the plate, not by the affection of its regular customers.

The most disappointing aspect of the evening came when I raised our concerns with the female owner. Rather than engage constructively with feedback, she responded with a level of defensiveness and hostility that I found quite remarkable. There was no genuine interest in understanding our experience or considering our criticisms. Instead, the conversation quickly became dismissive and confrontational.

Every restaurant receives criticism from time to time. What distinguishes good operators from poor ones is how they respond to it. In this instance, the attitude displayed only reinforced the concerns we already had about the food and the overall experience.

Ultimately, Harry's Bistro charges prices that place it firmly in competition with genuinely excellent restaurants. Unfortunately, the food, service standards and professionalism fall far short of that level.

There are numerous pubs and restaurants in Beaumaris offering better food, better value and a more welcoming experience. Based on our visit, I cannot recommend Harry's Bistro and would not return.

2026幎6月6日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報