レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 䞍動産管理䌚瀟
  2. アパヌト賃貞業
  3. 䞍動産業
  4. 䞍動産業者
  5. 䞍動産賃貞゚ヌゞェンシヌ

圓該䌁業による蚘述

An independent residential letting agency and property management. Includes list of properties, testimonials and contact details.


連絡先

3.9

ほが満足

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌの 100に回答しおいたす

通垞1カ月以䞊経っおから回答

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Locked out but fixed within a few hours!

Our lock on our front door broke from the inside. Our letting agent came out on a Sunday evening and had a locksmith fix it within a few hours. A new lock fitted the very next day. So grateful for the fast service!

2026幎4月20日
Karsons Lettings ロゎ

Karsons Lettings からの回答

Thank you for your kind review Annie-Rose. We’re really pleased we could help get the problem resolved quickly and make the property secure again. It means a lot to know you were happy with the service.

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Bhavesh was extremely helpful when our


Bhavesh was extremely helpful when our front door lock broke and we couldn’t enter on a Sunday evening. He came himself and got a locksmith to help us very quickly! Super chuffed

2026幎4月20日
Karsons Lettings ロゎ

Karsons Lettings からの回答

Thank you so much for your kind review Callum. I’m really pleased we were able to get the issue sorted quickly and help you get back into the property!

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Unprofessional , Incompetent, Untrustworthy

In just a few months, I was forced to terminate the services of Karsons Lettings due to problematic behaviours and multiple breaches of their management responsibilities, all of which I have evidence for. These included:

1. Conducting unauthorised works on my flat.
2. Making highly inappropriate mysogynistic remarks, which I raised via email but received no response.
3. Failing to complete tasks in a timely manner, which happened alot. Again, this was raised via multiple emails.
4. Ignoring my clear written instructions.
5. Charging me for works I had no knowledge of.
6. Attempting to access the property without permission, which the tenants reported. Something I had to speak to the police about, as he kept arguing he was in the right. (I have those emails too).
7. And finally, the last straw, disclosing confidential information to third parties, which breached even the standards set by The Property Ombudsman.

After termination, out of £1,000 rental income, only £95 was returned to me. While I had no issue with legitimate management fees being deducted, almost £800 remained in dispute. When I asked him about this, he wouldn't return my money. So, I pursued the matter through court mediation (which he also breached and would not respond to emails), the matter then had to go back to court, and start afresh. So far, I have only received £228 in refund for the unauthorised works conducted. The remaining £300+ VAT has not been returned despite multiple written requests. He's gone awol again. Happens alot.

This matter has been escalated further and is still being investigated. Also the conduct of Karsons Lettings will be reported to the MP. Taking a so called 'early termination fee' of almost £400, when he repeatedly breached his contractual obligations and code of ethics set by every regulatory body you can think of is a big problem. Beware!

Latest Update

After ignoring around 15 emails over the course of a year about returning my money, it’s telling that the only time he responded was after I left a review. That alone reflects the level of professionalism here.

When I escalated this to the Property Ombudsman, I was extremely concerned to discover that he submitted an old mediation document that he’d breached and was rescinded (basically no longer legally valid), and presented it as if it were a current, binding agreement that I'd agreed to honour. This was a serious and deliberate misrepresentation.

Btw, the fact that he did breach that mediation agreement by ignoring multiple follow-ups and the date set by the courts, forced me to return to court and start the whole process from scratch. The judge acknowledged the breach and allowed the case to proceed, while suggesting we try to resolve it outside of court. I made that effort, but his conduct was so outrageous. From jumping up all the time. Standing over me, Stating he would leave every 10mins or so, gritting teeth and snarling everytime a question was asked. ALL VERY weird. The things people will do to keep your money is incredible.

Anyhow, TPO reviewed the evidence, especially when I presented legal proof that there was no agreement for me to settle for half a refund, and that I was stilled owed well over £350. They also informed me that his behaviour was unethical, but advised that court would the appropriate route, as they cannot enforce repayment if the other party is unwilling.

I've been advised I have a strong case, especially as I have proof that he’s been sending across rescinded documents and I’m considering legal action again. In the meantime, I’ll continue sharing my experience everywhere so others are aware!

2025幎2月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
Karsons Lettings ロゎ

Karsons Lettings からの回答

Thank you for your feedback, Ngozi.

We are sorry that you feel this way, but we do not agree with the version of events set out in your review and we strongly dispute a number of the allegations made.

This matter has already been dealt with through formal correspondence and court mediation. During that process, a refund was agreed and paid in relation to the specific item raised. The remaining deductions related to charges that we consider were properly due under the management agreement.

Given that this involves private client, tenant and property information, it would not be appropriate for us to respond in detail on a public review platform. We also do not believe it would be fair or professional to disclose the full background of the dispute publicly.

We take complaints seriously and always aim to act professionally, fairly and in accordance with our management terms. Where a dispute remains, we believe it should be dealt with through the appropriate formal channels rather than through public reviews.

Karsons Lettings

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報