レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

3.2

たあたあ

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の3

3件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

3.2

すべおのレビュヌ

(3)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 3ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Kenneth Jones Solicitors quoted me a price and then reneigned at the appointment by substantially increasing the price.

Kenneth Jones Solicitors quoted me a price of £20.00 to certify two documents (£10.00 each document) required for the Land Registry which was made clear to them over the phone. However at the appointment at their Tettenhall office i was told the price had increased to £150.00 for the two documents. Needless to say I did not accept the increase and left feeling very angry and disappointed that my time had been wasted and they had not honoured their committment to the price quoted to me. I will never deal with these solicitors again and would advise anyone thinking of doing so to reconsider.

2025幎9月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

A Solicitor Who Should Be Held Accountable for all teh mistakes made

If I Could Give Them minus 5 Stars, That Would Be me being very Kind — A Solicitor Who Should Be Held Accountable for many mistakes made with regard to conveyancing.

This review refers specifically to the Wolverhampton office.

In my personal experience, the solicitor acting for our buyer played a central role in the collapse of our house sale — just days before completion, after five long and emotionally draining months.

Early in the process, they raised a vague concern about a “break in the wall” in my utility room — something I still don’t understand and was never explained or evidenced. From there, the misinformation only escalated.

Most damaging of all, the solicitor gave false and misleading advice to the buyer’s lender, claiming there was a mine shaft within 20 meters of our property and according to my buyer they told him it was in my front garden and that it had caused structural movement in the property. They stated this information came from a coal mining report.

However, when I challenged this with the official coal mining report I obtained when I purchased the property, which showed no mine shaft in the garden or anywhere in the local area, the solicitor retracted the statement and admitted it had been a mistake. By then, the damage was done. The lender withdrew, the buyer pulled out, and our sale collapsed — despite the fact that the buyer had been fully aware of the historic movement and the professional repairs before making their offer.

Although our property did experience minor natural land movement in 2019, it’s important to note that the house was built in 1896 — a solid period property constructed with a traditional cellar rather than modern foundations. In fact, its longevity and resilience, having stood firm through two world wars, is a testament to its structural integrity. The movement was not in any way caused by a mine shaft, as there are none in the surrounding area.

The issue was professionally addressed by our reputable insurance company, with long-term guarantees in place. Furthermore, three other houses on our road have sold recently without any complications, which only reinforces that the solicitor’s claims were entirely unfounded.

As a direct result of their actions, we also lost our onward purchase, which was immediately put back on the market. That was utterly devastating. We had packed, prepared, and were days away from starting a new chapter — only to have it ripped away through no fault of our own. What made it worse was that we never received any apology or acknowledgment from the solicitor involved.

This review reflects my honest opinion and personal experience. In my view, the solicitor’s handling of the transaction was negligent, unprofessional, and deeply damaging.

If you’re considering using this firm, I would urge caution. Based on what we went through, I would not trust them with something as important as a home sale.

2025幎8月28日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報