Kirkham Pryer レビュヌ 

18
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

4.3

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 公認枬量士
  2. 建築コンサルタント
  3. 土地家屋調査士
  4. 枬量技垫

圓該䌁業による蚘述

Kirkham Pryer are a firm of Chartered Building Surveyors based in Cheltenham, serving Gloucestershire and the Cotswolds. We provide RICS Level 3 and Level 2 pre-purchase Home surveys, defect inspections and reports, refurbishment and extension project management and design services


連絡先

4.3

優良

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の4.5

18件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

4.3

すべおのレビュヌ

(18)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 0ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Enquired about a level 3 survey for an


Enquired about a level 3 survey for an apartment purchase. Bob replied quickly with a quote and made arrangements to visit the property. Bob kept me updated and sent across the detailed survey report within a week of the visit and was very helpful over the phone explaining it. Great job, clear communication and very happy with the experience, thank you

2025幎3月6日
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Bob Hill is brilliant!

Bob Hill has just completed a Level 3 survey on a 175 year old house in Cheltenham (which needs a LOT of restoration) and I could not have been happier with his work.

Firstly his price included a complete package, compared to that of his competitors - who add drone footage, repair costs and a rebuild valuation as extra. And Kirkham Pryers price was still the most competitive.

I received a thorough (103 page) report within 1 week and Bob made himself available for a call to discuss all aspects of his findings. He was helpful and patient (considering my lack of experience) and extremely knowledgeable.

I would not hesitate in recommending Bob Hill at Kirkham Pryers to any future restoration house buyers.

2025幎1月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Happy with the overall service and would use again if/when required

I dealt with Bob Hill at Kirkham Pryer and found him to be very professional and happy to explain certain elements regarding the survey.

He was helpful in indicating which materials would be required for the task, and although it was snowing on the day of his visit, he didnt complain.

Happy with the overall service and would use again if/when required

2024幎11月12日
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Value for money, excellent service

Kirkham Pryer carried out a full survey of a Grade II listed house we were buying. We had no idea what to expect but the clarity of detail and ease of reading of the comprehensive report gave us the confidence we needed to proceed with the purchase. The report also gave us valuable recommendations and advice which we will consider going forward. We felt the survey was value for money and would definitely recommend Kirkham Pryer

2022幎8月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

Highly Recommended!

We used Kirkham Pryer as both surveyors of our apartment building roof and subsequently in a consultative capacity. In both they were exemplary; the report on their findings were comprehensive with the follow-up help and guidance invaluable. The professionalism experienced compels me to highly recommend this company

2022幎9月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Disgraceful

This company does not warrant one star. John Bevan made errors in his measurements which prevented us taking our complaint about our windows to court.He then refused to talk to the wi dow company and also wrote at length about a window we had already been refunded for. When I complained he offered me a full refund and then "forgot"to send the cheque. When I asked about it he said he had now decided not to refund me as I had "demanded the refund"!
I complained to the company who again promised to pay and sent me a cheque which bounced . I was promised it would be resent and a week later another one arrived which again bounced and I still havent been refunded. Avoid at all costs.Inept and totally unprofessional is an understatement.

2022幎7月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Would never let this surveyor in my


Would never let this surveyor in my house nor would I use Kirkham Pryors services. John Bevan made suggestions that our perfect Victorian sash windows should be replaced, that the house was ‘poorly presented’ (how is even a relevant remark?) given we had 11 offers I don’t think it can have been that bad! He called the extension work ‘shoddy’ (we used Harry Antonious who is a top end builder) and worst of all cost us our house sale by suggesting our house had current movement despite the further investigations of a structural engineer who said that the movement was very historical and was just settlement. John refused to talk to the engineer (why?) and also shared information about a neighbouring property’s issues (which he also got wrong) and in addition shared private information about said house. Unprofessional doesn’t cover it.

2022幎6月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
Kirkham Pryer ロゎ

Kirkham Pryer からの回答

This is not a client of Kirkham Pryer Limited and should not be able to provide a review on this platform

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

John Bevan from Kirkham Pryer recently


John Bevan from Kirkham Pryer recently surveyed our house.

When John turned up he was rather flustered, and found the layout of the house surprisingly confusing.

The survey report contained a number of surprising factual errors. For example, in our grade II listed house he considered the front windows to have "a rather poor appearance" because they have a single pane. He recommended the whole windows be replaced.

But the front sash windows are original from the 1840s. There is nothing to suggest the panes are not original too, but if they were changed at some point, it was well over 100 years ago (John was also out on the date of the house by half a century) and well before the house was listed. The panes are beautiful old glass in a set of intact, original sash windows; apart from anything else, replacing them would be a contravention of the grade II listing.

How does a surveyor not know such things!

John Bevan also took it upon himself to poke holes in our walls with a screwdriver. Not just one hole but two in a single location.

In summary: John seemed poorly prepared and lacking in expertise which he compensated for by making 'professional' recommendations which were too frequently just (surprisingly) wrong.

If I buy or sell a house in the future I will not accept Kirkham Pryer as the surveyors.

2021幎1月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
Kirkham Pryer ロゎ

Kirkham Pryer からの回答

This is not a client of Kirkham Pryer Limited and should not be able to provide a review on this platform

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

absolutely shocking.

We recently had a visit from a Mr Bevan of Kirkham Pryer Chartered Surveyors, on behalf of the buyers of our property. Whilst the introduction was reasonably pleasant, this is the only positive I am able to take from our experience. Throughout his visit Mr Bevan was totally dismissive of the paperwork that we provided in order to refute his concerns, which included evidence of planning permission, drainage certificates and even building regs. He offered a lot of unnecessary personal opinion on the property and ultimately, his final report which seemed to have include his concerns, DESPITE US HAVING VALID DOCUMENTATION TO QUASH THE ISSUES, cost us the sale of our property. When I called KP to enquire about the survey, Mr Bevan stated that “oh I don’t look through the paperwork” and what we had “looked iffy” (they were the original docs from the 70s!) and promptly hung up on me. I will be taking this further and contacting the relevant ombudsman services to escalate my complaint.

2018幎7月28日
自発的なレビュヌ
Kirkham Pryer ロゎ

Kirkham Pryer からの回答

This is not a client of Kirkham Pryer Limited and should not be able to provide a review on this platform

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報