Legal Ombudsman レビュヌ 

397
•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1

1.1

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

They don’t care, don’t listen, not bothered! I’m still fighting my insurance company despite the third party insurance saying the excepted full responsibility for the accident. I’ve been to... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

No complaints against solicitors illegal & unecessary unwated actions. None resolved. 10 yrs ago cont'd ovr 2yrs all working from home most very abrupt, undermining, discriminate all left outstanding.... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Bulllied and harrased by a partner at a law firm and the legal ombudsman couldn't care less. they are happy for abuse of power and private citizens to be harrassed and manipulated by lawyers with exte... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

What a total disgrace. A firm inflated my abortive bill by 300% after I made a complaint to them. The Ombudsman decided that the inflation was justified because they continued to work on my case after... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

We are a free service with the power to resolve service complaints between consumers and lawyers, barristers and claims management companies (CMCs).


連絡先

1.1

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1

397件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

最近のレビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録はありたせん

この䌁業は最近、顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

1.1

すべおのレビュヌ

(397)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 57ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く
Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Totally corrupt and incredibly


Totally corrupt and incredibly inefficient .

1) Made a very basic mistake which skewed their entire assessment. The mistake is primary school level incompetence.

2) They then basically threaten you with enormous costs should you choose to take it to a judicial review.

3) The whole system is corrupt the solicitors involved are laughing at me on their way to the bank with my money and I cannot do a thing about it.

3) Local MP office unwilling as such to get involved.

2025幎1月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Don't expect any form of justice

Don't expect any form of justice, no matter how much evidence you have, most cases get thrown out without ANY investigation. The initial "investigator" knows that the Ombudsman won't take it further so should say so at the start, they are so arrogant, it's just a game. Any small offer will be deemed as fair from the law firm and the Ombudsman uses the 5.7 clause to dismiss the case without looking at it because of this. They have a lot of complaints and it's no wonder when nothing is done to rectify the law firms shocking behaviour, in particular dishonesty. The law firms know this to. The whole system is broken and it's the same with every other regulatory body as well right now. There is no appeal, judicial review is the only way forward. They even limit and control complaints on their own service, it's a total racket and makes a mockery of any form of justice.

2025幎1月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Leagal Trashman

After waiting more than 8 months for an investigation into incompetence with our ex solicitors.
No help whatsoever despite strong evidence charges were not investigated or explored, not even progressed to the actual ombudsman.
This is one government agency that needs closure and remove financial support from the taxpayer!!!

2025幎1月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

AS A VULNERABLE CUSTOMER CHAMPION AT THE LEGAL OMBUDSMAN I AM ADDING TO REVIEWS OF ALL THESE GOVERNMENT SCAMS AS A SURVIVOR OF THE WORST CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND CORRUPTION

AS A VULNERABLE CUSTOMER CHAMPION (FOR A SECOND TIME!!!) THE LAST TIME THEY TRIED AND FAILED TO GET ME COMPENSATION FROM CRAMP AND MULHANEY WHEN A SOLICITOR SAID I SHOULD PLEAD GULITY TO POLICE ASSAULT ON ME WHICH CONFUSED HER AS IT WAS A WELFARE CHECK ON BEACHY HEAD!!!...I HAD BEEN PUT THROUGH ENDLESS HOMELESS TORTURE OVER 8 YEARS TO DATE WHICH IS TOO MUCH TO GO INTO.) I AM GETTING THROUGH ALL THESE GOVERMENT OMBUDMSAN SCAM REVIEWS. DAN SAXBY FROM CORRUPT BRIGHTON HOUSING TRUST HAD TOLD ME TO GO THE LOCAL GOVERNEMNT AND SOCIAL CARE OMBUDSMAN FOR COMPENSATION AS THEY KEEP ARRESTING HOMELESS PEOPLE...THAT WAS A SICKENINGLY EXHAUSTING PROCESS JUST LIKE THIS ONE; I HAVE NOW BEEN THROUGH THE LEGAL OMBUDSMAN PROCESS AGAIN AS A VULNERABLE CUSTOMER CHAMPION OF ENDLESS EMAILS AND PHONECALLS AND MONTHS FOR NOTHING BUT LIES AND COVER- UPS OF THE MOST HENOUS CRIMES AND FAILINGS (THAT IS THAT THE LAW FIRMS DO NOT MIND A BIT OF POLICE BRUTALITY, INJURY AND HANDCUFFING ON A DISBALED ADULT HERE AND THERE.) I AM CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF PUTTING A LANDLADY IN PRISON AFTER BEING BEATEN OUT OF MY HOME AND THREAT OF BECOMING A POLITCIAL PRISONER FOR REFUSING TO CALL MY TRANSGENDER SISTER A MAN; I AM TAKING THIS TO THE STREETS TO SPEAK OUT AND HUMAN RIGHTS ALLEGANCE. I HAVE A SURVIVOR'S STORY; TO STICK TO THE POINT OF THE RECENT LEGAL OMBUDMSAN INVESTIGATION, AFTER MONTHS OF INVESTIGATING WHY LAWSTOP ALLOWED MY EMERGENCY ACCOMMODATION TO BE TAKEN WITH A THREAT OF POLICE FOR REFUSING TO TAKE A DERELICT FLAT; AFTER A SOCIAL WORKER SAID IF THE FLAT WAS UNSUITABLE, SHE WOULD FIND ME SOMWEHERE ELSE, SHE LEFT HER JOB AND THE PARALEGAL AND HER MANAGERESS AT LAWSTOP ALLOWED MY ONLY ROOF TO BE TAKEN FROM ME AS A DISABLED ADULT. EVEN BRIGHTON HOSPITAL COMPLAINED. IT WAS DISGUSTING AND PREMIER INN ABUSED ME AND PACKED UP MY SUITCASES WHILST I WAS IN HOSPITAL AFER SELF FUNDING FOR A MONTH THERE. MONTHS AND MONTHS OF SEFLF FUNDING HOTELS AND SNET ALL THE WAY INTO THE COUNTRYSIDE ONLY FOR THE COUNCIL TO FUND JUST ONE NIGHT IN A TRAVEL LODGE WHILST I, ALONG WITH MY PARTNER WHO NEGLECTED SPENT THOUSANDS OF POUNDS OVER 8 YEARS INCLUDING BACK PIP. LAWSTOP, THE COUNCIL AND THE LEGAL OMBUDMSAN INVESTIGATOR SENT EMAILS COVERING THEIR BACKS WITH DISGURTING LIES AS PER USUAL, NO ACCOUNTABILITY. THE UK AND IT'S GOVERNMENT IS FINISHES AND FAILING US THE PEOPLE. I was threatened out of my emergency accommodation with Police in Newhaven in November 2023 but the Legal Ombudsman Investigator finished 'investigating' (lying and fobbing off) a few months ago. I used Lawstop in April 2023 after I was beaten out of my brand new 'supported' flat by Police homeless in March 2023 after distress at my Father's death, after the Local MP caused me to be assaulted after instructing me to go the council AFTER saying he would help me AFTER ignoring my online application in March 2022 after 9 months of self funding the Cavendish Hotel AFTER EASTBOURNE BOROUGH COUNCIL PROTECTED DANGEROUS CRIMINALS WHO ATTACKED ME IN COUNCIL ACCOMMODATION e.t.c e.t.c e.t.c....there is too much to say!!!! it is endless.

2024幎1月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Solicitor admits in writing to failing


Solicitor admits in writing to failing to review our written documentation when agreeing to to do so.
Failed to insert the mandatory statement of truth as per CPR rules
Judge naturally rejects the submission.

We're charged twice to resubmit the SAME docs due to the Ashley Taylor Legal Limited failure which they admit writing. They've apologised yet refused to compensate ? Why?
Yet the Ombudsman says no errors were made ie no compensation is due !!!

2025幎1月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Absolute joke in my opinion.

Absolute joke in my opinion.

Take 2 years to even look at a complaint and then will not investigate most of the complaint because they give all of the benefit of doubt to the solicitor without investigating. They appear to have no interest whatsoever in looking at the facts or understanding the actual complaint their priority appears to be simply to find the quickest or easiest way to dismiss a complaint on the basis that its outside their scope. No sign that they want to investigate wrongdoing or serious failures in service. They appear to just want to get rid of the complaint without investigation

2024幎12月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Same folk operating the criminal


Same folk operating the criminal organisation Solicitor Regulation Authority. Criminal solicitors protecting each other's interests.
Didn't bother even looking at my complaint - told me they were inundated with complaints.
Tick,tock,tick,tock,tick,tock.
TIME'S UP FOR YOU ALL.

2024幎12月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Injustice they do not investigate they dismiss !

They do not gather evidence from the solicitors sadly and when you challenge them they dismiss you. They are based on their own opinions rather than facts and evidence. They sadly are solicitor biased and wont even ask them for evidence even if it is a solicitor rule which solicitors must follow, They actually dont care at all which very scary for the public as you wont get justice as they do not investigate! It is sadly corrupt!

2024幎11月29日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Transparency? Honesty? Forget it. Justice? No. Aggressive, biased, dangerous and harmful

Interesting to see that other people have also found the LEO have aggressively pursued them or blocked them for simply criticising them on twitter. They're just another corrupt layer of a corrupt legal system.

Shockingly, utterly, disgustingly bad - they don't follow their own guidance, the level of bias against complainants is off the scale, and beware because if you challenge them they will pursue you by any means with threats, dealing with the LEO has left me suicidal. They piled harm upon harm.

2024幎11月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

A total waste of time. This is not what anybody would call an ombudsman.man.

I had a barrister through Clerksroom who just did nothing, called none of my witnesses, did not cross examine any of my opponents witnesses and just ran off with £7,000, most of my last few savings.
My case involved fraudulent signing of documents by a solicitor.
I had been running the action as LIP for 5 years but wanted a skilled professional for the 2 day trial (which actually lasted for 2 hours).
I wrote to the barrister who arrogantly replied that his role was only as a mediator and he had acted 'in my best interests'.
I am over 100 years of age.
Seems my best interests involved my life savings of over £200.000 and my house and land valued at £600,000 + ending up who knows.
Clerksroom didn't want to know and sent me to this lot who are just there to kill off any complaints, methods are detailed by other contributors. It is actually a very cruel system as it gives long drawn out and painful hope of a resolution where none exists.

2024幎11月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Waste of time and energy

Dealing with this so-called 'regulatory body' was an absolute waste of time and energy. Despite presenting detailed, irrefutable evidence that clearly highlighted the negligence and fault of the legal firm in question, the Ombudsman chose to dismiss the case.

It took about three explanations to get the person investigating to even understand the issue. Then, instead of taking meaningful action, they chose the easy route—turning a blind eye to obvious wrongdoing.

It seems they're more invested in sitting back and doing nothing than in upholding justice for ordinary people.

2024幎3月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

discriminative and nil mgt How can a government put in place such 


We went Meaby and co Dorking dec 2020
desperate took 5 Rogue traders cases one effected the electrics and every room in our home so were in danger and the stress was immense
we chased our cases they mixed letters ,evidence they sent letters to wrong adress wrong expert ,never got libilty insurance rogues liquidated their companies before these had done a stroke of work of cases in nearly a year so we had to lodge one case they charged for !!
we were taken to court after we won due to wrong letter to claim.
But charged £30 k !!!
when we challenged them they terminated our contract to cover up
PR admitted the bill was wrong we have this recorded for our records

They then played games weeks and months and two 1/2 years later with myself and the ombudsman results shocking
my cptsd has been so poor with stress loss of my life had to endure major surgery and this as well

How can a government put in place such unequal unlawfull unprofessional not fit for purpose appauling
service

no wonder the solicitor s are having a absolute laugh at us all as the public and court system
SRA had 2 referels and nothing

seems i got told we do not have to follow equality law reasonable adjustments
we don’t have to treat you equal to a non disabled person
non following of clients best intrest charge what you like get client to chase on case great way to raise costs fraud !!
you live in danger you change cases 4 times to hide how serious this case is
yet 50 files they expected myself cptsd and disabled to be able to represent myself
they refused to look at files resused recording s refused face to face due my disability
we do not follow sra principals
no you can’t speak to why mgt so we can hide it all
we do not allow reasonable adjustments we can do what we like basically block you
Explain 22 july logged priorty and my disability yet then 


please explain how legal ombudsman have changed case officers 4 times to cover up i believe. This in it’s self it’s discrimination and appalling safeguarding.
no mgt !!!!!
So anyone please reading this please contact as talking to loads i have recorded and documented case officer s
lies and i will be looking at anyone with sharing stories my mp Alistair knew as well labour mp yet seems no action happened
so 5 cases all handled so badly
lost thousands and one case the rogue took us to court due to bad work
30 k. solicitor gets paid wow
we get £750 lol what s corupt country we live in any journalists will be talking to
yet recording the firm apologies to us but still want 30 k
i can’t fight to show the true picture as it seems fraud and corruption is it is
we live i. hope but we know they will not get a hard time like us as the clients
legal insurance Arc monthly reports these were not carried out 

. Aviva investors money

2024幎11月8日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Corrupt and cannot take criticism

The twitter account of the Legal Ombudsman blocked me after I criticised them. This even demonstrates what kind of an organisation this is.

Yet the LeO still claims that they are transparent.
Please go to their twitter account and criticise them there. I want to see how much time they are willing to dedicate to silence criticism against them, while trying to back up solicitors.

2024幎5月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The Legal Obudsman supports fraud


The Legal Obudsman recommended I take my Conveyancer to Court as they were not able to carry out the duty entrusted to them. The Legal Ombudsman Should pay all court fees and Barristers fees on my behalf and claim ti back from my Conveyancer. Instead they side step the issue and create distrust in the legal system that will eventually create Civil War as the Rule of Law is not respected or adherred to by the Legal Profession FRAUD on anational scale, have just received advise to make a judicial review against these supporters of legalised fraud the whole UK Justice system needs a judicial review by a non free Mason judge

2024幎10月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Terrible service and waste of time

Terrible service and waste of time. This is minus one. and effort. I should have read their review before taking a case against Carpenters group to them. They failed to address my presentation and either ignored my evidence or failed to review it properly. This was evidenced in their conclusion. I had to refer them them to it but they stuck to their conclusion. They are clearly out to protect and support the firm.

2024幎10月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

CORRUPT TO THE CORE!

Do not even bother bringing your complaint to these pathetic and useless frauds, THEY ARE ENABLERS OF INJUSTICE AND MISCONDUCT. The Legal Ombudsman as is the case with the bar Standards Board, are the very same people you're complaining about.

CORRUPT TO THE CORE!

2024幎10月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

They are more focused on the case failing.

To anyone reading this please think twice about bringing your case to them. I really don't say this to put anyone off, but just to say this might cause you unnecessary stress.
You will wait for weeks and when they eventually get to your case (as in mine) they may point out and look at all their reasons not to investigate.

I recognise in my case that my complaint was out of date for them to look at, but the next point that was peculiar, is that the Legal Ombudsman considers that the unprofessional way I was written to by a the Firm in my case is acceptable and "They did nothing wrong".
They didn't even look at both of my letters in the first instance and had already decided the firm did nothing wrong so I mean there's that.

They are more focused on making a case fail than to investigate. In my case they sided with the Firm without saying they sided with the Firm without an investigation stage.

So as stated I did not get to the investigation stage but I now believe those that do manage to get their case over that hurdle face an impossible task.
We all need better than this.

2024幎9月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Utter farce

Utter farce. If you believe, as I did, that this organisation is independent of the legal profession, unbiased and in place to ensure the consumer receives a fair service, forget it! They literally have no idea, and as such should be disbanded.

2024幎9月13日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報