レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報

  1. 法埋サヌビス
  2. 法埋事務所
  3. 法埋家

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

We provide legal services to commercial businesses and individuals all over England and Wales


連絡先

2.4

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

8件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

レビュヌ䟝頌の蚘録がありたせん

この䌁業は顧客にレビュヌを䟝頌しおいないため、レビュヌが党䜓の意芋を反映しおいない可胜性がありたす。

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

2.4

すべおのレビュヌ

(8)

過去12か月のレビュヌ数: 1ä»¶

レビュヌを曞く

レビュヌの確認を行いたす

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

VERY UNPROFESSIONAL FIRM

I contacted Mounteney Solicitors to deal with a land transfer, we exchanged a few Emails with details of the sale. I then phoned on 4 consecutive days to speak to the person who was dealing with transfer,
HE COULDN'T BE BOTHERED TO RETURN MY CALLS !
Very unprofessional, i would not recomend

2026幎1月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

CHEADLE BRANCH- fabulous!

After selling a couple of houses in the past and having a terrible experience with other solicitors/conveyancers, this company was a real breath of fresh air! Katie Reade looked after me and was truly fabulous. So quick and efficient, like a well-oiled machine, she was up and running as soon as my case was handed to her, and I never had to chase anything as she was always one step ahead. I have to say, it was a completely stress-free process as she took care of everything. Thank you so much Katie!

2023幎12月20日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Wasted Our Time

Terrible experience with this firm. Rang up and explained that we were changing our names on the Land Registry after getting married and filling in an AP1, and needed a solicitor to sign and say we had changed our names. Two separate receptionists confirmed this would be £10.

Turned up at the solicitor's branch and showed the solicitor our forms, he again confirmed this would be £10. He required quite a lot of time and assistance to fill in the forms - for example having to leave the room to go and get his SRA number, needing to read the firm's address off the back of a stamp, and us having to point out what bits required signing. It was quite obvious he was new (which he confirmed) so we were happy to be patient and he did complete the forms. We confirmed he didn't need anything else, paid in cash, and left.

We were almost home when a trainee solicitor from the branch rang to say that what we had got the solicitor to do was £120 worth of work and not £10. The tone was very accusatory and we felt she was insinuating that we had done this deliberately, as though we were some kind of scam artists. She was clearly very frustrated and said that our forms were now void as they would tell Land Registry that they weren't authorised. We were told if we wanted the forms to be valid we would have to come back and pay an extra £110.

The firm did not seem to have much care for the fact that this was their error, and that we shouldn't have been able to 'scam' their qualified solicitor by getting him to do more work than what they had quoted us for. On a later phone call the trainee solicitor did say sorry and acknowledged that perhaps they shouldn't have left their newest solicitor to do that job alone, and that they had been concerned about how long the work was taking but didn't intervene. They have agreed to pay the £10 back if we return the forms to them (I think they're panicking that they can't actually tell Land Registry our forms aren't valid because they have no formal record of the work they did or our full details) but it doesn't make up for the fact that we wasted our morning, a 30 mile round trip, two passport photos, printouts of the paperwork, and still don't have our forms done.

What upset us most was the inference that we tried to mislead them, when they gave us a solicitor who needed more help/training and did the work wrong. In all honesty I expected them to acknowledge their error and let us keep the forms. Quite laughable that they thought we would return and give them an extra £110 after they were rude to us and messed up the work. I think they were most worried that we had forms which they shouldn't have let us walk out with and anxious to get them back.

Wouldn't trust them again and have now taken our services elsewhere.

2023幎6月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Sat on my case for two weeks without


Sat on my case for two weeks without letting me know that the other party had signed documents and that everything was now ready for me to consider options. Thanks to their delay, the buyers and estate agents were both annoyed with me, blaming delays on me when the problem was this company not doing what i contracted them to do.

2021幎9月7日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

PLEASE READ IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING


PLEASE READ IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING USING THIS FIRM.

My review will be honest and will cover the good and the bad points, unfortunately the bad points far outweigh the goods, hence the 1 star. You can also see that I rarely leave bad reviews, I always give companies a chance to rectify problems and will praise good service, so the fact that I have had to leave this to warn other people shows just how bad the experience has been.

I needed a solicitor to assist with the purchase of my freehold, and after obtaining several quotes from various solicitors I decided to proceed with Mounteney. Another firm had warned me about other solicitors having hidden costs, but I put this down to a marketing ploy, unfortunately they were right, but more on this later. Obtaining the quote was quick and easy with an almost instantaneous response. They weren’t the cheapest, but a member of my family had used them, albeit to carry out the relatively routine (for solicitors) task of the purchase of a house and had had a smooth experience. We agreed a price for them to assist with the purchase of the freehold, but I also made it clear that I would like for them to assist with the removal of some covenants from the original lease, they replied to say that they couldn’t guarantee that all covenants would be removed, but I knew this and as I only wanted a couple of the covenants removed, I proceeded. I signed all of the required documents and returned them without delay, where I was informed that the new deed would likely take around 2 weeks. I waited 3 weeks and chased, as I hadn’t heard anything
nothing. I allowed another week and sent another email requesting an update where I was told the deed had “just come through”. I checked over the deed and had a few questions, as the covenants I had specifically requested be removed were still in it, and there was no mention from them that they were in the process of negotiating this.

Whilst waiting for a response to my email questioning the covenants and where they were up to, I called the Heald Green office to check if we could drop in to have our ID verified, being told that we could pop in anytime. The day after, we (my fiancée and I) went to the office and was greeted by a lovely lady on the front desk who promptly verified our ID. Before we left, we asked her to check with the lady that we were dealing with to see if anything else would be needed, so that we could arrange to bring this in, keen to not prolong the process. A minute or so later we were ushered into a meeting room where we were greeted by a lady we hadn’t met or spoken to before, she either didn’t introduce herself or did so in such a way that neither me or my fiancée could catch her name but lady I would check the website and found out that she was the director of the Heald Green office. I looked up who she was because (and this is where things went south) the way in which she handled us as customers was atrocious. I asked questions about where things were up to with the covenant removal, to which I was basically told, it won’t happen as we are in a new build estate and it won’t be possible. When I replied to explain that we knew it was possible, because the very covenants we wanted removed had been removed for another couple on the site when they bought their freehold
her flippant and assumed response, “the other couple probably bought from a different builder so you cannot compare the two”. When we pointed out the entire site was built by the same builder, there was no response, she just moved on to bad mouth new build houses and how she hates them. Doing this in front of a couple who have bought a new build house (and are very happy with it) is extremely unprofessional. Nevertheless we moved on


I re-raised the question about the covenants, and again was given a brush off. Now considering that I made it clear that the removal of covenants was to be part of the deal to be basically told it wasn’t going to happen didn’t sit well, and it appeared that it wasn’t going to happen because Mounteney’s couldn’t be bothered fighting the case for us, not because it wasn’t possible to have them removed, as we had already proven it was possible. I mentioned this to the director and again, a flippant response followed
”well I charge £300 plus VAT an hour, so you won’t want me racking up bills or your will be upset with me”. This started alarm bells, as we were now being told that there would be extortionate extra charges for something we requested a quotation on in the beginning. Remember when I said the other firm warned me
well hear it was, happening as they had predicted.

Her attitude meant that we felt we weren’t going to get anywhere, so we decided to leave, feeling very angry, stressed and concerned at the state of things. I decided to send an email to the owner of the business, which Mounteney’s request their customers to do should they have a complaint. I thought this direct approach implied that this rather small firm (compared to the competition) had a rather personal approach and so I was confident that our meeting was just a blip, expecting a pleasant response from the owner, where we could put this experience to bed and move on. This is where things went from really bad, to quite unbelievable. My complaint email, which was politely worded (I can put a copy of this on this review should Mounteney’s come respond to this to say otherwise
but I will also show their horrendous responses) was balanced and praised the individuals of whom I had had a pleasant dealing with and raised concerns about our meeting, which might I add I didn’t expect (I only asked for the kind lady to check if anything else was needed and merely expected an instruction back, if anything). The response I got was totally unprofessional, which the owner stated, and I quote was a “meaningless verbal assault I assume is intended to intimidate – a strange tactic to adopt toward a professional litigator”. It is because I was raising a complaint with a “professional litigator” that I was shocked at his response. Might I add, that just because you are classed as a “professional” doesn’t mean you are acting as one, your attitude and behaviour dictates this, not your profession.

He basically was unhappy that I was complaining, and effectively told me to “go away”. He offered to “walk away” with no fee, which I of course gladly accepted and I do not want to pay these people a penny, instead taking my business to a more deserving company. I believe he offered this because they mis-quoted and it effectively would get them out of having to cover the cost of additional work for free. In addition to this, there was more mis-quoting on costs, as the owner bluntly referred me to their terms stating their additional costs, showing them at £240 plus VAT per hour for a director’s work, yet the director at Heald Green quoted £300 per hour
this doesn’t add up, which is it??

When I replied to say that I was shocked at his response, he again replied in an unprofessional manner by stating that as I had a complaint “he should PROBABLY send me the complaints procedure”. When I stated that he shouldn’t treat paying customers in this way, his response was, and again I quote “I was unaware you were a paying customer – I’ll check your ledger and refund your payment tomorrow.” To which I replied “From your comment below, does this mean that a client who you are working for but is yet to pay is treated differently to someone who has paid up front, somehow I doubt it...”, he didn’t reply.
***To summarise - The owner of the company simply does not care about his customers, which is why I implore you to use an alternative firm, and give Mounteney’s a wide berth. They will mis-quote you, deny it, even though I have the mis-quotation in writing and will then condescend you, belittle you and refuse to assist when you raise a complaint. If this review means that just one person doesn’t have to have the appalling experience that I have had, this review will be worthwhile, but I hope that it has a far bigger impact, and only then will the owner consider treating his customers in an acceptable manner***

2019幎7月19日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報