レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

䌁業情報


連絡先

2.1

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

11件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

This company is appalling.

This company is an outrageously incompetent empty shell company. From repeated change in their staff to neglectful practices. The "Director" Jordan will then hassle you to get you to remove the one star review because he obviously tampered with the googlemap reviews. Steer clear. Their 12 months free management is not worth it as you will end up losing way more money than that.

2026幎5月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Extremely disappointing property Management

Extremely disappointing property management experience.

After they found the worst tenat ever, stopping paying rent 1 month after they got the property, our tenancy matter was affected by repeated administrative errors, missed deadlines, defective VCAT applications, and poor communication. Two Tribunal applications were struck out due to procedural issues, significantly delaying the eviction process and prolonging the tenant’s occupation without payment.

We repeatedly had to follow up directly with VCAT ourselves to obtain updates.

The delays caused significant financial hardship and stress for our family.

The overall handling of the matter was far below expectations.

Would not recommend.

2026幎3月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Rotten from the Top – Systemic Incompetence and Zero Accountability at Rent On Time – Steer Clear

Rent On Time is rotten from the owner/director level straight down. They manage my portfolio across four states, and after 16+ months of chronic failures, ignored instructions, unauthorised actions, and empty responses to direct escalations to the owner, I have zero confidence left. This isn’t about a few slip-ups—it’s a consistent top-down culture of negligence, poor oversight, and refusal to fix broken processes.

The pattern mirrors what I’ve seen before, but the latest incidents push it over the edge:
1. Ongoing Administrative Errors & Unauthorised Payments‹Despite crystal-clear written instructions (Start of contract, every 3-4 months due to errors, most recently Dec 2024 and Feb 2026) that I pay full water bills directly and they invoice tenants only for usage, they processed the entire bill on for a property. I’d already paid the council—duplicate payment, funds unnecessarily tied up. Raised Feb 2026; required three follow-ups before any reply. They hid behind “internal process” instead of owning the error or breach of authority. This was the second recent duplicate—same issue elsewhere in the portfolio and at least fifth during the managment period.

2. Unauthorised Tenancy Termination & Bond Handling‹A tenancy commenced in Feb 2026. Tenant issued Notice to Leave. Rent On Time accepted it, refunded bond/funds, treated the lease as terminated, and re-advertised—all without consulting me or seeking instructions. I discovered only when chasing non-payment a week later. Result: 8-day vacancy (~$760 lost rent). No analysis of Form 13 validity, no discussion of disputing it or tribunal referral. Reckless breach of fiduciary duty and Form 6 authority limits.

3. Maintenance & Compliance: Chronic Delays and Neglect‹Smoke alarms, termite inspections (requested nearly a year ago with quotes provided), general repairs—nothing moves without relentless chasing. Quotes often inflated, urgency absent. Cleaning quotes requested Dec 2025 took seven weeks for one quote; delays contributed to applicant withdrawals and the February tenancy collapse.

4. Fee Errors, Record Inaccuracies & Bond Discrepancies‹Annual fees charged early despite assurances. Management dates recorded wrong. Bond ledgers mismatched ($2,660 advised vs $2,440 shown; clarified only after query). Corrections demand multiple follow-ups.

5. Condition Reports, Exit Reporting & Tenant Issues‹Incomplete entry/condition reports (tenants asked to self-complete sections, undisclosed). Exit reports deficient (missing prior comparisons, water readings). Tenants contact me directly because agency fails to handle inspections, maintenance, or communications properly.

6. Market Advice & Proactive Management Failures‹Lease renewal suggestions without market comparables—I do my own research to avoid under or over-pricing. Letting fees charged despite immediate tenancy collapse due to agency delays.

7. Escalations to the Owner: All Talk, No Action‹Every significant issue escalated directly to the owner multiple times over months. Zero accountability, and the same errors recur. No systemic fixes. This screams leadership failure—if the top won’t enforce standards, the whole operation stays broken.

8. Superficial “Changes” – Window Dressing Only‹Rental statements now split by state, with mentions of “dedicated state resources.” Sounds like internal restructuring (possibly prepping to sell the business), but service remains identical trash. No uplift in accuracy, responsiveness, or proactivity. Reactive chaos continues; landlord micromanagement is still required to prevent losses.

9. Transparency & Perpetual Marketing Gimmicks‹Long-running “free offer” extensions. Limited visible public feedback channels. Classic avoidance.

Bottom Line
Across multiple properties and states, I’ve had to actively manage basic tasks to avoid financial hits—duplicate payments, lost rent, inflated costs. Despite repeated escalations to the highest level and supposed operational tweaks, nothing materially improves. This top-down negligence disregards statutory duties of care, skill, honesty, and best interests under relevant state tenancy laws and Australian Consumer Law.

I have no confidence in Rent On Time’s systems, leadership, or integrity. Already pursuing regulatory complaints to highlight the pattern. Landlords: avoid them entirely. Your time, money, and properties deserve better.

Update March 2026:
Following publication of this review, the company issued a written threat demanding removal, without identifying any specific factual inaccuracy. The response focused on legal intimidation than on evidence to dispute the matters raised.

2025幎9月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

DO NOT TRUST THESE PEOPLE

This business is a clown car. Nearly impossible to contact. No inspections carried out on my property. The second years commission taken in advance out of my rental income without prior notice, and before I could terminate them. Remember - if it sounds too good to be true, it is Rentontime.com.au.

2026幎1月27日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

There is no direct phone number to Rent


There is no direct phone number to Rent On Time. Each time you call you are directed to a answering service who take down all your details and pass them on.
I have been trying to talk to someone at Rent on Time for the past day with no success.
I wanted to respond to an email that was sent to me regarding Smoke detectors at a property Rent on Manage.
I have sent two emails and numerous phone calls, no answer.
Maybe they have gone out of business?
Any company that does not provide a direct phone number, be wary.
2 stars from me.

2026幎1月19日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Where do I start

Where do I start. I was recently with rent on time for about 18 months. From the get go it was turbulent. I gave the then property manager all the info I could, including bills to obtain, maintenance to get quoted, etc. Over the entire time, the maintenance I wanted quoted and finalised, still hadn't been done. I lost count how many times I requested it, received no response, no action, and asked to send the info again and again. I also lost count how many times the property manager changed without notice. Property managers rarely obtained the water usage bills, again asking countless times and even the craziest part, the rent was sporadic. Ironic. First it was fortnightly, then it became monthly without notice, then it just became whenever they felt like it. I recently contacted rent on time to ask why rent hadnt been paid to me for 7 weeks. A few hours later I received the rent but got no response. This kind of behaviour had been going from about 6 months into the arrangement. It was actually torturous and stressful. I felt like I was managing the manager, but the manager was an adolescent with their first job. After this experience, I'm extremely cautious about who I adopt from now on. I don't even know how my house is actually going! Or if it's in good condition! I know nothing about it because the manager never does anything!

2026幎1月9日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The most useless property managers I


The most useless property managers I have ever known. Did not do the first inspection until 10 months into the lease and only after I hounded them. Never return phone calls. They are now keeping the rent owed to me to meet the $1300 payment due in 7 weeks. Which is illegal. I have now lodged a complaint with Office of Fair trading. DO NOT GO NEAR THEM!!!

2025幎12月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Save yourself the hassle

1. Ongoing Administrative Errors & Unauthorised Payments
The latest incident involved Rent On Time paying a water bill without authorisation, even though instructions were clearly written. The payment was admitted as an error on 1 December — yet no action was taken for over two weeks. Each follow-up was ignored or met with excuses.
The owner’s response? Deflect responsibility and point back to staff who already acknowledged the mistake. This shows a complete lack of internal control and accountability.

2. Maintenance & Compliance: Slow, Overpriced, and Poorly Managed
Maintenance jobs continue to be quoted at inflated rates and handled with little urgency.
Smoke alarm and compliance items routinely drag on for months. A termite inspection I requested almost a year ago — with quotes supplied — still hasn’t been actioned.
As a landlord, I’ve had to chase nearly every open item, defeating the purpose of paying for management.

3. Fee Errors & Broken Promises
Despite written assurances that annual fees would only start after full takeover, they charged fees early, misrecorded management start dates, and then ignored multiple written requests to correct the errors.
These are not one-off mistakes — they show a pattern of poor process integrity.

4. Tenant & Property Management Failures
Tenants have contacted me directly because Rent On Time asked them to perform inspection duties.
Maintenance requests are frequently mishandled, with staff passing issues around and offering contradictory or incomplete responses.
Exit and condition reports are consistently inaccurate and require correction by third parties.

5. Market Appraisals With No Data or Understanding
Rent On Time repeatedly provides lease renewal recommendations far below market, often without a single comparable property. I’ve had to conduct my own research each time to prevent losing rental income.

6. Serious Communication & Accountability Issues
The “single point of contact” claim is fiction. Almost every issue is handed off to someone new, causing circular communication and unresolved actions.
The owner, Jordan, presents well in writing but fails to deliver any real follow-through. Even after acknowledging errors, the firm does not learn or improve.

7. Questionable Marketing Practices
Their long-running “free offer” campaign keeps extending and feels more like a marketing gimmick than genuine value.
There is also still no dedicated Google Review listing, which conveniently limits public feedback.

âž»

Bottom Line

Rent On Time operates more like a call centre than a professional property management company.
The volume of errors, the lack of accountability, and the repeated need for me to micromanage basic tasks show that the business is not equipped to manage properties reliably.

After repeated unresolved issues — including fresh ones even after a Fair Trading complaint — I have zero confidence in their systems or leadership.

If you value competence, transparency, and proper management of your investment, I strongly recommend looking elsewhere.

2025幎11月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Don't be Fooled By First Year Free.

Don't be Fooled By First Year Free.
No Co-Ordination; they can't really lease the property, it will stay on the market because of the above ;
And no reply to emails ; no calls answered ; there is a Puseudo Property Manager who is not a property manager who even don't conduct inspections himself.
Please ..do not get into trap ..a huge penatly to leave them once signed

2025幎11月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Do not use **Rent on time**

I had an bad experience with **Rent on Time**. I received an invoice $1460 for services I did not use, followed by emails from a debt collector. Despite multiple attempts to resolve the issue via email, it remains unresolved.

I intend to take formal legal action against Rental on Time and e-Collect for harassment and wrongful debt collection.

2025幎6月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち2の評䟡

Exit fee $1300 within 12 month fee free offer

They have an exit fee hidden in fine print I was not aware of, $1300 per property taken after termination within 12 month free offer period. Perceived poor performance, such as unpaid utility / BC / rates bills and unresponsive to those providers requesting payment. Not for us unfortunately.

2025幎7月1日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報