レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら


連絡先

2.5

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2.5

5件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Horrific Service

Horrific service. DO NOT USE. They came out to repair a Samsung dishwasher and left saying the pump was bad. Two days later the technician returned and said he could not do the repair because the dishwasher was hard-wired to our home. Our dishwasher is plugged in under our sink, it's not hard wired. They rescheduled and said that we need to remove the dishwasher from the cabinet. This is completely b.s. NEVER USE THIS SERVICE, they will do anything to avoid doing the work.

2026幎5月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Purchased a Samsung refrigerator and it


Purchased a Samsung refrigerator and it stopped working. Called Samsung and they put in contact with quick service. Scheduled an appointment for an appliance that was under warranty. BEFORE they would even come they needed to charge 140.00. IT IS NEVER A GOOD IDEA TO PAY FOR A SERVICE BEFORE YOU RECIEVE IT. BUT FOOLISHLY I DID. So tech? arrives and says it hasn't been plugged in for 48 hours and can't touch it and leaves. I was never verbally told this nor was it in the e mail they sent for preparation for service and refused to refund my 140.00. Why would I keep an appliance plugged in that was faulty? Could it catch on fire while we were at work? Would DEFINITELY NOT RECOMMEND THIS COMPANY OR SAMSUNG PRODUCTS.

2026幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Be cautious

Be cautious. This company doesn’t actually repair appliances. They send someone out, do a basic “diagnostic,” then claim the unit isn’t repairable. There are a lot of similar complaints.
In my case, the technicians didn’t even know how to open the dryer. I had to show them. They focused on the wrong issue, then left saying they needed parts they didn’t have. After that, no follow-up at all. They took $140 and disappeared.
I had already identified the problem (drum felt coming loose), and it was a straightforward repair. A week later, I was told the parts were “discontinued” and the dryer couldn’t be fixed, which should have been verified before charging me. I was able to find compatible parts myself, but they still refused to do the repair and instead pushed me to buy a new $2,000 unit.
This feels like a bait-and-switch, charging for a service they don’t intend to complete. In California, that can raise consumer protection concerns.
I’d strongly recommend reporting them to the California Attorney General and being cautious with any company that claims a repair isn’t possible after already taking your money.

2026幎1月26日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

⭐ 1 Star – Nearly 3 Weeks Without a Working Refrigerator

I am extremely frustrated with the service I have received from Service Quick Inc. regarding my Samsung refrigerator.

My refrigerator stopped cooling on February 28th, and the earliest appointment available was March 6th, leaving me without a refrigerator for nearly a week before a technician even arrived.

When the technicians came out on March 6th, one attempted to troubleshoot while the other spent most of the visit sitting on his phone. The technician eventually stated that the issue appeared to be a micro-leak in the refrigerant system, though he admitted he could not actually locate the leak. Instead, he replaced the refrigerant with one containing UV dye so the leak could supposedly be found later if the fridge failed again.

The refrigerator failed again on March 10th, less than a week later.

Service Quick returned on March 12th, sending the same technicians. After about an hour of troubleshooting, they stated their original diagnosis was incorrect and that the issue might instead be related to internal piping. I was told another team would come out on March 16th to flush the system.

However, when March 16th arrived, no one showed up and I never received the promised call.

When I contacted Service Quick at 12:30 PM, I was told that I was not scheduled at all, meaning the technicians who visited on March 12th never scheduled the follow-up appointment they said they would.

The earliest they could now come out is March 19th.

At this point, I have been without a working refrigerator and freezer for nearly three weeks, and have had to purchase ice every couple days just to keep essential food from spoiling.

To make matters worse, the service documentation from the March 12th visit contains no meaningful notes, only the word “reschedule,” and it wasn’t even signed.

The entire experience has been unprofessional, poorly documented, and extremely frustrating.

If this issue is not resolved quickly, I will continue sharing this experience on other platforms so customers are aware of the level of service they can expect.

2026幎3月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Samsung can do better.

To think that a reputable brand, such as Samsung, does business with this company is beyond me. They charge $140 for a diagnostic fee already knowing that the product is not repairable. I sent photos of the TV screen, the model number, and the serial number. The technician walks in, glances at the TV, and without looking at the TV’s model # or serial number says, “you have to replace the screen.” He performed ZERO diagnostic tests. This told me right off the bat that this “service company” charged me a $140 fee for a problem that they already knew would require a new screen. The technician said, “this models LEDs can’t be replaced. The whole screen has to be changed.” No person needed to be dispatched out. I understand business is business, but this is misleading and just
wrong. I will be making a complaint to the California Attorney General’s consumer complaint department and to Samsung. Hopefully Samsung will find a more reputable repair company.

2026幎2月5日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報