Scottish Public Services Ombudsman レビュヌ 105

•
TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1.5

1.3

レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

レビュアヌのコメントを芋おみたしょう

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Filled in an online form with the details of my complaint got an Email back stating I would get a response in 3 days, 7 days later I had no reply, sent another Email, it stated I would get a rep... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Nothing but email replies saying we have your complaint followed by over 12 emails..Click continue complaint and complaint does not exist.Useless site with no human contact at all followed by minimum... もっず芋る

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

An absolute waste of time!!!! The SPSO describe themselves as an independent body providing fair and unbiased decisions on complaints

Rubbish!!!! Public services already know the outcome i... もっず芋る

䌁業情報

さたざたな倖郚゜ヌスから提䟛された情報

The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) is the final stage for complaints about councils, the National Health Service, housing associations, colleges and universities, prisons, most water providers, the Scottish Government and its agencies and departments and most Scottish authorities.


連絡先

1.3

ひどい

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の1.5

105件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

ネガティブなレビュヌに回答しおいたせん

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Total waste of time

Total waste of time, I wouldn't waste my time again with this service in the future. I am unsure why public money is being wasted on this body as they are not fit for purpose. Evidence of malpractice and quite frankly corruption and they still back up the local authority. How are we ever going to get change in our broken systems when the bodies set up to take on these cases just pretends like nothing happened.

Ms Agnew was presented with the fact that a Multinational fast food restaurant moved into our building erecting massive equipment on the back of the building with zero planning permission. This goes against the City Development Plan that was set up on the back of legislation so is law and must be followed by a local authority.

Myself and neighbours reported to GCC at the time and they completed an "enforcement investigation" which said everything was above board. By the time I got the council to ADMIT there wasn't planning permission they then hid behind the 4 year planning law & the equipment would automatically get planning permission, even although there had been complaint after complaint involving councillors, MPs and MSPs. Ms Agnew never took any of this into consideration and ruled in favour of GCC. She is clearly not capable of doing her job and the SPSO needs to be investigated by the Scottish government to understand if they are truly fit for purpose.

I have been left with a flat in Glasgow's West End that at the height of the recent boom in house sales I could not even sell. Everyone loved the flat but were concerned about having to live above a chicken shop (which is an at risk business and has increased our insurance liabilities as such) & about the noise created by the equipment.

I would also note that like many govt. agency's SPSO like to play the 20 working days rule for FOI requests. This is a trick used by GCC and SPSO where they send you the reply at 4pm on the 20th day no matter how trivial the answer & even when it's them saying they can't answer the request. This is a little game they all play so that things take so long they can then turn around & say "oh we're really sorry to much time has passed".

I wish theses agencies would understand there set up for the people.

2023幎5月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Waste of time

Used this organisation quite a few times now. Not fit for purpose. They negotiate with the very people you are complaining about. They reluctantly investigate and it's not in your favour. The investigators are hit and miss and I would strongly urge you to take your complaint somewhere else. The papers, a magazine, a solicitor. Anywhere but this organisation. It will be a total waste of your time and energy. This is why nothing in this country improves. They have the power and do very little with it.

2023幎6月21日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Two Appeals were made to the SPSO


Two Appeals were made to the SPSO surrounding serious environmental issues, that were harmful to health and property, but the SPSO amalgamated the appeals and got totally lost as to just what was happening. There was no-one within the SPSO who could get to grips with the case files, showing a complete disregard for the Appellant and their family, but favouring the Public authority causing the problem of sewage discharging into everyones property including a graveyard. Only one reference number was provided which demonstrates that the SPSO amalgamated these Appeals, but deny doing so. A huge error on their part. Not any part of the Two Appeals have been addressed even though Rosemary Agnew was meant to have personally Reviewed the Appeals. The Public Authority who was being investigated by the SPSO told me that the SPSO told them not to talk to me anymore. Is this true - I have asked for copies of all correspondence and despite being told this would be couried to me by the SPSO, nothing has been received to-date. The SPSO are nothing less than a quango organisation where complete and utter bias is shown to the public authorities they are meant to investigate. DO NOT GO TO THE SPSO UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, but find an outlet where you can get heard fairly and equitably. Clearly from the Bad Reviews posted I am not alone in my experience. The SPSO needs a shake-up where a new insightful Ombudsman would be a great asset to shedding the old hard-bitten and complacent habits of the current regime. This happened with the Scottish Information Commissioner and what a great organisation they have now turned out to be.

2023幎6月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Totally agree with all reviews

Totally agree with all reviews. You wait over 12 months just for your case to be read. Certainly not good experience taking up complaints regarding NHS Tayside. NHS certainly good at covering themselves big time over errors in care and treatment. Having worked previously within NHS as health professional for many years until early ill health retirement, It has been an eye opener on receiving end of poor care and treatment. Apologies from NHS board on few matters doesn't make situation right. Should have been thoroughly investigated by Ombudsman as errors had been made and clinicians disagreeing with each other over a diagnosis was shocking resulting in my life turned upside down. No confidence in Public Ombudsman and as previous reviews highlighted also I did not feel they were independent and Scottish Government needs to overall this service as it isn't fit for purpose and basically response letter was a cut and pasted version from NHS Tayside complaints response. After months waiting on my case to be looked at it was a waste of time and stress trying to have NHS Tayside take accountability for their incompetence and failures. Have no trust in NHS Tayside due to their cover ups and public Ombudsman who aren't impartial exploring clinical failures.

2023幎3月3日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Unprofessional, insensitive, highly incompetent

Unprofessional, insensitive and highly incompetent. Strung along for months in relation to a complaint about Forth Health Board only for the final, flawed, inaccurate and biased Decision Notice to be published without prior notification and a number serious allegations and questions outstanding. Don’t waste your time with them!

2023幎2月15日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

I haven't used the SPSO but was


I haven't used the SPSO but was recommended to use it by the local MP and Citizens Advice Bureau following my mistreatment by NHS Borders resulting in my formal complaint to NHS Borders which was later mishandled by the Trust. So glad I didn't use it in the end after reading all the disturbing reviews. Not everyone who has written these reviews can be wrong can they as much as NHS Scotland would like to blame them. Yet another shambolic waste of tax- payers' money.

2021幎11月16日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

A total waste of time

A total waste of time.
The SPSO carried out no investigation as the Council blatantly broke policy, rules and regulations. To make matters worse, part of the complaint was a public safety concern which was supported by irrefutable evidence which was totally ignored in both the original complaint and the complaint review.

2022幎4月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Just as incompetent and corrupt as the


Just as incompetent and corrupt as the organisations for which they act as gatekeeper’s. Not to be trusted and quite frankly they appear to exist simply to tick the box of “Independent Arbitrators”. Which they clearly are not. Don’t expect any impartial, fair and transparent investigation, that is not their function. In a way it stands to reason that an organisation funded by the very organisations that they are expected to Police is unlikely to be fit for purpose. An utter disgrace. They are the reason why so many organisations have to be reported in the first place. The very fact that 95% of contributors on Trustpilot have given “Poor” ratings as opposed to 5% “Excellent” ratings should make the Scottish Government sit up and take notice. This organisation is FAILING the very people it was set up to PROTECT and on whose behalf they should be arbitrating. It is clear they need replacing or cleaning out.

2022幎3月25日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The SPSO only seem to exist to protect


The SPSO only seem to exist to protect public authorities from genuine scrutiny when things go wrong.
They are all part of the problem and that is why the public will never get a fair level of service whilst these expensive and corrupt organisations are there to sweep the dirt under the carpet for the incompetence and malpractice of the large public service bodies.
They themselves should be investigated for misleading the public and being dishonest about their true operational nature.

2022幎2月24日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SPSO Not Independent

SPSO are not independent they always favour in the organisation being complained about. What is also disturbing is during a complaint, when an upheld provisional decision is all uphelded, then the organisation being complained about write to the SPSO complaining about the first original advisor used and criticises their professional judgement and demands another advisor! Since when did an independent Ombudsman take orders from the NHS telling them what to do? The SPSO are not being fully independent and I think another independent Ombudsman that is not related to the Scottish Government needs to be created for fair and accurate investigations. The SPSO are adding to the trauma and stress that the organisations created. They are obvious working together to ensure that no NHS trust or Local Authority is held accountable for neglect, failure and abuse to the public.

2022幎2月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

The biggest corrupt organisation I have


The biggest corrupt organisation I have had to deal with , I asked for a transcript of the call I had with a member of the staff was told on the phone all calls are recorded I asked her is this call being recorded she said yes !!!!! Now I no the advisor has given me false information and also said things that she should not had said that is why I wanted the proof but low and behold this conversation was lost not recorded or you mean this is a stitch up and we need to get rid of the evidence for years people have been going to this corrupt organisation and thousands have been rejected or been lied to by this organisation we need to get this corrupt organisation closed get a independent organisation in the people that get paid don't have a clue this is shocking I have asked for a public investigation into this case let's see if I get it cause I have evidence of my own that will rock this organisation and hopefully close it bet I don't even get a response 🀬🀬🀬

2022幎1月31日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Simple awful

The SPSO is partial constantly acting in favour of the council housing and the housing associations, incompetent they cannot distinguish a genuine complaint where there is a breach of the law, discriminatory they discriminate tenants in favour of the council and the housing associations for which they work for
.dealing with them is a waste of time


2021幎9月17日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

SPSO Malfeasant God Complex.

I agree with most of the comments on here. The SPSO is an absolute disgrace.
The evidence of malpractice and malfeasance by local authority is plain as day yet the SPSO just spew gibberish which does not make sense.
Disgusting organisation.

2021幎9月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Let's fight to get this corrupt


Let's fight to get this corrupt organisation closed its run so all local authorities will never have to come clean I told them that a local authorities had to consult with taxi drivers when fees go up under a section of Scottish law the council in their lies said we had a meeting yet 7 taxi driver will under oath say that was never discussed yet cause the lies from a council and the corrupt organisation agree you won't win so don't use these corrupt organisation I am willing to give you free legal advice the best to my knowledge on matters that if I can help save you coming to this corrupt organisation look under Scottish Paralegal Services and email me I won a case against a council fighting it on my own this was just to prove to people that this corrupt organisation won't help use as you will see by the 1 star reviews

2021幎7月2日
自発的なレビュヌ

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報