レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋であるため、特定の蚘茉内容を怜蚌するこずはありたせん。ただし、ビゞネス䞊の取匕が行われたこずを確認できた堎合、レビュヌに「確認枈み」のラベルを付ける堎合がありたす。詳现はこちら

プラットホヌムの健党性を維持するため、圓瀟のプラットフォヌム䞊のすべおのレビュヌは、確認枈みか吊かにかかわらず、幎䞭無䌑で皌働する自動゜フトりェアによっお審査されおいたす。このテクノロゞヌは、本圓の経隓に基づいおいないレビュヌなど、ガむドラむンに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削陀するよう蚭蚈されおいたす。ただし、すべおを怜知できるわけではありたせんので、お気づきの点がございたしたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳现はこちら

2.2

期埅以䞋

TrustScore 5段階評䟡の2

17件のレビュヌ

5぀星
4぀星
3぀星
2぀星
1぀星

この䌁業のTrustpilot 利甚方法

レビュヌや評䟡の取埗方法、スコアリング、モデレヌションのプロセスに぀いお確認する。

Trustpilot に参加しおいる䌁業は、むンセンティブを提䟛したり、レビュヌを非衚瀺にするためにお金を払ったりするこずは蚱可されおいたせん。レビュヌはレビュアヌの個人的な意芋で、Trustpilot のものではありたせん。詳现はこちら

5぀星のうち1の評䟡

C’est une arnaque

Le systÚme de crédits est une arnaque sans nom. Le logiciel propose des textes à peine meilleures que d’autres IA gratuites sur le marché.
Il y a peu de crédits par rapport à ce que vous payez, et ils disparaissent vite.
La majorité de ce que propose Sudo peut être effectué par d’autres IA à moindre coût.

2026幎4月10日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Tried the free trial...

Tried the free trial, ran out after having it try to rephrase a section twice. It would make it more wordy with more cliche and cheesy prose. I got better suggestions from ChatGPT and Deepseek. I don't know if Muse is better without Sudo, but it's hard to imagine it's any worse.

2026幎2月14日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Thieves

Thieves! Signed up for the Pro. Didn't use it much. Wiped all my credits at the end of the month. Stayed. Same thing happened next month. 2 million credits stolen!
I paid for those credits, but if you don't use them all by the end of the month they steal them from you, and you are forced to pay again... such a scam!

2026幎1月12日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Scammers love the site!

After joining at the free tier I began getting "Hey author, let me help you..." spam daily. I haven't even had time to look at their site, but I have zero faith that my work won't get sold like my email has.

2025幎12月1日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

A really weird app

Editing because, having signed up via a link which said I got 1,000,000 credits, I didn't notice I only had 10,000 credits which was the free trial amount, because apparently I can't count zeroes. After that I did get enough credits to actually play with some of the functions. It seems like credits go far enough.
I'm still not very impressed, the ai is not so good and the feedback function still seems to only read a scene at a time. Unless I paste every scene into one document, 'feedback' will ask me who characters are or tell me the story ends abruptly (obvs, it's a scene).

The suggestions are usually worse than my own writing which is an impressive feat. It suggests a lot of filler words and uses a lot of repeating words and purple prose. It's saved somewhat by the user made plugins, which while still touch and go do at least provide some usable suggestions and feedback. It seems to work best when you use multiple plugins and look for commonalities in feedback and suggestions.

I'd really like a desktop app, and an easier way to make the feedback function read the whole manuscript if it exists.

2025幎3月22日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち3の評䟡

Works fine, kinda fun but mundane prose!

The app works well, it's reasonably priced and fun to use. But the writing is pretty horrible. I uploaded a rough draft of one of my ongoing novels just for kicks to see if it would spark some more dialogue ideas, and it's just bland and cliche'd. More like how not to write. But I do like how it breaks down the chapters and organizes the world building, character profiles, etc...if something like this would merge with Scrivener for the organization alone, it would be heaven....

2025幎3月13日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Suodwrite is very aptly named

I signed up for Sudowrite over two years ago. They had several admitted glitches but they gave word credits (they went by word back then) to make up for it. Then, they switched over to just credits.

After that, the system was glitchy all the time. Including I would click for it to write beats, but it wouldn't. It said it did. It took credits like it did but nothing happened.

I wrote to Support, repeatedly, sending screen shots and was primarily ignored. Twice, someone said they checked it out and everything worked fine.

I paid over $200 for those two years, plus I had bought extra credits (over 1M) for about $50. So, all in all, close to $300.

Never once did I get any satisfactory writing done on their site after the initial try out. Just to be sure of what I was experiencing, I went onto different computers, different browsers. No mater what I did, my entire account was screwy.

When I told them I would not sign up again until all these problems were addressed in a satisfactory manner they told me I could still have access to and use my credits to write but I would not be able to use some of the fancier functions ("fancier functions" my term, not theirs).

It was a lie. I got a notice, when I tried to do just that, which told me I could not do any writing on that site without paying for a plan. Including that I could not access the credits I paid extra for.

I chatted with their AI "help" and it told me that they do not give refunds. So, basically, they stole near $300 from me while wasting two years of my life.

They do not make writing fun again, or whatever they say. They make it a terrible, heartbreaking, joyless burden and needless expense.

The concept was nice. Af first, it seemed promising. The actual use is a Orwellian nightmare.

2025幎3月5日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Imbarazzante

Sudowrite si presenta come un assistente per scrittori, ma la realtà Ú ben diversa: Ú solo un generatore di testi mediocre con un abbonamento esoso. L’IA produce contenuti banali, ripetitivi e spesso privi di senso logico, costringendo lo scrittore a fare più lavoro di revisione che se avesse scritto tutto da zero.

L’interfaccia Ú basilare, le funzionalità promesse sono poco più che fumo negli occhi e, per coronare il tutto, il prezzo Ú scandalosamente alto rispetto al valore offerto. Un software che sembra progettato più per spennare gli ingenui che per aiutare chi scrive davvero.

Se pensate di risparmiare tempo o migliorare la vostra scrittura con Sudowrite, preparatevi a una cocente delusione. Meglio investire in un buon corso di scrittura o, ancora meglio, tenersi i soldi.

2025幎2月18日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Great App, bad customer experience.

Great App, but too expensive for what they give you. I decided to buy a month to test it out in October. I also cancelled my account in October, but they've tried to charge me for November and December. Luckily, I was smart enough to use a secondary account that I can fund independently when testing out these services due to companies like this being unscrupulous.

It says that my account will end in December 16, so I'll update if they try to charge me again.

Edit: Not even an hour after I posted this, they tried to charge me again in the same day.

2024幎11月30日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Thieves

Thieves! Signed up for the Pro. Didn't use it much. Wiped all my credits at the end of the month. Stayed. Same thing happened next month. 2 million credits stolen.

2024幎7月4日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

If I could give it 0 stars I would

If I could give it 0 stars I would. I tried to cancel subscription, they send no confirmation and then bill you anyway when renewal is due. They do not respond to multiple emails disputing the charge. To make matters worse, they don't allow you to delete your card details from their site, so I had to cancel my card so they don't charge again at their discretion! Just don't with this scam.

2024幎3月11日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち1の評䟡

Ambiguous Terms and Conditions - Who Owns Your Work?

I have asked his site several times whether their AI is Artificial General Intelligence, and whether our work is used to improve itself. Yet I have not received a reply.

As a creator, I want to know my work is mine, even if I am only using this site to improve my (already fully created) works. Their Terms and Conditions are vague and ambiguous, at best, and the fact they refuse to reply to personal emails asking important intellectual property questions is disturbing and makes me suspicious, as it should make anyone. Their Terms and Conditions, which outline their the agreement, states:

"This Agreement does not transfer to you any intellectual property owned by the Operator or third parties, and all rights, titles, and interests in and to such property will remain (as between the parties) solely with the Operator."

However, it does not clearly define what is classes at its IP. If I am inputting my work, then it should not become theirs because I have used their website to aid or help me improve my work. That work is still mine, yet their terms do not say this.

Although I only use this service for my previously created work, I would suggest Sudowrties' terms are even more worrisome if you do not create the work beforehand. Why, as a service provider, can't you clarify 'clearly' that the works produced belong to the receiver/consumer? Whether reworked with Sudowrites' help or paid for by a consumer, it should belong to the customer who spends all the hours making the changes needed. After all, that's what they're paying for. So, why not make this clear in your Terms and Conditions?

Sudowrites appear to check Trustpilot to guide itself in its improvements, yet, as usual, it fails to reply to its consumers. This says a lot about any company looking to build trust and confidence with its customers.

2024幎3月23日
自発的なレビュヌ
5぀星のうち5の評䟡

What an amazing tool

What an amazing tool. Whoever has designed this really understands the writing process. There are lots of AI tools around now, and many of them are superb at producing high quality writing for business, etc, but nothing compares to Sudowrite when it comes to writing, editing and improving fiction writing. It is an absolutely pleasure to use, and has helped me to take my writing to the next level. It is like having a writing partner sat next to you, who you can turn to whenever you can't find the write word to use, or how to say what you want to say. But it goes further. It is superb and offering some assistance when you hit writer's block, and the story feature is amazing at helping to flesh out a whole novel, story arcs, and beats.

My only regret is that I wish I had more than 90,000 words a month, but can't afford to jump to the next level.

Trust me when I say it is a fiction writer's best friend. Highly recommended.

2023幎10月27日
自発的なレビュヌ

レビュヌの察象になっおいる䌁業の方ぞ

プロフィヌルを登録しお、Trustpilot の無料ビゞネス ツヌルにアクセスし、お客様ずの぀ながりを広げおください。

無料アカりントを取埗

Trustpilot ゚クスペリ゚ンス

Trsutpilot のレビュヌは誰でも曞くこずができたす。レビュヌを曞いた人には自分の曞いたレビュヌをい぀でも線集したり削陀したりする暩限があり、それらのレビュヌはアカりントがアクティブである限り衚瀺されたす。

䌁業は、自動招埅を介しおレビュヌを䟝頌するこずができたす。この方法で埗られたレビュヌは、本物の経隓に基づいたものであり、確認枈みのラベルが付䞎されたす。

他の皮類のレビュヌに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

プラットフォヌム保護のため、専門チヌムず高床なテクノロゞヌを駆䜿しおいたす。停レビュヌずの闘いに぀いおの詳现はこちらをご䞀読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュヌ プロセスの詳现に぀いおはこちらをご芧ください。

よいレビュヌを曞くための8぀のヒントをご芧ください。

確認を行うこずで、Trustpilot に投皿されるレビュヌが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実圚の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によっお曞かれたものであるこずの保蚌に぀ながりたす。

レビュヌに察しおむンセンティブを提䟛したり、遞択的にレビュヌを䟝頌したりするこずは、TrustScore にバむアスを生む可胜性がありたす。これは 圓瀟のガむドラむンに反したす。

詳现情報