レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら

プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら

企業情報

  1. 公認測量士

当該企業による記述

The largest panel of multi-disciplinary surveyors in the UK. If you are moving home, investing in property or need to carry out works, we arrange the best surveying services for you in both residential and commercial sectors. Surveys include building surveying, party wall, valuations, dilapidations, project management, expert witness and more. Available across all major cities, including London, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool, Newcastle, etc. throughout England and Wales.


連絡先

3.8

ほぼ満足

TrustScore 5段階評価の4

9件のレビュー

5つ星
4つ星
3つ星
2つ星
1つ星

ネガティブなレビューの 100%に回答しています

通常2週間以内に回答

この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法

レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。

Trustpilot に参加している企業は、インセンティブを提供したり、レビューを非表示にするためにお金を払ったりすることは許可されていません。レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見で、Trustpilot のものではありません。詳細はこちら

5つ星のうち5の評価

Additional work done FOC

Produced the valuation report, but I'd neglected to tell them about some significant improvements done to the building, so they kindly re-valued it on that basis with no extra charge.

2026年5月22日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち5の評価

The service felt organised and…

The service felt organised and professional. I did not have to chase them for updates which made things less stressful. The report was clear enough and gave a balanced view of both positives and concens.

2026年3月28日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち1の評価

Don't be fooled by the low fees

This company promotes low fees with a discount incentive to secure your instruction. We appointed them as our party wall surveyor and, ironically, out of all parties involved -  including the adjoining owner’s surveyor and our neighbour -it was Survey Merchant who left the most negative impression.

We were left with the strong impression that Nicholas was not fully familiar with the legislation surrounding party wall agreements. We did not feel that he had our best interests at heart, nor did he offer constructive suggestions to the adjoining surveyor to ensure our property was properly protected. After considerable back and forth -  during which we already felt unsupported - he then requested an additional fee, citing extra time and work incurred.  

However, it was unclear to us what additional work had actually been undertaken beyond forwarding correspondence between parties. No breakdown or explanation was provided to justify the increase, which made the request difficult to understand and accept.
If additional time was being spent beyond the original scope, it would have been reasonable and professional to inform us in advance that the quoted amount, based on an estimated timeframe, was close to being exceeded. Instead, this was only raised after the fact (pretty convenient).

When we expressed that it would have been courteous to notify us, we were told that we did not need to be informed because we were not his clients. It is difficult to describe how insulting that response was -   particularly when you appoint someone with the expectation that they are representing and protecting your interests. It felt like a complete dismissal of our position, especially given that we were not obligated to choose their company in the first place.
In addition to the unexpected fee increase, communication throughout was poor and often abrupt. They also issued a contract -  a legal document -  using an American date format (for example, 02/09/2026 instead of 09/02/2026). When we asked for this to be corrected to avoid ambiguity, no amendment was made.

My personal advice: do not be persuaded by the initial low fee. Choose a surveyor who is knowledgeable, transparent, and genuinely committed to protecting your interests. In my experience, this was one of the most unprofessional and discourteous companies I have ever dealt with.

UPDATE in response to the below:

To clarify, the adjoining surveyor has been paid - you are welcome to confirm this directly with them. The time this was paid (16:56) and the time you responded to this review (20.09), so not quite sure how it fits into the exchange?

There was an initial delay because Survey Merchant were unwilling to provide a clear breakdown of the increased costs and instead attributed the additional charges to the adjoining surveyor. This required further clarification before payment could reasonably be made.

The information you are stating is incorrect. I am happy to share the full email thread relating to this review for transparency. We did not change the scope of work. We simply requested that our corner be backed, and that a clause be inserted to ensure we were adequately protected. These were reasonable requests and should not have constituted additional work had the matter been handled efficiently from the outset.

It appeared, however, that priority was given to accommodating the adjoining surveyor rather than addressing our concerns. The additional fee was only communicated to us after the work had been completed, which we found inappropriate and unprofessional.

With regard to accepting the contents of the agreement, given our previous experience of being charged for feedback and suggestions without prior notice, we decided it was best to proceed without delay, as sadly we felt raising further points might result in additional charges.

There was also no discount applied, contrary to what has been suggested.

For these reasons, the review accurately reflects our experience and will not be amended. We hope that greater courtesy and clearer communication will be extended to future clients to help avoid similar situations.

2026年2月9日
自発的なレビュー
Survey Merchant ロゴ

Survey Merchant からの回答

Dear Nikita,

Your review is extremely surprising and unfair, given that you received a valid party wall award, which all parties accepted (including the adjoining owner’s surveyor). At no point did you ever disagree with its contents, even in draft form.

Your best interests were therefore represented, as evidenced by the agreement, which contained clauses overwhelmingly in your favour.

The reason why there was a marginal price increase of only a few hundred pounds was because you had changed the scope of the work, such as by requiring:
- review of new drawings;
- additional notice/acknowledgements forms;
- negotiation on cutting overhanging projections; and
- investigation into existing damage you say was caused by your neighbour.

A surveyor can not be expected to do extra work without additional charge, which is what you were asking for. Despite this, your surveyor had already heavily discounted the bill from what should have been at least £2,030 down to £1,295 total, which you were informed of in advance and (happily) agreed to pay. This excludes any further chargeable work.

Our average response time to your communication was within the hour or same day, as evidenced by the email trail.

The American (DocuSign) date format was inputted by the adjoining owner’s surveyor, not your surveyor, but this was clarified regardless. An award, once signed, can not be re-signed as it is now legally binding.

Now, you have changed your mind and delayed with paying the adjoining owner’s surveyor’s fees, which they had already reminded you of, and only now claim to have paid for the sake of this feedback exchange.

A cost breakdown has already been supplied to you. The discount against the number of necessary hours is evident, which the surveyor reserves the right to charge in the event of a dispute.

We therefore invite you, in the interest of fairness, to kindly revise your feedback rating, given that you received industry standard services.

5つ星のうち1の評価

Valuation required multiple follow up questions

Valuation required multiple follow up questions to clarify points as the responses provided were unclear.

2025年9月8日
自発的なレビュー
Survey Merchant ロゴ

Survey Merchant からの回答

Dear Harry,

We provided clear answers to all questions in very good time as evidenced by the email trail. You confirmed you had no further questions and you even agreed with the valuation figure.

Therefore, your review is very surprising. You also told our team that you would only take it down if we pay you money, which we refused as we can not be held to ransom.

5つ星のうち5の評価

I needed an accurate leasehold…

I needed an accurate leasehold calculation and the surveyor exceeded my expectations. He explained everything clearly and provided a breakdown of the costs, which helped me during negotiations. I would absolutely recommend them for anyone dealing with leaseholds.

2024年9月29日
自発的なレビュー
5つ星のうち5の評価

Highly recommend

I recently used Survey Merchant for a building survey and couldn't be happier with the service. The team was incredibly professional, thorough, and friendly. They explained everything in detail and answered all my questions patiently. Their report was comprehensive and easy to understand, helping me make an informed decision. I highly recommend them for anyone needing a reliable and efficient building survey.

2024年6月21日
自発的なレビュー

Trustpilot エクスペリエンス

Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。

企業は、自動招待を介してレビューを依頼することができます。この方法で得られたレビューは、本物の経験に基づいたものであり、確認済みのラベルが付与されます。

他の種類のレビューについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。

Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。

よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。

確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。

レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します

詳細情報