The IAS claims to be independent, but it is basically an operator funded rubber stamp for companies like UK CPM. Adjudicators completely ignore basic tenancy contracts and land rights. If a parking f... もっと見る
レビューはレビュアーの個人的な意見であるため、特定の記載内容を検証することはありません。ただし、ビジネス上の取引が行われたことを確認できた場合、レビューに「確認済み」のラベルを付ける場合があります。詳細はこちら
プラットホームの健全性を維持するため、当社のプラットフォーム上のすべてのレビューは、確認済みか否かにかかわらず、年中無休で稼働する自動ソフトウェアによって審査されています。このテクノロジーは、本当の経験に基づいていないレビューなど、ガイドラインに違反するコンテンツを特定し、削除するよう設計されています。ただし、すべてを検知できるわけではありませんので、お気づきの点がございましたら、どうぞお知らせください。詳細はこちら
レビュアーのコメントを見てみましょう
This just feels like a massive waste of time and a con of an experience. Takes nearly 2 months to deal with this whole thing, considering they have already come up with their conclusion before even re... もっと見る
The Independent Appeals Service appears to be anything but independent. Funded by the parking companies, there is obviously a vested interest in keeping them on board, which I'm guessing is why appe... もっと見る
I provide unquestionable photo evidence of missing and illegible signs and also highlighted that one of the photo the parking company provided as evidence was not even the same area, to my astonishm... もっと見る
レビュー依頼の記録がありません
この企業は顧客にレビューを依頼していないため、レビューが全体の意見を反映していない可能性があります。
この企業のTrustpilot 利用方法
レビューや評価の取得方法、スコアリング、モデレーションのプロセスについて確認する。
Not independent at all
What can i say. For a service that preaches and claims to be neutral it's an absolute sham and disappointing. From personal experience, they are a culprit too and work hand in hand with cooperations that benefit/profit their own selfish needs. Simply a hypocrisy. I was a firm believer that they'd come to the aid of honest struggling citizens/residents to face the cooperate mafias but little did i know i was seeking justice from an unjust biased group. I really hope that one day we'd actually get the empathy/sympathy we deserve from people with actual authority to help. It's a long winded dream that'll unlikely happen in my time given the greed and double standards.
I am livid
I am livid, frustrated and deflated ..... and I haven't even lodged my appeal. Firstly, parking company letter is received 2nd Dec leaving only 6 days to respond yet they date stamp their letter 17th Nov. Not sure what class postal service they use in the UK that takes 2 weeks! Secondly, online appeals portal does not work. I register, create password and then can't log-in. Just in case I try another email address .... same process same outcome. Several requests to reset password .... nothing. Link to request deadline extension if your reason is valid .... unavailable and directs you to a membership page.
I really don't know what to do next and my deadline of 21 days is in a day! This is ridiculous .....
Furthest thing from independent
If I could give it less stars I would. Couldn't be further from "independent". Even the parking company came to the conclusion that the penalty should be waived, but sadly, the IAS thought that it was common sense to charge the full amount despite proof of a ticket being purchased at time of incident.
No common sense, not independent, and an utter waste of time. Don't bother using. If you know you are right, fight it in court - if it makes it there.
I can totally concur with all the other…
I can totally concur with all the other reviews, I do not feel the evidence was considered as I provided photographs stating there were no signs in the area, I had paid for valid parking, and still received a fine, at no point was my evidence considered, a sign was posted on the appeal that was no where near where I parked, and just an attached sign bearing no relevance to location, but that was considered as the evidence? Absolute waste of time and effort, promoting scams for getting further money out of people who ligitimately pay for parking, sad to see such exploitation really.
The most rubbish company you can…
The most rubbish company you can possibly appeal, just trash !!!
Does not matter the proves you present, it will always rule in favour of the parking companies !!!
Useless !!!
I got a ticket for charging my electric car. Not even under the jurisdiction of the car park as those spaces are subleased. The IAS sent a standard template refusal letter acknowledging not one point I raised. Doubt they even read my compliant. Complete waste of time.
Rubbish.
Rubbish.
How can they claim to be independent if you have to be referred by the Parking Company you are in dispute with.
My Parking Company refused my appeal, but would not refer me to the, laughingly called, Independent Appeals Service
So I could not even register an appeal with them.
What a joke
The IAS decision was not independent
You will be surprised to see how IAS will award operator to charge you £100 for drop off passenger even stopping there less than 10 seconds. .
they are absolutely not independent, you can notice when you receive the decision, that IAS will not take attention to any point raised by the appellant, whole process and decision will be one sided towards the operator.
I have research through internet and also found how many people actually are victim of the PCM and IAS appeal process.
Everyone should wait to defend this, I am sure they will not win this at the end as HM Court of England will decide independently.
Having read the negative reviews I must…
Having read the negative reviews I must confess I was doubtful about even bothering to use them after the private parking company in Norwich had rejected my original appeal.
I persevered though and sent through exactly the same information that I’d previously sent to National Parking Enforcement and had been rejected within 24hrs.
I am pleased to say that following sending my appeal into IAS I have today received an email to tell me that the parking notice has been cancelled, so I can only go by my experience, and by the fact I had always believed the original fine was not deserved in my opinion, that they have demonstrated their impartiality and despite what others have said did look at supporting evidence - Thank you
Bad advice to use this company
I was advised to use this company to appeal a parking notice. I could not even register as the website kept saying the form was incorrect without telling you why, and then deleting it so you have to complete it all over again. So gave up and won't be paying the charge.
The organisation is very keen on…
The organisation is very keen on ensuring the parking permit company get more money from drivers. Don't waste your time on writing to them, would advise going through to court when confused about the ticket issued to you. They are totally scam making more money for the parking company
No one there to answer my call to give…
No one there to answer my call to give me advice.
I parked in a 2 hour limit for 2 hours…
I parked in a 2 hour limit for 2 hours 20 minutes. Guilty. G24 then took 15 days to write a letter which arrived at 21 days. I have read that a private parking company has 14 days to ensure that the notice is with the owner within 14 days. I appealed and G24 came back with a load of legal gobble stating that I had parked, there were sufficient signs etc etc. They declined my appeal.
I then went to IAS to review it. Same reply. I had parked, there were signs etc etc. BUT they were unable to comment on the legality of my comment about the timing and that I should take legal advice? well they are either in time or they are not? make a choice. Why should I pay a solicitor to appeal a £100 parking ticket? won't be paying.
Not fit for purpose
Not fit for purpose. The service is funded by the unscrupulous ticket cowboys, say no more.
Similar to other reviews here
Similar to other reviews here. I paid for parking however part of the payment was made in error but proof of parking payment was provided. According to IAS they agreed with the 'company' that I didn't pay. All s sham and probably needs some sort of legal review of the IAS practices and processes. Anyway, I won't be using Cornwall beaches anymore unless I walk there.
Awful service
Awful service. Despite acknowledging that I clearly paid for parking (evidence provided via bank statements and telephone records), the IAS stated that I must have entered my registration plate incorrectly and that the car parking services’ system “appeared to be working”. There is no concrete evidence that I entered my reg plate incorrectly over the phone, and there isn’t evidence to support that there were 100% no errors made with recording payments on the car parking services’ systems. Logically, as I am only the registered keeper of one vehicle, any payment made by me extends to proof of payment for my car. I spend weeks going back and forth with the IAS and the parking company, providing all sorts of evidence and statements. Utter waste of time. The IAS were, in my opinion, not impartial or even remotely supportive.
Not independent- just part of the parking scam
There is absolutely no way these guys are independent.
Absolutely ignore my evidence and listen only to the parkong pirates and look at only the selective photos (even though I asked for all the camera details which would clearly have shown the truth).
A disgrace
Incompetent and /or conflicted
An embarrassing organisation that purports to provide an independent arbitration service but seemingly fails to consider the evidence presented to it.
One must wonder quite what the arrangement is between the IAS and the parking companies that it mysteriously rules in favour of contrary to the evidence.
Magistrates Court is the way forward - the more that the IAS can be found fo have not acted independently or appropriately, the sooner it will be improved or abolished in favour of competent arbitrators.
Absolutely garvave organisation they…
Absolutely garbage organisation they are a farse useless people with no human correlation
Totally useless
This "service" does not work for the motorists, it works for the greedy parking operators. I appealed a very simple PCN I received, proving that the operator kept the charge away from me on purpose for a month so I could pay the higher price. The adjudicator came back with : "The Appellant should also be aware that my role as adjudicator is not to determine what may be considered procedural issues or irregularities" . I am speechless. This "service" should be banned so it does not waste the drivers' time.
Trustpilot エクスペリエンス
Trsutpilot のレビューは誰でも書くことができます。レビューを書いた人には自分の書いたレビューをいつでも編集したり削除したりする権限があり、それらのレビューはアカウントがアクティブである限り表示されます。
プラットフォーム保護のため、専門チームと高度なテクノロジーを駆使しています。偽レビューとの闘いについての詳細はこちらをご一読ください。
Trustpilot におけるレビュー プロセスの詳細についてはこちらをご覧ください。
よいレビューを書くための8つのヒントをご覧ください。
確認を行うことで、Trustpilot に投稿されるレビューが [LINK-BEGIN-PEOPLE]実在の人物[LINK-END-PEOPLE] によって書かれたものであることの保証につながります。
レビューに対してインセンティブを提供したり、選択的にレビューを依頼したりすることは、TrustScore にバイアスを生む可能性があります。これは 当社のガイドラインに反します。








